•

~~By Mail~~—You may vote by mail by requesting a proxy card from us, indicating your vote by completing, signing and dating the card where indicated and by mailing or otherwise returning the card in the envelope that will be provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), indicate your name and title or capacity.

card in the envelope that will be provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), indicate your name and title or capacity.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may also submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your bank, broker, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on ~~May 9, 2018~~ June 15, 2022 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.

Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than ~~May 9, 2018.~~

June 15, 2022.

How can I vote the shares I hold through an employee savings plan?

If you participate in the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan, you may give voting instructions to the plan trustee with respect to the shares of our common stock that are associated with your plan account by completing the voting instruction card or email notice you receive. The plan trustee will follow your voting instructions unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law. If you do not provide voting instructions, the plan trustee will act in accordance with the employee benefit plan documents. In general, the plan documents specify that the trustee will vote the shares for which it does not receive instructions in the same proportion that it votes shares for which it received timely instructions, unless it determines that to do so would be contrary to law.

You may revoke previously given instructions by following the instructions provided by the trustee.

The deadline to submit your instructions to the trustee if you hold shares through the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time on June 13, 2022.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice on or about the same time?

It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card or, if you vote by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice you receive.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

You may change your vote and revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy) using any of the methods described above (and until the applicable deadline for each method), by providing a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at ~~Gardner Denver Holdings,~~Ingersoll Rand Inc., ~~222 East Erie Street,~~525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202~~600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036 prior to your shares being voted, or by attending the Annual Meeting ~~in person or~~ via the Internet and voting. Attendance at the meeting ~~in person or~~ via the Internet will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee following the instructions it has ~~provided, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Annual Meeting in person or via the Internet and voting.~~

provided.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees (for no additional compensation) in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 1—1- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

~~Our Amended~~

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for a classified Board of Directors divided into three classes. Peter M. Stavros, William E. Kassling and Michael V. Marn constitute a class with a term that expires atCorporate Governance Committee, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2018 (the “Class I Directors”); John Humphrey, Vicente Reynal and Joshua Weisenbeck constitute a class with a term that expires at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2019 (the “Class II Directors”); and Brandon F. Brahm, William P. Donnelly and Nickolas Vande Steeg constitute a class with a term that expires at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2020 (the “Class III Directors”).

~~The~~ full Board of Directors has considered and nominated the following slate of nominees to stand for re-election for a ~~three-year~~one-year term expiring ~~in 2021: Peter M. Stavros, William E. Kassling and Michael V. Marn. Action will be taken~~ at the 2023 Annual Meeting ~~for the election~~ of ~~these three Class I nominees.~~

Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named in the form of proxy card (the “proxyholders”) attached to this proxy statement intend to vote the proxies held by them for the election of Peter M. Stavros, William E. KasslingStockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and ~~Michael V. Marn. If any of these three nominees ceases to be a candidate for election by the time~~qualified:

Name	Age	Position
Vicente Reynal	47	Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
William P. Donnelly	60	Lead Director
Kirk E. Arnold	62	Director
Elizabeth Centoni	57	Director
Gary D. Forsee	72	Director
John Humphrey	56	Director
Marc E. Jones	63	Director
Tony L. White	75	Director

The biographies and qualifications of the ~~Annual Meeting (a contingency which~~eight director nominees in this Proposal No. 1 are set forth below under the ~~Board does not expect to occur), such proxies may be voted by the proxyholders in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.~~

heading “Director Biographies and Qualifications.”

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE

ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS~~Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2018~~

Director Biographies and Qualifications

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the ~~class~~experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and ~~term of each~~Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the director ~~nominee.~~nominee should serve as a director. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of ~~the~~each director ~~nominees~~nominee is shown ~~under~~in the section titled “Ownership of ~~Securities” below.~~

Securities.”

Name			Age	~~Class I – Nominees for Term Expiring in 2021~~

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	Principal Occupation and Other Information
~~Peter M. Stavros~~	43	Peter M. Stavros has been a member of our board of directors since July 2013. Mr. Stavros joined Kohlberg Kravis and Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”) in 2005 and is a Member of KKR and head of its Industrials private equity team. He also became a member of KKR’s Americas Investment Committee in September 2013 and KKR’s Healthcare Growth Investment Committee in 2016. Prior to taking over responsibility for the Industrials sector in 2010, Mr. Stavros was a member of KKR’s Healthcare investment team. During that time, he was actively involved with the investment in HCA and, since assuming responsibility for the Industrials sector, has been actively involved with the investments in Capsugel, Capital Safety, Gardner Denver, The Crosby Group, CHI Overhead Doors and Hyperion. Prior to joining KKR, Mr. Stavros was with GTCR Golder Rauner from 2002 to 2005, where he was involved in the execution of numerous investments in the health care sector. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry, magna cum laude, from Duke University and a Master of Business Administration with high distinction, Baker Scholar, from Harvard Business School.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

		~~Class I – Nominees for Term Expiring in 2021~~

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
~~William E. Kassling~~	74	William E. Kassling has been a member of our board of directors since February 2017 and a member of the board of Gardner Denver, Inc. since August 2013. He has served as Lead Director of Wabtec Corporation, a manufacturer of braking equipment and other parts for locomotives, freight cars and passenger rail cars, since 2013. Mr. Kassling also previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Wabtec Corporation from 1990 until 2001 and 2004 to 2006, and served as Chairman from 2009 to 2013. Before leading a management group in the purchase of Wabtec Corporation from American Standard in 1990, Mr. Kassling spent six years overseeing its operations as American Standard’s Vice President, Group Executive, Railway Products Group. Prior to that, between 1978 and 1984, he served American Standard Incorporated first as Vice President, Strategic Planning and Development and later as Vice President, Group Executive and Building Specialties Group. In addition to Wabtec Corporation, Mr. Kassling is a board member of The Crosby Group, Pacific Design Technologies, the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Texas Rangers and served as a board member of Parker Hannifin Corporation from 2001 to 2015. He is also a member of the advisory board of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Mr. Kassling holds a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Management from Purdue University.

~~Michael V. Marn~~	65	Michael V. Marn has been a member of our board of directors since February 2017 and a member of the board of Gardner Denver, Inc. since August 2013. Mr. Marn has served as an Industry Advisor in KKR’s Industrials private equity team, specializing in industrial marketing since 2010. From 1977 until his retirement in 2010, he was a Partner at McKinsey & Company. As a leader in McKinsey’s worldwide marketing practice, Mike focused primarily on business-to-business clients, and split his time between assisting clients and leading research and development efforts. He also served as the Chairman of the American Red Cross Northeast Ohio Region. Mr. Marn holds a Bachelor of Arts from Hiram College and a Masters in Management Science from Case Western Reserve University.

~~YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE~~
~~ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Continuing Members of the Board of Directors~~

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the class and term of each director whose term continues beyond the Annual Meeting and who is not subject to election this year. Beneficial ownership of equity securities for these directors is also shown under “Ownership of Securities” below.

		~~Class II – Directors Whose Term Expires in 2019~~

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
Vicente Reynal			4347	Vicente Reynal has served as our ~~Chief Executive Officer since January 2016,~~chief executive officer, president and ~~has also been a~~ member of our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors since February 2017 and a member of the board of Gardner Denver, Inc.~~Directors since January 2016. Mr. Reynal was appointed chairman of our Board of Directors in November 2021. Mr. Reynal is responsible for leading the Company and driving its overall growth and profitability as a global supplier of innovative and application-critical flow control products, services and solutions. Mr. Reynal joined Gardner Denver in May 2015 as the ~~President~~president of our Industrials segment. Before joining Gardner Denver, Mr. Reynal spent 11 years at Danaher Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of professional, medical, industrial and commercial products and services, where he ~~most recently~~ served ~~as the Group President~~in a progression of Dental Technologies from December 2013 to May 2015, leading the KaVo Kerr Group. Mr. Reynal also held various other executive positions at Danaher Corporation, including as the President of the Ormco business from October 2011 to December 2013, President of the Pelton & Crane, KaVo business from 2007 to 2011 and Vice President of Global Operations for the Danaher Motion Platform from 2004 to 2007.senior leadership roles. Prior to joining Danaher, Mr. Reynal served in various operational and executive roles at Thermo Fisher Scientific and AlliedSignal Corp. (which merged with Honeywell, Inc. to become Honeywell International, Inc. in 1999). Mr. Reynal holds a ~~Bachelor~~bachelor of ~~Science~~science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and ~~Master~~master of ~~Science~~science degrees in both ~~Mechanical Engineering~~mechanical engineering and ~~Technology~~technology & ~~Policy~~policy from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

				Mr. Reynal has 24 years of experience in corporate strategy, new product development, general management processes and operations leadership with companies in the industrial, energy and medical industries.

William P. Donnelly			60	William P. Donnelly has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2017 and was appointed Lead Director in November 2021. Mr. Donnelly joined Mettler-Toledo International Inc. in 1997 and from 2014 until his retirement in December, 2018, was its executive vice president responsible for finance, investor relations, supply chain and information technology. From 1997 to 2002 and from 2004 to 2014, Mr. Donnelly served as Mettler-Toledo’s chief financial officer. From 2002 to 2004, he served as division head of Mettler-Toledo’s product inspection and certain lab businesses. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Donnelly served in various senior financial roles, including chief financial officer, of Elsag Bailey Process Automation, NV and prior to that, he was an auditor with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1983 to 1993. Mr. Donnelly received a bachelor of science in business administration from John Carroll University.

				Mr. Donnelly has many years of experience with publicly held company industrial and life science companies, including as chief financial officer and with leadership roles in strategy and operations.

Kirk E. Arnold			62	Kirk E. Arnold joined our Board of Directors upon completion of the Merger (as defined under “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters―Merger”). She is currently an executive in residence at General Catalyst Ventures, where she works with management teams to help scale and drive growth by providing mentorship, operational and strategic support. She was previously chief executive officer of Data Intensity, a cloud based data, applications and analytics managed service provider from 2013 to 2017. Prior to that, Ms. Arnold was chief operating officer of Avid, a technology provider

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name	Age	Principal Occupation and Other Information
		in the media industry, and chief executive officer and president of Keane, Inc., then a publicly traded global services provider. She has also held senior leadership roles at Computer Sciences Corp., Fidelity Investments and IBM. In addition, she was founder and chief executive officer of NerveWire, a management consulting and systems integration provider.

		Ms. Arnold currently serves on the boards of directors of Trane Technologies, Thomson Reuters, and Epiphany Technology Acquisition Corp. and formerly served on the board of directors of EnerNoc, Inc. Ms. Arnold received a bachelor’s degree from Dartmouth College.

Elizabeth Centoni	57	Elizabeth Centoni has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2018. Ms. Centoni joined Cisco Systems, Inc., an internet technology company, in 2000, and since March 2021 has been Cisco’s EVP, chief strategy officer and general manager, Applications. Prior to that, Ms. Centoni has been senior vice president, general manager of Cisco’s IoT, Cloud and Compute Business Group. In addition, Ms. Centoni served in numerous engineering senior leadership roles at Cisco, including vice president, Engineering Strategy and Portfolio Planning and vice president, general manager of the Service Provider Access Group. Ms. Centoni sits on the Supervisory Board of Mercedes-Benz AG. Ms. Centoni holds a bachelor of science in chemistry from the University of Mumbai and a master of business administration in marketing from the University of San Francisco.

		Ms. Centoni has significant experience in senior leadership roles at a publicly held technology company.

Gary D. Forsee	72	Gary D. Forsee joined our Board of Directors upon completion of the Merger. He served as president of the four-campus University of Missouri System from 2008 to 2011. He previously served as chairman of the board (from 2006 to 2007) and chief executive officer (from 2005 to 2007) of Sprint Nextel Corporation, and chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Sprint Corporation, a global telecommunications company located in Kansas City, Missouri, from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Forsee currently serves on the board of directors of Trane Technologies. Mr. Forsee previously served on the boards of Evergy, Inc., an investor-owned utility providing energy to customers in Kansas and Missouri, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, which merged with Westar Energy to form Evergy, Inc., and DST Systems, Inc., an IT service management company. Mr. Forsee received his bachelor of science in engineering and an honorary engineering and doctorate from the Missouri University of Science and Technology (f/k/a University of Missouri-Rolla).

		In addition to his broad operational and financial expertise, Mr. Forsee’s experience as chairman and chief executive officer with the third largest U.S. firm in the global telecommunications industry offers a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities within markets experiencing significant technology-driven change.

John Humphrey	5256	John Humphrey has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2018. In 2017, Mr. Humphrey retired from Roper Technologies, a company that designs and develops software and engineered products and solutions for healthcare, transportation, food, energy, water, education and other niche markets worldwide. At Roper, he served from 2011 to 2017, as ~~Executive Vice President~~executive vice president and ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~chief financial officer, and from 2006 to 2011, as ~~Vice President~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

		~~Class II – Directors Whose Term Expires in 2019~~

~~Name~~Marc E. Jones			~~Age~~63	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
~~Joshua T. Weisenbeck~~	36	~~Joshua T. Weisenbeck~~Marc E. Jones has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 2018. Mr. Jones has served as chief executive officer and chairman of Aeris Communications, Inc., a provider of machine to machine and Internet of Things communications services, since 2008. Before joining Aeris Communications, he served as president and chief executive officer of Visionael Corporation, a network service business software and service provider, from 1998 to 2005, president and chief operating officer of Madge Networks, a supplier of networking hardware, from 1994 to 1998, senior vice president, Integrated System Products of Chips and Technologies, Inc., one of the first fabless semiconductor companies, from 1987 to 1993, and senior vice president, Corporate Finance of LF Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin, a merchant and investment banking firm, from 1985 to 1987. Mr. Jones currently serves as vice chair of the board of directors ~~since July 2013.~~ of Stanford Health Care.

					Mr. ~~Weisenbeck joined KKR in 2008,~~Jones began his career at the law firm Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro. Mr. Jones currently serves on the board of trustees of Stanford University and ~~is a Member of KKR and part~~as the Chair of the ~~Industrials private equity team~~Board of Stanford Healthcare. Mr. Jones holds both a bachelor of arts in political science and a juris doctor from Stanford University. Mr. Jones has held senior leadership roles, including chief executive officer, at ~~KKR.~~several technology companies and also has experience in senior financial leadership roles and a background in law.

Tony L. White			75		Tony L. White joined our Board of Directors upon completion of the Merger. He ~~has been actively involved with~~served as chairman of the ~~investments~~board, president and chief executive officer of Applied Biosystems, Inc. (formerly Applera Corporation), a developer, manufacturer and marketer of life science systems and genomic information products, from September 1995 until his retirement in ~~Gardner Denver, Capsugel~~November 2007. Mr. White currently serves on the boards of directors of Trane and ~~Capital Safety, in addition to having portfolio company responsibility for BrightView. In addition, he serves~~CVS Health Corp, a provider of health care services and formerly served on the board of directors of ~~BrightView~~C.R. Bard, Inc., a company that designs, manufactures and ~~was formerly~~sells medical, diagnostic and patient care devices. Mr. White received a ~~director~~bachelor of ~~Capsugel and Capital Safety. Prior to joining KKR, Mr. Weisenbeck was with Onex Corporation~~arts degree from 2006 to 2008, focusing on Industrials private equity transactions, including Onex’s investment in Allison Transmission. Prior to Onex, he worked for Lazard Freres & Co. in its Power & Energy group from 2004 to 2006, where he was involved in a number of merger and acquisition transactions. He holds a Bachelor of Arts with honors, magna cum laude, from Williams College.

		~~Class III - Directors Whose Term Expires in 2020~~

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
~~Brandon F. Brahm~~	33	Brandon F. Brahm has been a member of our board of directors since July 2013. Mr. Brahm has been a member of the Industrials private equity team at KKR since 2010. He has been actively involved with the investments in Capital Safety, Gardner Denver and The Crosby Group. In addition, he serves on the board of directors of The Crosby Group and was formerly a director of Capital Safety. Prior to joining KKR, he was with Goldman Sachs in New York, where he was involved in a variety of merger, acquisition, financing and other corporate advisory transactions in the financial institutions group. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance from the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at New YorkWestern Carolina University.

~~William P. Donnelly~~	56	William P. Donnelly has been a member of our board of directors since May 2017. Mr. Donnelly joined Mettler-Toledo International Inc. in 1997 and since 2014 has been Executive Vice President responsible for finance, investor relations, supply chain and information technology. From 1997 to 2002 and from 2004 to 2014, Mr. Donnelly served as Mettler-Toledo’s Chief Financial Officer. From 2002 to 2004, he served as division head of Mettler-Toledo’s product inspection and certain lab businesses. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Donnelly served in various senior financial roles, including Chief Financial Officer, of Elsag Bailey Process Automation, NV and prior to that, he was an auditor with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1983 to 1993. Mr. Donnelly serves on the Executive Committee of John Carroll University’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Donnelly received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from John Carroll University.
			Mr. White’s extensive management experience, including 13 years as chairman and chief executive officer of an advanced-technology life sciences firm, provides substantial expertise and guidance across all aspects of the Company’s operational and financial affairs.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL NO. 2-RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.

Although ratification is not required by our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP unless you specify otherwise.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

In connection with the audit of the 2021 financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte & Touche LLP which set forth the terms by which Deloitte & Touche LLP would perform audit services for the Company.

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for those periods, all of which were approved by the Audit Committee.

	For the Years Ended December 31, (in thousands)
	2021	2020
Fees:
Audit fees⁽¹⁾	$9.088	$8,510
Audit Related fees⁽²⁾	$3,458	5,462
Tax fees⁽³⁾	$9,357	6,764
All other fees⁽⁴⁾	—	3,100
Total	$21,903	$23,836

(1)	Audit fees include fees for the annual integrated audit, quarterly reviews, non-U.S. statutory audits and Specialty Vehicle Technologies segment carve-out audits.

(2)	~~Class III - Directors Whose Term Expires~~Audit related fees include fees primarily for business due diligence services related to various acquisitions.

(3)	Tax fees primarily consist of fees for tax advisory services related to acquisitions and restructurings, but also include fees for income tax, transfer pricing and other required tax filings in non-US jurisdictions.

(4)	All other fees in 2020

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
~~Nickolas Vande Steeg~~	75	~~Nickolas Vande Steeg has been a member of our board of directors since February 2017 and a member of~~ include advisory services rendered in connection with the ~~board~~merger of Gardner Denver Holdings, Inc with Ingersoll-Rand plc’s Industrials business segment in an all-stock, Reverse Morris Trust transaction (the “Merger”). Immediately following the Merger, we changed our named from Gardner Denver Holdings, Inc. since August 2013. He served for 34 years at Parker Hannifin Corporation, a global supplier of innovative engineered products, in positions of increasing responsibility culminating as President, Chief Operating Officerto Ingersoll Rand Inc. and ~~Board Member~~changed our ticker symbol from ~~2004~~“GDI” to ~~2007. Mr. Vande Steeg currently serves on~~“IR.” References herein to “Gardner Denver” are to the board of Trimble, Inc. since 2006 and is a trustee of an APU/ UC University, board member of several non-profits, and a minority partner in a Major League Baseball team. He is also a director and partial owner of Pacific Design Technologies, an Aerospace thermal management supplier, since 2015. He obtained a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology fromCompany prior to the ~~University of California and a Master of Business Administration with highest honors from Pepperdine University. Mr. Vande Steeg was awarded the Shingo Lean Leadership Management Award in 2006.~~ Merger.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Audit Committee pre-approved all the services included in this table. The Audit Committee of the Board considered whether providing the non-audit services included in this table was compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence and concluded that it was.

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and our Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by any independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE

RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2022.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Our Board manages or directs the business and affairs of the Company, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its business through meetings of the Board and ~~two~~four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the ~~Compensation~~Sustainability Committee. Because affiliates of KKR hold more than 50% of our common stock we are considered a “controlled company” as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). As such, we have elected to be exempt from the requirements to have a nominating/corporate governance committee, a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors and a majority of independent directors on our Board.

Our Board evaluates the Company’s corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis with a view towards maintaining the best corporate governance practices in the context of the Company’s current business environment and aligning our governance practices closely with the interests of our stockholders.

Recent Governance Enhancements

In order to better align our corporate governance with best practices and expand the rights of our stockholders, in 2021 we implemented certain governance enhancements.

Following stockholder approval, we declassified our Board, implemented a majority voting standard in the election of directors, and replaced the supermajority voting requirements in our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws with a majority voting standard in order to give our stockholders a more meaningful vote in various corporate matters.

Additionally, the Board recently approved revisions to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines creating a role of Lead Director of the Board. The Lead Director is elected by a plurality vote of the independent directors, or via unanimous vote of the independent directors if via written consent action, and serves until the Board meeting immediately following the third anniversary of appointment, provided, however, the Board may extend such term by any length up to the fifth anniversary of the Board meeting immediately following the appointment. The creation of the Lead Director role reflects the Company’s continued commitment to enhanced corporate governance best practices. The duties and responsibilities of the Lead Director are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines which is available on our website at www.irco.com under “Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Corporate Governance Guidelines.”

Recognizing the importance of sustainability to our Company and to our world, we established a new Sustainability Committee of our Board in October, 2021, focused on overseeing and advising the Board on the Company’s sustainability strategies and initiatives, including reviewing the overall sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and diversity, equity and inclusion strategies, initiatives and goals. We felt that a separate committee focused on these critical topics provides greater oversight and attention than simply having these matters addressed by an existing Board committee.

Our Board and management value the perspective of our stockholders and encourage stockholders to communicate with the Board as described under “―Communications with the Board” below.

Communications with the Board

As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the chairperson of the Audit, Compensation, Sustainability or ~~Compensation~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by addressing such communications or concerns to the Secretary of the Company, ~~222 East Erie Street,~~525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.~~

600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036.

Director Independence and Independence Determinations

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and ~~NYSE~~New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines define independence in accordance with the independence definition in the current NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our Board of Directors to review the independence of all directors at least annually.

In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the objective tests set forth in the NYSE independence definition, our Board of Directors will determine, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, whether such relationship is material.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of ~~Messrs.~~Kirk E. Arnold, Elizabeth Centoni, William P. Donnelly, Gary D. Forsee, John Humphrey, ~~Kassling, Vande Steeg~~Marc E. Jones and ~~Donnelly~~Tony L. White is independent under the guidelines for director independence set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and under all applicable NYSE guidelines, including with respect to committee membership.

Our Board also has determined that each of Messrs. Donnelly, ~~Kassling~~Forsee and Humphrey is “independent” for purposes of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that ~~Mr. Vande Steeg~~each of Messrs. Donnelly and Jones and Ms. Arnold is “independent” for purposes of Section 10C(a)(3) of the Exchange Act.

In ~~addition,~~sum, seven out of the eight current members of our Board of Directors ~~had~~have been determined ~~that Pastor Velasco, who resigned from the~~to be independent and includes each director other than Mr. Reynal, our Chief Executive Officer.

Annual Independent Board Assessment

Each year, our Board of Directors ~~in October 2017, was~~and each of its committees conducts an assessment of its performance. This assessment is overseen and facilitated by an independent ~~under~~firm. This independent firm conducts the ~~guidelines for director independence~~assessment through a survey process and communicates the results with our Board chair and the chair of each of the committees. The results are then discussed with the full Board of Directors and, if needed, actions are formulated and executed that address any areas of opportunity identified through the assessment.

Incumbent Director Qualifications

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set ~~forth in~~to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to our Company during their respective term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any relationships and transactions that might impair such directors’ independence. In addition, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, ~~and under all applicable NYSE guidelines, including with respect~~no person shall be nominated by the Board to ~~committee membership,~~serve as ~~well as~~a director after he or she has passed his or her 75th birthday, unless the Board has voted to waive the mandatory retirement age for ~~purposes~~such director at the time of ~~Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act.~~

nomination.

Board Structure

Our Board of Directors is led by Mr. ~~Stavros,~~Reynal, our ~~Chairman. The~~Chairman, and Mr. Donnelly our Lead Director. Mr. Reynal serves in a combined role of Chief Executive Officer ~~position~~and Chairman, which provides the significant advantages of our Chairman having extensive experience with the business and ongoing executive responsibility for the Company. We believe these advantages bolster the Company’s ability to execute on its strategic imperatives and deliver stockholder value. Consistent with best governance practices, we created the new Lead Director role to work closely with our Chairman. This role is ~~currently separate from~~held by Mr. Donnelly and is designed to help coordinate the ~~Chairman position.~~ efforts of the independent and non-management directors to ensure objective judgment with respect to sensitive issues involving the management of the Company and, in particular, the performance of senior management.

We believe that the ~~separation~~combined role of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, together with our Lead Director role and the other elements of our corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent and effective oversight of our business and affairs that enables appropriate corporate governance. The Board believes that a combined Chairman and Chief Executive role allows the Company to effectively convey its business strategy and core values to shareholders, customers, colleagues, regulators and the public in a single, consistent voice. The Board also recognizes the necessity of having a strong Lead Director with a clearly defined role and set of responsibilities where the Chairman is not independent. Their leadership is supplemented by engaged and expert committee chairs along with independent-minded, skilled and committed directors.

Our Board does not currently have a policy as to whether the role of Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer should be separate and believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by maintaining the flexibility to determine whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions isshould be separated or combined at a given point in time in order to provide appropriate ~~corporate governance~~leadership for us at ~~this time. Accordingly, Mr. Stavros serves~~that time given the then-current circumstances. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, in order to maintain the independent integrity of our Board, if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, the Board may appoint an independent director as ~~Chairman, while Mr. Reynal serves as our Chief Executive Officer.~~

Lead Director. See “Recent Governance Enhancements” above for further discussion of the Lead Director role.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We believe that strong independent leadership is essential for our Board to effectively perform its primary oversight functions. We also believe it is critically important for our Board to retain flexibility to determine its leadership structure based on the particular composition of the Board, the individuals serving in leadership positions, the needs and opportunities of the Company as they change over time.

Board Committees and Meetings

The following table summarizes the current membership of each of the Board’s Committees.

Kirk E. Arnold

X, Chair

Elizabeth Centoni

William P. Donnelly

X, Chair

Gary D. Forsee

John Humphrey

X, Chair

Marc E. Jones

X, Chair

Tony L. White

Number of meetings held in 2021

~~Audit Committee~~

~~Compensation~~
~~Committee~~

~~William P. Donnelly~~

~~X, Chair~~

~~John Humphrey~~

~~William E. Kassling~~

~~Peter M. Stavros~~

~~X, Chair~~

~~Nickolas Vande Steeg~~

~~Joshua T. Weisenbeck~~

All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and the annual meeting of stockholders. During ~~2017,~~2021, the Board held 5eight meetings and acted ~~4 times by unanimous written consent. During 2017, (i) the Audit Committee held 6 meetings and did not act by unanimous written consent; and (ii) the Compensation Committee held 6 meetings and acted 2~~seven times by unanimous written consent. No member of the Board attended fewer than 75% (which is the minimum required attendance) of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she was a director) and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served (held during the period that such director served).

All eight current directors serving at the time of last year’s annual meeting attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Audit Committee

~~During the course of 2017, our~~

Our Audit Committee ~~consisted~~currently consists of Messrs. Donnelly, ~~Kassling, Stavros~~Forsee and ~~Velasco. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Donnelly,~~ Humphrey, ~~and Kassling,~~ with Mr. Donnelly serving as Chair. All ~~current~~ members of the Audit Committee have been determined to be “independent,” consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and audit committees in particular. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, our Board has determined that Messrs. Donnelly, Humphrey and ~~Humphrey~~Forsee qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission ~~(the “SEC”~~(“SEC”) regulations. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Donnelly’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Donnelly’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Mettler-Toledo International Inc. and as an auditor with PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Humphrey’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Humphrey’s experience as the Chief Financial Officer of Roper Technologies.

The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Forsee’s qualification based on, among other things, Mr. Forsee’s experience as Chief Executive Officer of Sprint Nextel Corporation.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at ~~www.gardnerdenver.com~~www.irco.com under Investors: ~~Corporate~~ Governance: Governance ~~Documents:~~Documents & Charters: Audit Committee Charter, and include the following:

overseeing the adequacy and integrity of our financial statements and our financial reporting disclosure practices;

overseeing the soundness of our system of internal controls to assure compliance with financial and accounting requirements, our system of disclosure controls and procedures and compliance with ethical standards adopted by the Company;

retaining and reviewing the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent auditor;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

overseeing our general risk management strategy including guidelines and policies relating to risk assessment and risk management, and management’s plan ~~for~~and execution of appropriate risk mitigation strategies which include risk monitoring and ~~control;~~

controls;

overseeing our internal audit function; ~~and~~

reviewing and approving or ratifying all transactions between us and any “Related Persons” (as defined in the federal securities laws and regulations) that are required to be disclosed to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange ~~Act of 1934;~~Act; and

reviewing and discussing with management compliance with our Code of Conduct.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee include reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or other public dissemination in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

The Audit Committee also prepares the report of the committee required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement.

The charter of the Audit Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees. In addition, the Audit Committee has the authority under its charter to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it deems necessary or advisable.

On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and procedures. See “Oversight of Risk Management” below.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. ~~Stavros, Vande Steeg~~Donnelly and ~~Weisenbeck,~~Jones and Ms. Arnold, with ~~Mr. Stavros~~Ms. Arnold serving as chair. ~~Mr. Vande Steeg has~~All members of our Compensation Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and compensation committees in particular.

The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at ~~www.gardnerdenver.com~~www.irco.com under Investors: ~~Corporate~~ Governance: Governance ~~Documents:~~Documents & Charters: Compensation Committee Charter, and include the following:

establishing and reviewing the overall compensation philosophy of the Company;

reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers’ compensation, including annual performance objectives, if any;

evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of these corporate goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determining and approving the annual salary, bonus, equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the Chief Executive Officer;

reviewing and approving or making recommendations to the Board on the annual salary, bonus, equity and equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the other executive officers;

reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans that are subject to the approval of the Board, and overseeing the activities of the individuals responsible for administering those plans;

reviewing and approving equity compensation plans of the Company that are not otherwise subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders;

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, or approving, all equity-based awards, including pursuant to the Company’s equity-based plans;

monitoring compliance by executives with the rules and guidelines of the Company’s equity-based plans; and

reviewing and monitoring all employee retirement, profit sharing and benefit plans of the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee include overseeing the preparation of and recommending the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to the Board for inclusion in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

The charter of the Compensation Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees and to delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make awards to any non-Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s incentive-compensation or other equity-based plan, subject to compliance with the plan and the laws of the state of the Company’s jurisdiction.

In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or advisors, as it deems necessary or advisable.

For a description of our processes and procedures for the determination of executive and director compensation, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Director Compensation in Fiscal ~~2017―~~2021―Description of Director Compensation” sections of this ~~proxy statement.~~

Proxy Statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Humphrey and White and Ms. Centoni, with Mr. Humphrey serving as chair. All members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards.

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and include the following:

identifying and recommending nominees for election to the Board of Directors;

reviewing the composition and size of the Board of Directors;

overseeing an annual evaluation of the Board of Directors and each committee;

regularly reviewing our corporate governance documents, including our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines;

recommending members of the Board of Directors to serve on committees of the Board; and

overseeing and approving the management continuity planning process.

The charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside counsel or other experts as it deems necessary or advisable.

Sustainability Committee

Our Sustainability Committee currently consists of Messrs. Jones and Foresee and Ms. Arnold, with Mr. Jones serving as chair. All members of our Sustainability Committee have been determined to be “independent” as defined by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE listing standards.

The duties and responsibilities of the Sustainability Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.irco.com under Investors: Governance: Governance Documents & Charters: Sustainability Committee Charter, and include the following:

assessing current aspects of the Company’s environmental, health and safety policies and performance and making recommendations to the Board of Directors and the management of the Company;

overseeing and advising the Board of Directors on the Company’s sustainability strategies and initiatives, including reviewing the overall sustainability strategy and progress towards achievement of other environmental targets and goals;

reviewing and approving the Company’s annual sustainability report;

overseeing and advising the Board of Directors on matters impacting corporate social responsibility;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

overseeing and advising the Board of Directors on the Company’s public policy management, philanthropic contributions and corporate reputation management;

overseeing the Company’s policies on political contributions and annually reviewing the Company’s political contributions and lobbying expenses; and

overseeing and advising the Board of Directors and management with respect to the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion strategies, initiatives and goals.

Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has extensive involvement in the oversight of risk management related to us and our business and accomplishes this through oversight ~~through the~~and regular reporting by the Audit ~~Committee.~~Committee, the chairman and members of which have experience in overseeing risk management strategy, including risk management related to information and cyber security. The Audit Committee

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

represents the Board in this oversight role by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, ~~the surveillance of~~surveilling our administrative and financial controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory ~~requirements.~~ requirements and reviewing and assessing overall company risk through a formalized enterprise risk management (ERM) program led by the management team.

Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal, and internal audit functions, as part of our ERM program, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of ~~our business, including areas~~risk. Such review and discussion includes a comprehensive review and assessment of ~~risk (including~~cybersecurity risks, other cyber ~~risk)~~risks and potential key emerging risks. The Audit Committee also reviews and assesses management’s remediation plans with respect to such risks and other relevant mitigating factors and summarizes these discussions for the Board. As part of our ERM program, management reports to the Audit Committee quarterly with respect to all significant areas of risk (including cyber risks and emerging risks), which allows the Audit Committee to closely monitor the Company’s developing risk landscape. Our head of internal audit, who is also our Chief Risk Officer, reports directly to the Audit Committee.

In addition to the oversight with respect to overall Company risk management provided by the Audit Committee, the other committees participate in the risk management process. The Compensation Committee considers, and discusses with management, management’s assessment of certain risks, including whether any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and evaluates programs and risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning and corporate governance. The Sustainability Committee assesses current aspects of the Company’s environmental, health and safety policies and performance and make recommendations to the Board of Directors and the management of the Company with regard to promoting and maintaining superior standards of performance, including processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and programs to manage risks relating to environmental and safety matters.

Executive Sessions

Executive sessions, which are meetings of ~~the non-management~~independent members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. ~~In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and non-independent directors.~~ At each of these meetings, Mr. Donnelly, as our independent Lead Director, presides.

Diversity and Sustainability

Sustainability constitutes a pillar of our corporate strategy and we are committed to embedding environmental, social and governance initiatives into our culture.

Commitment to Diversity - Board of Directors

A key principle of the ~~non-management~~Company’s Board member selection process is to strive to have a diverse Board of Directors. A critical factor that the Board and ~~independent directors~~the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee carefully consider when assessing potential director candidates is the importance to the Company of ethnic and gender diversity in ~~attendance,~~board composition. As set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board are required to consider, and to request that any search firm hired by it consider, highly qualified women and diverse candidates as ~~applicable,~~part of any director search process. The

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board’s commitment to this focus on Board diversity has resulted in a Board where five of eight current members (62%) are diverse, including two who are female and four who are ethnically diverse. In addition, Board members actively participate as mentors and panel speakers in quarterly events hosted by the Company’s inclusion groups.

Commitment to Diversity - Global Workforce

In 2021, we continued to strengthen our commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) within our workforce. These commitments include:

Be a DE&I leader within our industry that mirrors the communities and customers we serve.

Leverage diversity, equity and inclusion to exceed our business goals, attract and retain the best talent and enhance our employees’ experience, and address today’s global challenges.

Cultivate diversity, promote equity and pursue a more inclusive culture that strengthens the sense of belonging for all.

We expect our employees and all individuals we associate with to uphold these aspirations with humility, integrity and respect.

In terms of diverse representation, we have two focus areas: 1) underrepresented populations in the United States and 2) women globally. Our employee base as of December 31, 2021 consisted of 16% underrepresented populations in the U.S. and our goal is to increase the percentage of underrepresented populations in our U.S. employee base to 30% by 2025. Globally, women represented as of December 31, 2021, 22.6% of our population, which exceeded our first year target of 22.25%, and keeps us on track to reach our goal to increase the percentage of women in our global employee population to 25% by 2025.

We are making strides at increasing the number of gender diverse employees in more senior roles with our promotion rate increasing to 40.9%, surpassing our goal of 40%. In addition, 43% of our extended leadership team are gender or ethnically diverse. These advances are reflected in our year-over-year improvement in the employee engagement scores in four categories that we believe are closely connected to DE&I: belonging, growth, inclusion and equal opportunity.

We have expanded our employee inclusion groups to build stronger global connections, advocate for positive change and foster an inclusive culture in the organization. We currently have nine Employee Inclusion Groups (a Black Employee Network Inclusion Group, a Veterans Inclusion Group, a Women Inclusion Group, a Hispanic/LatinX Organization of Leadership and Advancement, Four regional inclusion groups (Europe and Asia Pacific) and One DE&I council in Latin America). An executive leader sponsors each group and provides guidance to establish goals in support of our company strategies, culture and values to their global members.

In addition, we continue to set the groundwork for inclusion by training our employees on unconscious bias and how to recognize bias in the workplace and in ourselves and have deployed our unconscious bias training to more than 82% of our salaried employees and conducted personalized sessions to over 150 leaders on “DE&I Matters.” In 2021, we continued our powerful initiative called “Lean into Change” where employees from across the company participate in culturally sensitive conversations with trust and transparency.

Central to our inclusion strategy is to make all employees true owners of the Company. To that end, we also announced a process by which all new or acquired employees will ~~determine~~receive stock in the Company after one year of employment¹. We feel that the combination of a solid strategy, strong values and clear expectations, coupled with true employee ownership, provides us strong engagement and a competitive edge.

Commitment to Sustainability

In 2021, we established a Sustainability Committee of our Board to provide oversight and guidance to the execution of our Operate Sustainably strategic imperative. As part of implementing our sustainability strategy, we have embedded sustainability into our culture and company; driving accountability and execution of our sustainability goals and initiatives through our Ingersoll Rand Execution (IRX) process; and providing transparency to the public on our progress in achieving these goals.

1	Employees must be full time and have one year of service to be eligible. Not available to employees where prohibited by local law or regulation or where such grant is required to be bargained for with an employee union unless such grant is agreed to as part of such bargaining.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In 2020, we conducted a materiality assessment that included the input of employees, customers, stockholders, suppliers and other stakeholders. This assessment identified energy use, product stewardship and innovation, and our employees as our most material topics. Since then, we have continued to structure our environmental, social and governance initiatives around these material topics and deployed IRX processes to help us achieve them.

In 2021, we announced our aggressive corporate sustainability goals designed to reduce the impact of our operations and products on the environment, and support customers and partners in doing the same. Achievement of these goals will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save energy, create safer water for our communities and result in reduced waste to landfill, all of which ~~member will preside~~directly advance progress against our material topics. Further details with respect to our sustainability goals can be found on our website, www.irco.com, under “Investors: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG).”

In addition, we continue to focus on transparency with respect to our sustainability progress through our annual sustainability reports, including our 2020 sustainability report released in July 2021, and an investor call on August 6, 2021, where we provided a mid-year update on our sustainability initiatives.

In 2021, we also implemented an enhanced environmental policy that confirms our commitment to a clean environment and compliance with environmental laws and an active environmental management program aimed at ~~such session.~~

complying with existing environmental regulations and reducing the generation of pollutants in the manufacturing processes.

All of these actions resulted in substantial progress on our sustainability initiatives in 2021. At the beginning of the year, we set a three-year goal to be recognized in the top quartile of industrial companies for sustainability. We achieved this goal in little more than one year with S&P Global and Sustainalytics both recognizing us as being in the top 15% of companies within our sector.

As mentioned above, our Board and management value the perspective of our stockholders and encourage stockholders to communicate with the Board, including with respect to our diversity and sustainability initiatives, as described under “―Communications with the Board” above.

Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Board’s views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time by ~~the Board~~our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by the Board.

For example, as mentioned above, the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, recently approved revisions to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines creating a role of Lead Director of the Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of our Audit ~~and~~Committee, Compensation Committee, ~~charters~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Sustainability Committee and other corporate governance information are available on the Corporate Governance page of the Investors section on our website at ~~www.gardnerdenver.com~~www.irco.com. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Secretary of the Company, ~~222 East Erie Street,~~525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.~~

600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036.

Code of Conduct

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of the Company’s employees, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, confidentiality, compliance with laws (including insider trading laws), use of our assets and business conduct and fair dealing. This Code of Conduct also satisfies the requirements for a code of ethics, as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or waivers of the Code of Conduct granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, or any other ~~executve~~executive officer or director, by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Code of Conduct may be found on our website at ~~www.gardnerdenver.com~~www.irco.com under Investors: ~~Corporate~~ Governance: Governance ~~Documents:~~Documents & Charters: Code of Conduct.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits the Company’s directors, officers and employees from engaging in any transactions (including variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities.

Director Nomination Process

~~Because the Board of Directors believes that all of the directors of the Company should be involved in the process of nominating persons for election as directors~~

The Nominating and the Company is not required to have a nominating committee under the listing standards of the NYSE as described above, the Board of Directors as a whole performs the functions of nominating committee and is responsible for reviewing the requisite skills and characteristics of the nominees for the Board of Directors.

~~The Board~~Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board. In considering candidates for the Board, the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the size, composition and combined expertise of the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates, although the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does at a minimum assess each candidate’s strength of character, mature judgment, industry knowledge or experience and his or her independence of thought and ability to work collegially with the other members of the

Board.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Board.~~ In addition, ~~although~~it is the Board’s policy to endeavor to have a diverse Board of Directors representing a range of experiences in areas that are relevant to the Company’s strategy and business and, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as part of any director search process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board ~~considers~~of Directors will, and will request that any search firm hired by it also, consider highly qualified women and diverse individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board implement this policy by requiring that all director searches include qualified women and diverse candidates and requiring any search firms engaged by them to include and present such candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board assess the effectiveness of this policy by evaluating the diversity of ~~viewpoints, background~~the candidates presented to them compared to the total number of candidates presented as well as whether an open Board position is in fact filled with a diverse candidate.

The Nominating and ~~experiences,~~Corporate Governance Committee and the Board ~~does not have a formal diversity policy.~~ believe that this policy is effective given that both of the last two Board positions filled by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board were diverse candidates and that over 60% of the Board is currently comprised of diverse directors.

In identifying prospective director candidates, the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals from its members, management, stockholders and other sources. The ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may, but need not, retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral. When considering director candidates, the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Board’s effectiveness.

The stockholders’ agreement described below under “Transactions with Related Persons” provides that KKR has the right to nominate to our Board a number of designees approximately equal to the percentage of voting power of all shares of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors collectively beneficially owned by KKR. Currently, three directors (Messrs. Stavros, Weisenbeck and Brahm) nominated by KKR serve on our Board of Directors.

In connection with its annual nomination of a slate of nominees, the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also assess the contributions of those directors recommended for re-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board.

When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the board member’s biographical information set forth ~~above.~~under “Director Biographies and Qualifications.” Each of the Company’s directors possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity and exercises careful, mature judgment. Each is committed to employing his or her skills and abilities to aid the long-term interests of the stakeholders of the Company. In addition, our directors are knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business, governmental, or civic endeavors, which further qualifies them for service as members of the Board. A significant number of our directors possess experience in owning and managing public and privately held

TABLE OF CONTENTS

enterprises and are familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities that are unique to publicly traded companies like ours.

~~In particular,~~ See the ~~members of~~directors’ biographical information set forth above for the important characteristics considered by our Board ~~of Directors considered the following important characteristics:~~

~~Vicente Reynal,~~in determining that our Chief Executive Officer, has 22 years of experience in corporate strategy, new product development, general management processes and operations leadership with companies in the industrial, energy and medical industries.

Peter M. Stavros, Joshua T. Weisenbeck and Brandon F. Brahm are representatives appointed by affiliates of KKR, our principal stockholder, and have significant financial, investment and operational experience from their involvement in KKR’s investments in numerous portfolio companies and have played active roles in overseeing those businesses.

~~William E. Kassling has many years of experience at manufacturing companies, including experience~~directors should serve as ~~chief executive officer and chairman~~directors of the ~~board of a publicly held company.~~Company.

~~Michael V. Marn has many years of experience as senior partner at a consulting company and has been involved in KKR’s investments in industrial companies.~~

~~Nickolas Vande Steeg has many years of experience as president, chief operating officer and board member of a publicly held engineered products company.~~

~~William P. Donnelly has many years of experience as the chief financial officer of a publicly held company.~~

~~John Humphrey has many years of experience at manufacturing companies, including experience as the chief financial officer and board member of a publicly held company.~~

This annual director nomination process resulted in the Board’s nomination of the ~~three~~eight incumbent directors named in Proposal 1 in this Proxy Statement and proposed for election by you at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

The ~~Board regularly considers~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any recommendation submitted to the Secretary of the Company should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Secretary of the Company, ~~Gardner Denver Holdings,~~Ingersoll Rand Inc., ~~222 East Erie Street,~~525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.~~600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036. All recommendations for nomination received by the Secretary of the Company that satisfy our ~~by-law~~Bylaw requirements relating to such director nominations will be presented to the ~~Board~~Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration. Stockholders must also satisfy the notification, timeliness, consent and information requirements set forth in our ~~by-laws.~~Bylaws. These requirements are also described under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the ~~2019~~2023 Annual Meeting.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Officers of the Company

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, other than Vicente Reynal, whose biographical information is presented under ~~“Continuing Members of the Board of Directors.~~“Director Biographies and Qualifications.”

Name	Age	Principal Occupation and Other Information
~~Philip T. Herndon~~Gary Gillespie	5266	~~Philip T.~~Since the completion of the Merger, Gary Gillespie has served as the senior vice president and general manager of the Industrial Technologies and Services, Americas business unit of the combined company.

		Prior to this role, Mr. Gillespie served as vice president, general manager for Industrial Americas of Gardner Denver, overseeing all Compressor, Blower, Vacuum and Industrial Pump products. He joined Gardner Denver in 1981. During his tenure, he has held various positions of increasing responsibility, including sourcing/procurement, customer service, sales management and product management. Prior to joining Gardner Denver, he was employed by Quincy Compressor and Fiat-Allis Machinery.

		Mr. Gillespie holds a bachelor of science degree from Illinois State University.

Elizabeth M. Hepding	44	Since July 2021, Elizabeth Hepding has served as the senior vice president of strategy and corporate development. Prior to that, Ms. Hepding has had more than 20 years of experience in mergers and acquisitions and strategy, most recently as part of the team at PurposeBuilt Brands, Inc. (“~~Todd”~~PurposeBuilt Brands”) ~~Herndon~~a portfolio of category-leading, efficacy-driven specialty cleaning and disinfection brands, where she served as vice president of corporate development and guided the company’s expansion through acquisitions. Prior to joining PurposeBuilt Brands in 2019, Ms. Hepding was senior vice president, strategy and corporate development at Essendant Inc., a leading national distributor of work place items for six years, where she was responsible for all acquisitions, divestitures and partnerships, as well as enterprise strategy including transformational initiatives. Ms. Hepding began her career in investment banking, spending more than a decade in the industry, primarily at UBS Investment Bank where she held roles of increasing responsibility.

		Ms. Hepding received a master of business administration from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and bachelor’s degree from Washington & Lee University where she graduated cum laude.

Nicholas Kendall-Jones	51	Since the completion of the Merger, Nick Kendall-Jones has served as the senior vice president and general manager of the Precision and Science Technologies business unit of the combined company. He joined Ingersoll-Rand plc in May 2019 following the acquisition of PFS from Accudyne Industries. Prior to joining Ingersoll Rand, Mr. Kendall-Jones’ most recent leadership role was serving as president of PFS Accudyne Industries from October 2016.

		Mr. Kendall-Jones started his career in finance with ITT Corporation, a worldwide manufacturing company, serving in various European roles and general management roles, including leading Xylem’s Global Industrial Water business and as a fluid platform president of a Crane Company division.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name	Age	Principal Occupation and Other Information
		Mr. Kendall-Jones has a degree in business and finance from Basingstoke College in the UK, is a certified Lean Six Sigma Champion and a graduate of the Strategy Leadership Development Program of the UK’s Ashridge School of Business.

Kathleen M. Keene	48	Kate Keene has served as our ~~Chief Financial Officer~~senior vice president of human resources, talent and diversity, equity and inclusion since ~~October 2016. Mr. Herndon~~June, 2021. Ms. Keene joined Ingersoll Rand in 2016 as director of Human Resources (“HR”) for corporate functions and then led a global HR team supporting the company’s Fluid Management, Material Handling and Power Tools business units. Prior to her current role, Ms. Keene most recently served as the HR business partner for Ingersoll Rand’s global Precision and Science Technologies segment while also leading the North America region HR team.

		Prior to joining Ingersoll Rand, Ms. Keene started her career with General Electric Company, a multinational conglomerate, and SABIC, a multinational chemical manufacturing company. She holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration and management from Pennsylvania State University.

Vikram Kini	41	Vikram Kini has served as our senior vice president and chief financial officer since June 15, 2020. He joined Gardner Denver as its director of Financial Planning and Analysis in ~~January 2016~~2011, has served as ~~Chief~~Gardner Denver’s vice president of Investor Relations since 2012, and has held other various finance leadership roles since 2012, including vice president of Financial ~~Officer~~Planning and Analysis and vice president of ~~our~~the Finance, Industrials segment. ~~Mr. Herndon is responsible for leading the Company’s financial and accounting operations, information technology on a global basis and global pricing excellence.~~

		Prior to joining Gardner Denver, Mr. ~~Herndon~~Kini served as the Chief Financial Officer of Capital Safety, Inc., the nation’s top producer of fall safety equipment, from November 2012 to August 2015. Prior to joining Capital Safety, Mr. Herndon was Vice President of Finance for Sealed Air Corporation, a packaging manufacturer, from 2011 to 2012. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Herndon was Vice President of Business Development and Corporate Controller at Diversey, Inc. Prior to 2007, Mr. Herndon heldin various financial roles with General Electric Company, a multinational conglomerate, and ~~general management roles within Diversey, Inc.~~SABIC, a multinational chemical manufacturing company. Mr. ~~Herndon graduated from Indiana University with a Bachelor of Business Administration and~~Kini holds a ~~Master of Business~~bachelor’s degree in business administration from ~~Marquette~~Boston University.

Andrew Schiesl	4650	Since the completion of the Merger, Andrew Schiesl has served as ~~our Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer~~the senior vice president, general counsel, chief compliance officer and ~~Secretary~~secretary of the combined company. He leads legal, compliance, communications, governance, risk management and corporate social responsibility, which includes the combined company’s Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) and sustainability efforts. Prior to this role, Mr. Schiesl served as vice president, general counsel, chief compliance officer and secretary at Gardner Denver since ~~joining~~2013 and was also responsible for leading human resources at Gardner Denver in ~~December 2013. Mr. Schiesl is responsible for leading the Company’s~~addition to Gardner Denver’s legal, compliance, governance and risk management ~~functions and has global oversight for human resource and compensation matters.~~functions.

		Previously, Mr. Schiesl served as ~~Vice President~~vice president and ~~General Counsel~~general counsel of Quad/Graphics, Inc., a commercial printing business, from 2003 until he joined Gardner Denver. ~~Prior to Quad/Graphics, he~~He was ~~Senior Counsel~~also senior counsel at Harley-Davidson, Inc., after beginning his career practicing law with Foley & Lardner LLP in Milwaukee.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Name~~	~~Age~~	~~Principal Occupation and Other Information~~
		Previously, Mr. Snyder held various executive roles of increasing responsibility at United Technologies Corporation from 2007 to 2012 and Hewlett-Packard Company from 2002 to 2006. Mr. Snyder began his career at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Snyder holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Southern California and a Master of Business Administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Enrique Miñarro Viseras			4044	Since the completion of the Merger, Enrique Miñarro Viseras has served as the senior vice president and general manager of the Industrial Technologies and Services, Europe, Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA) business unit of the combined company and since January 2021, Mr. Miñarro Viseras’ responsibilities have also included global oversight of our ~~Vice President and General Manager, Industrials segment EMEA Region since joining Gardner Denver in May 2016.~~high pressure hydrogen business. Prior to the Merger, Mr. Miñarro Viseras isserved as vice president and general manager, Industrials segment EMEIA Region at Gardner Denver since May 2016, where he has been responsible for leading all Industrials segment operations, including sales, service, engineering, product management and manufacturing within Europe, Middle East, Africa and India.

				Prior to Gardner Denver, Mr. Miñarro Viseras had an extensive ~~fifteen year~~15-year career at Emerson Network Power and Emerson Industrial Automation, most recently serving as the ~~Managing Director,~~managing director, Emerson Network Power from May 2015 to April 2016.

				Prior to ~~Managing Director,~~his role as managing director, Mr. Miñarro Viseras held the position of ~~President,~~president, Control Techniques for Emerson Industrial Automation from July 2012 to April 2015. ~~Mr. Miñarro Viseras~~He holds a doctorate in engineering, a master of business administration and a master of engineering and management from Cranfield University, United Kingdom as well as a degree in ~~Industrial Engineering~~industrial engineering from Universidad Politécnica of Valencia, ~~Spain, a Master of Business Administration and a Master of Engineering and Management from Cranfield University, United Kingdom and a Doctorate in Engineering.~~Spain.

~~Mark R. Sweeney~~Michael A. Weatherred			5660	~~Mark R. Sweeney~~Since the completion of the Merger, Michael A. Weatherred has served as ~~our Chief Accounting Officer since January 2017.~~the senior vice president of the combined company, leading Ingersoll Rand Execution Excellence (IRX), Strategy and Business Development.

				Prior to the Merger, Mr. ~~Sweeney~~Weatherred served as vice president of Execution Excellence at Gardner Denver. He joined Gardner Denver ~~as Corporate Controller~~ in May ~~2014 and is responsible for controllership, accounting, financial reporting, financial systems and global shared-services for the Company.~~ 2018 as vice president of Gardner Denver Operating Systems.

				Prior to joining Gardner Denver, Mr. ~~Sweeney~~Weatherred served as ~~Senior Vice President~~vice president of Growth in the Danaher Business System Office of Danaher Corporation from 2013 to May 2018. Before that, he spent 12 years at Danaher in its Dental and ~~Chief Accounting Officer of J.C. Penney Company from September 2012 to September 2013.~~Product ID platforms in various general management, marketing and strategic account roles. Prior to ~~J.C. Penney,~~joining Danaher in 2002, Mr. ~~Sweeney served as Vice President~~Weatherred spent time at Honeywell and ~~Operational Controller at General Electric from 2008 to 2012~~Black & Decker in various sales, marketing and held multiple finance positions with increasing responsibility in General Electric’s Energy Division from 1997 through 2008. Mr. Sweeney graduated from the University of Missouri-Columbia with a degree in Accountancy.general management roles.

~~Kimberly J. Rubottom~~			54	Kimberly J. Rubottom has served as our Vice President of Human Resources since January 2015. Ms. Rubottom joined Gardner Denver in January 2014 as Vice President, Industrials segment focusing on Organization Management & Strategy. Prior to joining Gardner Denver, Ms. Rubottom served most recently as Underground Hard Rock Drilling Global Product Manager for Caterpillar Inc. from July 2011 to December 2013. Ms. Rubottom previously held multiple roles with increasing responsibility in Human Resources, Corporate Control, Business Management and Operations/Lean Management at Caterpillar Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc. and DBT GmbH from 1999 through 2011. Ms. RubottomMr. Weatherred earned a ~~Bachelor~~bachelor of ~~Business Administration, Accounting~~science in accounting from Pittsburg State University and ~~Finance~~a master of business administration from ~~Clarion University of Pennsylvania.~~Loyola University.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~PROPOSAL NO. 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC~~
~~ACCOUNTING FIRM~~

~~The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.~~

Although ratification is not required by our by-laws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

~~The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP unless you specify otherwise.~~

~~Audit and Non-Audit Fees~~

In connection with the audit of the 2017 financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte & Touche LLP which sets forth the terms by which Deloitte & Touche LLP would perform audit services for the Company.

The following tables sets forth the aggregate fees for professional services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for those periods, all of which were approved by the Audit Committee.

For the Years Ended
December 31,
(in thousands)

2017
2016
Fees:

Audit fees
$
2,952

$
3,019

Audit Related fees⁽¹⁾

773

75

Tax fees⁽²⁾

298

344

All other fees⁽³⁾

298

—

Total
$
4,321

$
3,438

~~(1)~~

~~Audit related fees include fees related to the Company’s public offerings, Sarbanes-Oxley readiness and a license for an accounting research tool.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Tax fees include fees for income tax compliance and transfer pricing services.~~

~~(3)~~

~~All other fees include fees related to professional services rendered in connection with the Company’s issuance of deferred stock units during 2017.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

The Audit Committee of the Board considered whether providing the non-audit services included in this table was compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence and concluded that it was.

~~YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF~~ ~~DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~ ~~FOR 2018.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~PROPOSAL NO. 3—NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to stockholder vote to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed on pages 22 to 42~~. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of this vote.~~

~~The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 3 is as follows:~~

“~~RESOLVED~~, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 22 to ~~30,~~ ~~as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on page~~ 12.

~~YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF~~ ~~THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~PROPOSAL NO. 4—NON-BINDING VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF~~
~~STOCKHOLDER VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION~~

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, stockholders are being asked to recommend, in a non-binding advisory vote, whether a non-binding stockholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers (that is, votes similar to the non-binding vote in Proposal No. 3 on page 19~~) should occur every one, two or three years. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of the vote.~~

~~In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information presented in connection with Proposal No. 3 on page~~ ~~19,~~ ~~the information on our compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages~~ 22 to 30 ~~as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on page~~ 12.

We believe a three-year frequency is most consistent with the Company’s approach to compensation. Our compensation committee reviews the Company’s executive compensation program regularly to ensure alignment with the goals of attracting and retaining individuals with the qualifications to meet the Company’s strategic objectives and creating value for our stockholders. Longer-term and forward-thinking plans and strategies often take more than a year or two to have a meaningful impact on the Company and translate into stockholder value. The Board believes an annual or biennial stockholder vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers would run counter to the goal of encouraging long-term planning and could instead lead to planning that focuses too heavily on short-term achievements. In addition, the Board believes a vote every three years will provide sufficient time for stockholders to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s larger, and more impactful, plans and strategies.

~~YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE EVERY “THREE YEARS”~~ ~~WITH RESPECT TO HOW FREQUENTLY A STOCKHOLDER VOTE TO APPROVE, IN A~~ ~~NON-BINDING VOTE, THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS~~ ~~SHOULD OCCUR.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this Proxy Statement under “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance ~~Matters—Board~~Matters-Board Committees and ~~Meetings—Audit~~Meetings-Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ~~Auditing Standard No. 1301 “Communications with Audit Committees.”~~and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2021 filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

William P. Donnelly, Chair

Gary D. Forsee

John Humphrey
~~William E. Kassling~~
~~Peter M. Stavros (Audit Committee member until February 7, 2018)~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017 and in the Company’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.~~

2021.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

			~~Peter Stavros,~~Kirk E. Arnold, Chair
			~~Nickolas Vande Steeg~~William P. Donnelly
			~~Joshua Weisenbeck~~Marc E. Jones

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

~~Introduction~~

This ~~section describes~~Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) outlines our executive compensation philosophy and ~~details~~objectives, describes the elements of our executive compensation ~~programs that cover~~program, and explains how the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board arrived at its compensation decisions for our 2021 named executive officers (“NEOs”).

listed below:

NEOs/Executive Officers			Title
Vicente Reynal			Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
Vikram Kini			Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)
Andrew Schiesl			Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer & Secretary
Enrique Miñarro Viseras			Senior Vice President & General Manager, Industrial Technologies and Services, EMEIA
Michael Weatherred			Senior Vice President, IR Execution Excellence (IRX) and Business Excellence

Executive Summary

Business Highlights

Despite the continued challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, direct material and logistics inflation and overall global supply chain disruptions, 2021 was a pivotal year for the Company. We solidified our growth story as we reshaped our portfolio to focus on mission-critical flow creation technologies and high growth sustainable end markets while establishing a new capital allocation strategy designed to enable us to consistently compound earnings over time. We continued our strong operational execution where the commercial effectiveness of our team, driven by our industry-leading Ingersoll Rand Execution Excellence (IRX) process, yielded a backlog at the end of the fourth quarter of 2021 that was our largest ever, and positioned us well for continued strong results in 2022.

In addition, we achieved significant accomplishments across each of our five strategic imperatives in 2021 including:

Deploy Talent. Our ~~NEOs~~employees think and act like owners because they are! As a result of our two landmark all employee share grants at the time of our initial public offering and the Merger, all of our employees at such times became owners. Incredibly, the common stock granted to employees through those grants has appreciated from $250 million at time of grant to over $500 million in value as of March 31, 2022. Furthermore, in 2021 we announced a plan to grant shares to new employees -- both those who join us as new hires or via acquisition -- to ensure that all of our employees have the chance to become owners.¹ We strongly believe that being an owner helps motivate our engaged employee base to make decisions each day that drive stockholder value creation. We can see the results of the power of ownership as our employee engagement score is up 17% over the last three years and now ranks in the top quartile of manufacturing organizations according to our engagement survey partner.

Expand Margins. By harnessing the power of IRX, we improved the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA margin 370 basis points since 2019, including an improvement of 160 basis points in 2021 alone. This drove 2021 record Adjusted EBITDA of $1,192 million, up 28%, with a margin of 23.1%.²

Operate Sustainably. We made tremendous progress on our sustainability initiatives in 2021. At the beginning of the year, we set a three-year goal to be recognized in the top quartile of industrial companies for ~~2017 are:~~sustainability. We achieved this goal in little more than one yearwith S&P Global and Sustainalytics both recognizing us as being in the top 15% of companies within our sector. This again demonstrates how we can leverage the power of IRX to drive performance across a multitude of different initiatives.

1	Employees must be full time and have one year of service to be eligible. Not available to employees where prohibited by local law or regulation or where such grant is required to be bargained for with an employee union unless such grant is agreed to as part of such bargaining.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric and represents net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain noncash, non-recurring and other adjustment items. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (Loss), see Annex A to this Proxy Statement. Adjusted EBITDA margin represents Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of Total Revenue. Comparison to 2019 is based on Supplemental Adjusted Revenue and Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA, which are non-GAAP metrics described in Annex A.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Vicente Reynal, our Chief Executive Officer;~~

Accelerate Growth. Our unique growth enablers, including Demand Generation, IIoT, and product and service innovation, strongly contributed to growth in the past year. Our Demand Generation engine generated 3x more marketing qualified leads compared to 2018; IIoT-enabled assets were up 250% year over year; and new product innovation increased 95% in 2021. All of this helped drive record orders of $5,765 million, up 31% over 2020, and record revenues of $5,152 million, up 19% over 2020.¹

~~Philip T. Herndon, our Vice President~~Allocate Capital Effectively. We secured approximately $2 billion in gross proceeds from the divestitures of Club Car and ~~Chief Financial Officer;~~High Pressure Solutions, and

redeployed over $1 billion to acquisitions in 2021, which represents over 6% of 2021 sales when annualized. We also repurchased $731 million in shares as part of KKR’s final equity sale, established a new $750 million share repurchase program, and initiated a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share during the fourth quarter.

Our purpose-led culture, the power of execution excellence through our IRX processes and our engaged employee base drove this level of execution on each of our strategic imperatives. This in turn led to total stockholder return performance of 35.9% during 2021, which was 84.8% greater than the total return of the S&P 500 Industrials during the same time period of 19.4%.

Stockholder Engagement and “Say on Pay” Results

We value our stockholders’ perspectives on our business and each year proactively interact with investors through numerous engagement activities. In 2021, these included our annual stockholder meeting, quarterly earnings calls, and various investor conferences and meetings, as well as the establishment of an investor relations newsletter distributed to stockholders on a regular basis. In addition, in August we held an investor conference call focused on ESG and our Sustainability Report, in September we held an investor conference call focused on our capital allocation strategy, and in November we held our first Investors’ Day conference since the Merger. Throughout 2021, management also proactively engaged directly with our top 40 stockholders with actively managed funds, representing approximately 80% of our stockholder base based on share ownership, through quarterly business updates, non-deal roadshows and investor conferences. This resulted in over 300 individual investor touchpoints with these stockholders where we were able to communicate Company strategy and long-term objectives.

At the Company’s annual meeting in June 2021, we received substantial support for our executive compensation program, with over 95% of the stockholders who voted on the “say on pay” proposal approving the compensation of our NEOs, consistent with the positive feedback we received in discussions with our stockholders throughout the year. Based on the positive feedback we received from our major stockholders, in addition to the vote result in 2021, we did not make substantive changes in 2021 to our compensation philosophy or the overall structure of our program. We will continue to keep an open dialogue with our stockholders to ensure that we have a regular pulse on investor perspectives. We hold advisory votes on the compensation of our NEOs every three ~~other most highly compensated executive officers who served~~years; we will hold our next advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs in ~~such capacities as of December 31, 2017, namely:~~2024.

~~Andrew Schiesl, our Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary;~~

1	Revenue comparison is against Supplemental Adjusted Revenue for 2020, which is a non-GAAP metric described in Annex A.

~~Neil D. Snyder, our Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Planning; and~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What Guides Our Program

~~Enrique Miñarro Viseras, Vice President and General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA~~

Executive Compensation ~~Objectives and~~ Philosophy

Our executive compensation philosophy is designed to attract and retain individuals with the qualifications to meet the Company’s strategic objectives and create value for our shareholders. We believe that the best way to align our executives with our objectives and create shareholder value is to emphasizecentered on two key ~~compensation principles: (1) significant equity participation~~tenets and ~~(2) pay-for-performance.~~

In February 2018, following an evaluation with the assistance of Pearl Meyer of equity-based incentives for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee adopted a new long-term equity incentive program (the “2018 LTI Program”). Under the 2018 LTI Program, our NEOs will receive annual equity awards, 50% of which will begrounded in the ~~form of time-vesting restricted stock units and 50% of which will be in~~following principles:

Compensation Elements

Our compensation philosophy is supported by the ~~form of time-vesting stock options. The~~ following charts illustrate our focus on equity participation by showing that 72% of our CEO’s expected 2018 target base salary, annual incentive, and long-term equity incentive compensation mix and 49% of our other NEOs’ expected 2018 mix is based on long-term equity incentives. See “Compensation Actions Taken in 2018—Long-Term Incentive Compensation”.

pay elements:

Element	Target Positioning vs. Market	Primary Objectives
Base Salary	At or below median	•	Attract and retain high-performing and experienced individuals
Base Salary	At or below median	•	Provide steady source of income
Annual Cash Incentives	At median	•	Motivate executives to achieve challenging short-term performance goals
Annual Cash Incentives	At median	•	Align with annual financial objectives
Long-Term Equity Incentives	Above the 50^th percentile	•	Align executives’ interests with those of stockholders
		•	Align with long-term business strategy
		•	Retain executive talent through multi-year vesting schedules
		•	Motivate sustainable performance that creates long-term value for stockholders
		•	Foster our Purpose and Values to build teams that think and act like owners

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~Our commitment to aligning the interests~~

The following charts illustrate that a majority of ~~our executives to the interests of our shareholders through equity participation~~NEO annual target total direct compensation (“TDC”) is further evidenced by the fact that in 2017 we adopted what we believe is a market-leading stock ownership and retention policy for our executives and non-employee directors that combines robust stock ownership requirements with retention requirements. See “Stock Ownership and Retention Policy” below. All of our NEOs maintain a significant equity stake in the Company and currently exceed their respective ownership requirements through ownership of vested and exercisable stock options and/or direct investments in our common stock.

In addition to equity participation, we strongly believe in a pay-for-performance culture. This is evidenced by the fact that our annual cash incentive program is 100% based on the financial performance of the Company and its business units and that it accounts for 50% of the expected total cash compensation ofperformance-based. For our CEO, ~~and on~~89% of total compensation is delivered in variable compensation with the vast majority delivered in long-term incentives. On average, ~~41%~~variable compensation for our other NEOs ~~in each case when paid out at target. When paid out at the maximum payout (capped at 200%~~represents 74% of target), this percentage increases to 67% and 58%, respectively. Also, our executives receive no payout for below threshold performance and we believe that our threshold at 95% of target is more challenging than typical market practice. See “—Executive Compensation Program Elements—Cash Bonus Opportunities—Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity”. Even more importantly, when our short-term cash incentive is combined with our long term equity incentive, it results in 84% of our CEO’s and 70% of our NEOs’ compensation being variable performancetotal compensation.

~~In addition to equity compensation and our annual cash incentive opportunity, we provide NEOs a combination of the following other compensation components:~~

~~Base salary - Fixed pay that is market competitive and sufficient to engage high caliber talent;~~

~~Broad-based employee benefits – Fixed pay intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and welfare security; and~~

Severance and other benefits payable upon certain terminations of employment or a change in control - Encourages the continued attention and dedication of our NEOs and provides reasonable individual security to enable our NEOs to focus on our best interests, particularly when considering strategic alternatives.

In 2017 we did not make any equity grants to our NEOs believing that the equity grants made in prior years were sufficiently retentive and fostered the necessary level of alignment with shareholder interests. See “—Executive Compensation Program Elements—Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards”.

~~Strong~~ Compensation Governance Practices and Policies

Within the context of the compensation philosophy and the Company’s business objectives, the Compensation Committee engages in an ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation programs. In connection with this review, the Compensation

The Committee has adopted the following practices and policies reflecting what it believes to be a best practices approach to executive compensation.

~~Compensation Determination~~

What We Do		What We Don’t Do
	Significant Portion of Pay Focused on Long-Term Value Creation		No Tax Gross-Ups in Connection with Change-in-Control Severance
	50% of Annual Long-Term Incentive Compensation Delivered in Performance-Vesting Equity Awards		No Executive Pensions
	Market-Leading Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines		No Fixed-Term Employment Agreements
	Incentive Plan Goals Aligned with Stockholder Interests		No Stock Option Repricing
	Capped Incentive Opportunities		No Hedging of Company Stock
	Mitigation of Risk Through Compensation Risk Assessments
	Independent Compensation Consultant
	Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy

The Decision-Making Process ~~and Compensation Consultant Independence~~

~~Prior to our initial public offering, our Compensation~~

The Committee ~~historically made all~~oversees the executive compensation ~~decisions, including determinations as to the compensation of~~program for our NEOs. ~~From~~The Committee works closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the ~~date~~effectiveness of ~~our initial public offering,~~ the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. For additional information regarding the Committee, see “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters―Board Committees and Meetings―Compensation Committee.”

The Role of the Committee. The Committee ~~has been responsible for determining~~ensures that the executive compensation program supports the Company’s business goals and aligns with stockholder interests. The Committee annually reviews NEO compensation levels by considering various factors, including:

The relative importance of

each NEO’s role and responsibilities

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)~~

How the NEO has performed relative to these roles and ~~other executive officers~~responsibilities

Compensation practices of Peer Group companies (as defined below)

Overall company performance

Retention and ~~approving or recommending such compensation to the Board~~succession considerations

The Role of ~~Directors. Because of his daily involvement with the executive team, our~~Management. Our CEO makes recommendations to the ~~Compensation~~ Committee regarding compensation for the executive officers other than himself. No member of management participates in discussions with the ~~Compensation~~ Committee regarding his or her own compensation.

~~In connection with our initial public offering, we engaged~~

The Role of the Independent Consultant. The Committee has retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), a compensation consulting firm, to assist usit in evaluating the elements and levels of our executive compensation, including base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and equity-based incentives for our executive officers. In ~~February 2018,~~April 2022, the ~~Compensation~~ Committee determined that Pearl Meyer is independent from management and that Pearl Meyer’s work has not raised any conflicts of interest.

Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Committee and the Committee has the sole authority to approve Pearl Meyer’s compensation and may terminate the relationship at any time.

During 2021, Pearl Meyer advised the Committee on a variety of topics, including competitive market assessment for executive and non-employee director compensation levels, compensation peer group review, retirement equity vesting provisions, review of governance matters pertaining to executive and employee compensation, and the structure of short- and long-term incentive programs.

Peer Group.The Committee believes it is important to understand current trends in compensation practices and pay levels for companies that are comparable to Ingersoll Rand. To assist the Committee in this analysis, the Committee, together with its independent consultant and input from management, develops a compensation Peer Group of comparable companies against which it performs benchmarking (the “Peer Group”).

Together with its independent compensation consultant and input from management, the Compensation Committee ~~did not benchmark 2017 compensation against a peer group. However, over the course of the second half of 2017 and early 2018, Pearl Meyer~~ developed a compensation ~~peer group, conducted a competitive market assessment~~Peer Group of 13 companies. Companies chosen are comparable in revenue and ~~developed recommendations~~enterprise value to the Company, as the Committee believes revenue and enterprise value are key determinants of compensation levels. Companies selected generally have revenue of 1/2x - 2x of Ingersoll Rand’s revenue and enterprise value. In addition to size, companies are in comparable industries where we source executive talent. After taking these considerations into account plus additional input from its compensation consultant, the Committee decided to use the following Peer Group to help set compensation levels for 2021:

AMETEK, Inc.	Avery Dennison Corporation	Celanese Corporation
Dover Corporation	Flowserve Corporation	Fortive Corporation
IDEX Corporation	Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.	Oshkosh Corporation
Parker-Hannifin Corporation	Pentair Plc	Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Xylem, Inc.

The Committee does not rely solely on data from the ~~2018 LTI Program. See “Compensation Actions Taken~~Peer Group in ~~2018—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”~~

establishing compensation levels and practices, but uses it to support the implementation of the Company’s compensation philosophy and the application of the factors described above when setting executive compensation. Given the Company’s focus on delivering long-term value creation for our stockholders, the Committee generally targets cash compensation of the NEOs at or below the median of the Peer Group and long-term equity incentive compensation greater than the 50^th percentile of the Peer Group. Additionally, the Committee may also consider survey compensation data based on companies of similar size to Ingersoll Rand.

2021 Executive Compensation Program ~~Elements~~

in Detail

Base ~~Salaries~~

Salary

Base salary is the only fixed component of ~~the Company’s NEOs’~~NEO cash compensation. An NEO’s base salary is related to the individual’s level of responsibility and provides them with a level of cash income predictability and stability with respect to a portion of their total compensation. The ~~Compensation~~ Committee believes that base salaries for executives should reflect competitive levels of pay and factors unique to each executive such as experience and breadth of responsibilities, performance, individual skill set, time in the role and internal pay parity. Base salaries are

TABLE OF CONTENTS

reviewed annually or at other times when appropriate (for example, promotions, changes in job scope and/or responsibilities, etc.) and may be increased from time to time pursuant to such review. ~~In connection~~

Consistent with our ~~annual review, we determined~~philosophy to ~~increase~~focus on long-term variable pay versus fixed cash compensation, the Committee generally established 2021 base salary rates at or below the median of Peer Group salary levels. In light of the economic uncertainty at the time 2021 compensation decisions were made, including the impacts of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee decided for 2021 to maintain base salaries for the majority of ~~each of our~~executive officers at 2020 rates.

Consistent with this approach, only two NEOs ~~by not more than 3% based on their~~received base salary increases in 2021. Mr. Kini’s was a merit-based adjustment intended to recognize his strong individual performance ~~in 2016, effective April 2017.~~and to improve alignment with market levels, as his 2020 base salary rate was below market at the 25^th percentile level. Mr. Miñarro ~~Viseras is based in Germany and compensated in Euros; accordingly, his~~Viseras’ base salary increase was ~~based on~~intended to recognize: (i) his ~~salary in Euros.~~ long-term strategic importance to the Company, and (ii) the end of a legacy tax gross-up perquisite related to the reimbursement of schooling fees for his children.

The following table reflects the base ~~salaries~~salary rates of our NEOs as of December 31, ~~2017.~~

Base Salary as of
December 31, 2016
Base Salary as of
December 31, 2017
Vicente Reynal, Chief Executive Officer
$
750,000

$
766,500

Philip T. Herndon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
$
400,000

$
409,000

Andrew Schiesl, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
$
450,000

$
460,000

Neil D. Snyder, Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Planning
$
345,000

$
353,000

Enrique Miñarro Viseras, Vice President and General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA⁽¹⁾
$
304,288

$
337,814

2021:

NEO	Base Salary Rate as of 12/31/20	Base Salary Rate as of 12/31/21	% Increase
Vicente Reynal	$1,000,000	$1,000,000	—%
Vikram Kini	$450,000	$500,000	11%
Andrew Schiesl	$500,000	$500,000	—%
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽¹⁾	$440,000	$490,000	6%
Michael Weatherred	$415,000	$415,000	—%

(1)

Mr. Miñarro Viseras is based in Europe and is compensated in Euros. ~~We converted his 2016~~His 2020 base salary ~~(which~~ was ~~275,000 Euros)~~approved by the Committee at a rate of $440,000 USD per year, which was translated to ~~U.S. dollars~~€406,000 EUR at the then-current exchange rate. His 2021 base salary was approved by the Committee at a rate of $490,000 USD per year, which, in an effort to eliminate any extreme fluctuation in exchange rates, was translated to €432,125 EUR at the 5-year average exchange rate as of ~~1.1065, which was~~December 31, 2020. The percent increase for Mr. Miñarro Viseras reflects the ~~average monthly translation rate for 2016. We converted his 2017 base salary (which was 281,500 Euros)~~calculation in local currencies to ~~U.S. dollars at an~~mute the impact of exchange rate ~~of 1.20048, which was the end of month translation rate, December 2017.~~fluctuations.

~~Cash Bonus Opportunities~~

Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity

~~In order to~~

To tie a significant portion of their annual cash compensation to actual performance, each NEO is eligible for an annual cash bonus award under our ~~management incentive plan~~Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”), based on the achievement of our financial goals for the Company and their respective business units.

A target annual bonus opportunity, expressed as a percentage of an NEO’s unreduced base salary ~~in effect~~rate at year-end, is established ~~within certain NEOs’ offer letters and employment agreements~~annually and may be adjusted from time to time by the ~~Compensation~~ Committee in connection with ana NEO’s promotion or performance. The table below shows the 2021 target annual

cash bonus opportunities for each of the NEOs.

NEO			Target Bonus Opportunity (as a % of Salary)
Vicente Reynal			150%
Vikram Kini			85%
Andrew Schiesl			75%
Enrique Miñarro Viseras			85%
Michael Weatherred			75%

2021 Performance Measures. The MIP pays out to participants based on levels of performance against financial metrics established by the Committee. To be eligible for a payout, a participant must be employed by the Company through the payment date or have an Approved Retirement (as defined below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control―Treatment of Outstanding Equity Awards in the Event of Termination of Employment or Change in Control―Equity awards granted 2018-2021”) on or after the end of the year but before the payment date. To ensure the right level of accountability and line-of-sight, the performance measures vary depending upon the role and responsibility of the NEO. For 2021, annual cash bonus awards for Corporate NEOs (Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and Weatherred) were based on the achievement of overall corporate performance, as described below. Mr. Miñarro Viseras’

TABLE OF CONTENTS

annual cash bonus ~~for 2017 for Messrs. Reynal and Herndon~~award was ~~100% of their respective base salaries, for Mr. Schiesl was 75% of his base salary, for Mr. Snyder was 50% of his base salary and for Mr. Miñarro Viseras was 45% of his base salary.~~

We generally believe that tying our corporate level NEOs’ bonuses to company-wide performance goals encourages those NEOs to focus on company-wide priorities, and that tying the bonuses of our NEOs at the business segment and business unit level to business segment goals and business unit goals, respectively, rewards these NEOs for achievements with respect to their business segments and units. In 2017, the Compensation Committee decided to base MIP awards for Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Snyderbased in part on the achievement of overall Industrial Technologies and Services (“ITS”) group performance ~~of our Industrials segment because each serves~~(excluding the power tools division) and in ~~roles at both the corporate level and the Industrials segment level and the Compensation Committee wanted them to continue to focus~~part on the ~~objectives~~achievement of Industrials Technologies and Services EMEIA (“ITS EMEIA”) performance, as described below, to reflect his leadership of the Industrials ~~segment since it typically accounts for a significant portion of our total revenue.~~EMEIA business unit and his ability to impact the overall Industrials Group A detailed description of the ~~2017~~2021 MIP ~~metrics~~design and the calculation of the actual amounts paid to each of our NEOs ~~are~~is provided below.

~~We chose to use~~

For 2021, 75% of MIP payouts were based on Adjusted EBITDA asperformance. The Committee determined that ~~term is defined elsewhere in this Annual Report~~a plan focused on ~~Form 10-K~~Adjusted EBITDA was appropriate because ~~we believe that~~ it provides a reliable indicator of both our strategic growth and the strength of our overall financial results.

~~Actual amounts paid~~ Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as further adjusted to ~~Messrs. Reynal, Herndon~~exclude certain non-cash, nonrecurring and ~~Snyder under~~other adjustment items. As a balance to our profitability metric and in support of a focus on operational efficiency, the ~~2017 MIP were calculated by multiplying their target annual bonus for 2017 by the sum of (1) 75% multiplied by the weighted average~~remaining 25% of the 2021 MIP payouts were based on Net Operating Working Capital¹ as a Percentage of Revenue.

For our Corporate NEOs, Corporate performance against both financial metrics is determined based on achievement for the Company. For our NEO at the ITS group level, Mr. Miñarro Viseras, performance against both financial metrics is based 30% on the total ITS segment (excluding the power tools division), and 70% on the ITS EMEIA region business unit.

The following table details the MIP payout ~~percentages~~percentage associated with ~~our achievement~~a corresponding performance level against the Adjusted EBITDA targets for ~~the MIP Business Units (as defined below)~~our NEOs and ~~(2) 25% multiplied by the payout percentage associated with our achievement~~ against the ~~Industrials Segment Adjusted EBITDA target.~~Net Operating Working Capital as a Percentage of Revenue targets for our Corporate NEOs. The “MIP Business Units” include Energy P&IP, Energy Nash/Garo, Energy Emco, Industrials Americas, Industrials EMEA, Industrials APAC, and Medical. The weighting for each MIP Business Unit is determined by dividing fiscal 2017 Adjusted EBITDA budget for each business unit by the sum of fiscal 2017 Adjusted EBITDA budgets for all the MIP Business Units. To calculate the composite payout percentage for ~~all MIP Business Units, each MIP Business Unit’s corresponding weighting is multiplied by the payout percentage associated with actual 2017 Adjusted EBITDA achievement against~~performance between such levels determined on a linear basis:

Performance Level	Adjusted EBITDA Performance % of Target	Net Operating Working Capital % of Total Revenue*	Payout % of Target
Below Threshold	<90%	<20.9%	0%
Threshold	90%	20.9%	50%
Target	100%	19.8%	100%
Maximum	110%	18.7%	200%

*Goals reflect Total Company figures that ~~business unit’s respective Adjusted EBITDA budget~~applied to Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and ~~the resulting amounts are summed.~~

We believe Adjusted EBITDA targets set for the MIP Business Units in 2017 provided reasonably achievable, but challenging goals for our NEOs and the other MIP participants at the corporate level. In addition, we believe the Industrials Segment Adjusted EBITDA target set in 2017 provided reasonably achievable, but challenging goals for our NEOs and other MIP participants in the Industrials segment.

~~Actual amounts paid to~~Weatherred. For Mr. Schiesl under the 2017 MIP were calculated by multiplying his target annual bonus for 2017 by the weighted average of the payout percentages associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA targets for the MIP Business Units.

~~For our NEO at the~~Miñarro Viseras’ business unit, level, Mr. Miñarro Viseras, the MIP award is tied to the financial results of his business segment and his business unit measured by Adjusted EBITDA. The actual amount paid to Mr. Miñarro Viseras under the 2017 MIP was calculated by multiplying his target annual bonus for 2017 by the sum of (1) 50% multiplied by the payout percentage associated with our achievement against the Industrials Segment Adjusted EBITDAthreshold, target, and (2) 50% multiplied by the payout percentage associated with our achievement against the Industrials EMEA Adjusted EBITDA target. We believe the Industrials EMEA Adjusted EBITDA target set in 2017 provided a reasonably achievable, but challenging goal for Mr. Miñarro Viserasmaximum goals were 28.2%, 26.8%, and ~~other MIP participants at our Industrials EMEA business unit.~~

The Adjusted EBITDA payout percentage for each of our segments and business units was determined by calculating actual achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA performance targets based on the pre-established scale set forth in the table below.

Achievement of Performance Target
Payout Percentage
Less than 95%
0%
95%
75%
100%
100%
110%
200%

25.3%, respectively.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

No cash incentive award would have been paid to our NEOs whose awards were based partially or entirely on the performance of our MIP Business Units unless actual performance for fiscal 2017 for at least one of the MIP Business Units was at or above 95% of the applicable Adjusted EBITDA target (or, in the case of Mr. Miñarro Viseras, if the performance of our Industrials segment for 2017 was at or above the Adjusted EBITDA target for our Industrials segment). Adjusted EBITDA results are adjusted to the extent that actual foreign exchange rates by country differ by more than 5% of budgeted foreign exchange rates. ~~For performance percentages between the levels set forth above, the resulting payout percentage is adjusted on a linear basis.~~ In addition to setting Adjusted EBITDA targets for our business units, we set an annual corporate expense budget each year and any difference between actual and budgeted corporate expense ismay be allocated to the Adjusted EBITDA at our business ~~units at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.~~units. While there are no individual goals for purposes of MIP award payments, the ~~Compensation~~ Committee, on the recommendation of Mr. Reynal, may adjust an incentive payment upward or downward for performance-related ~~reasons.~~reasons for other NEOs. In addition, the ~~Compensation~~ Committee has discretion to adjust MIP award payments for unanticipated events. For ~~2017,~~2021, the ~~Compensation~~ Committee did not ~~make any discretionary adjustments to~~adjust the calculated MIP award ~~payments.~~payments for any of our NEOs.

1	Defined as Accounts Receivables and Contract Assets + Inventory (excluding LIFO) - Accounts Payable - Contract Liabilities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth our actual payout percentage achieved with respect to each performance metric applicable to our NEOs and illustrates the calculation of the annual cash incentive awards payable to our NEOs under the ~~2017~~2021 MIP in light of these performance results.

Adjusted EBITDA Payout Percentage

Name
2017 Base
Salary
Target
Bonus %
Target
Bonus
Amount
Industrials
Industrials
EMEA
Weighted
Average of
Business
Units⁽¹⁾
Weighted
Payout
Percentage
Actual
Bonus Paid
Vicente Reynal⁽²⁾
$
766,500

100
%
$
766,500

150
%

N/A

142
%

144
%
$
1,103,760

Philip T. Herndon⁽²⁾
$
409,000

100
%
$
409,000

150
%

N/A

142
%

144
%
$
588,960

Andrew Schiesl
$
460,000

75
%
$
345,000

N/A

N/A

142
%

142
%
$
489,900

Neil Snyder
$
353,000

50
%
$
176,500

150
%

142
%

144
%
$
254,160

Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽³⁾
$
337,814

45
%
$
152,016

150
%

120
%

N/A

135
%
$
205,222

				Adjusted EBITDA (75%)		NWC % of Revenue (25%)
NEO	2021 Base Salary Rate	Target Bonus %	Target Bonus Amount	2021 % of Tgt Achieved	Calc’d Payout %	2021 Actual	Calc’d Payout %	Overall Payout Factor	2021 Bonus Payout
Vicente Reynal	$1,000,000	150%	$1,500,000	108%	176%	18.0%	200%	182%	$2,730,000
Vikram Kini	$500,000	85%	$425,000	108%	176%	18.0%	200%	182%	$773,500
Andrew Schiesl	$500,000	75%	$375,000	108%	176%	18.0%	200%	182%	$682,500
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽²⁾	$490,764	85%	$417,150	99%	88%	24.0%	200%	129%	$538,123
Michael Weatherred	$415,000	75%	$311,250	108%	176%	18.0%	200%	182%	$566,475

(1)

~~(1)~~

~~Represents the weighted average of the~~For Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and Weatherred, reflects achievement and calculated payout ~~percentages associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA~~factors vs. targets for the ~~MIP Business Units.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Messrs. Reynal’s, Herndon’s~~Company. For Mr. Miñarro Viseras, reflects achievement and ~~Snyder’s 2017 MIP opportunities were~~calculated payouts factors based ~~75%~~30% on the ~~weighted average of~~total ITS segment (excluding the ~~payout percentages associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA targets for the MIP Business Units~~power tools division), and ~~25%~~70% on the ~~payout percentage associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA target for the Industrials segment.~~ITS EMEIA region.

~~(3)~~(2)

Mr. Miñarro ~~Viseras’s 2017 MIP opportunity~~Viseras is based in Europe and compensated in Euros. Regardless of the prevailing exchange rate in effect at the actual time of payment, for consistency with the values reported in the “Summary Compensation Table”, all values have been converted to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of 1.1357, which was ~~based 50% on~~ the payout percentage associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA target for the Industrials segment and 50% on the payout percentage associated with our achievement against the Adjusted EBITDA target for the Industrials EMEA business unit.5-year average exchange rate as of December 31, 2020.

~~IPO Bonuses~~

For their extraordinary efforts in 2017 in connection with our initial public offering, the Compensation Committee in February 2018 determined to award each of Messrs. Reynal, Herndon, Schiesl and Snyder a one-time discretionary IPO bonus. The IPO bonuses were awarded in the following amounts: Mr. Reynal - $225,000; Mr. Herndon - $125,000; Mr. Schiesl - $100,000; and Mr. Snyder - $75,000.

~~Sign-on Bonuses~~

From time to time, we may award sign-on bonuses in connection with the commencement of an NEO’s employment with us. Sign-on bonuses are used only when necessary to attract highly skilled officers to the Company. Generally, they are used to provide an incentive to candidates to leave their current employers or may be used to offset the loss of unvested compensation that they may forfeit as a result of leaving their current employers. Sign-on bonuses are typically subject to a clawback obligation if the officer voluntarily terminates his or her employment with us prior to the first anniversary of the employment commencement date. We did not award any sign-on bonuses to our NEOs in 2017.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

~~Prior~~

Our long-term incentive awards, established through our Ingersoll Rand Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (our “2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”), are intended to our initial public offering, we granted long-term equity-based awards to our executives that were designed to align executives’ and shareholders’ interests, promote performance through a broad ownership mindset, incentivize ourdrive executives to ~~remain~~deliver strong stock performance, align our executives’ compensation with long-term value creation, and to attract and retain highly-qualified executives. The details of these awards are as follows:

50% in ~~our service~~Performance Share Units (PSUs). The PSUs have a 3-year performance period that runs from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023 (the “Performance Period”) and ~~align~~performance is measured based on Relative TSR vs. S&P 500 Industrials as follows:

○	Threshold Performance: 35^th percentile positioning vs. index = 50% payout

○	Target Performance: 55^th percentile positioning vs. index = 100% payout

○	Superior Performance: 75^th (or greater) percentile positioning vs. index = 200% payout (capped)

The payout under the ~~interests~~PSUs is capped at 100% if the Company’s TSR is negative.

TSR is calculated as the appreciation in the price per share of ~~our executives with those~~

a company’s common stock during the Performance Period (assuming any dividends or distributions are reinvested), expressed as a percentage. Relative TSR is based on the percentile rank of the Company’s TSR against the TSRs of the companies and entities that, on January 1, 2021, comprised the S&P 500 Industrials.¹

25% in Time-Vesting Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). RSUs vest in equal, annual installments over a four-year period.

25% in Time-Vesting Stock Options. Stock Options vest in equal, annual installments over a four-year period, and expire 10 years from the grant date.

If prior to the end of the Performance Period a company or entity that is in the S&P 500 Industrials on January 1, 2021, ceases to publicly report a share price for the security used to determine the stock price at the beginning of the Performance Period, and such company or entity has not become “Insolvent” (as defined in the applicable award agreement), such company or entity will be excluded from the ranking. In addition, if a company or entity that is in the S&P 500 Industrials on January 1, 2021, becomes Insolvent prior to the end of the Performance Period, then such company or entity will be treated as having a cumulative TSR of negative one hundred percent (-100%).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Total target values for annual equity awards granted in 2021 for each NEO are shown below:

NEO	PSUs (50%)	RSUs (25%)	Stock Options (25%)
Vicente Reynal	$3,350,000	$1,675,000	$1,675,000
Vikram Kini	$550,000	$275,000	$275,000
Andrew Schiesl	$475,000	$237,500	$237,500
Enrique Miñarro Viseras	$550,000	$275,000	$275,000
Michael Weatherred	$350,000	$175,000	$175,000

Target annual equity award values were determined based on our competitive market analysis and our compensation philosophy, which calibrates award levels between market median and 75^th percentile.

These grant amounts were translated into a target number of ~~our ultimate equity holders. The awards we granted to our NEOs under our long-term incentive program (our “Long-Term Incentive Program”) were in the form~~performance share units, shares of restricted stock and stock options ~~with 50% of each award vesting based on time-based vesting conditions (“Time Options”)~~by taking such dollar amount and 50% of each award vesting based on performance-based vesting conditions (“Performance Options”). The stock options generally vest, if at all, ratably over a three- to five-year period, subject to continued employment throughdividing it by the ~~applicable vesting date and, in~~per share or per option “fair value” that was used for reporting the case of the Performance Options, achievement of the applicable performance criteria. See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017—Terms of Equity Awards—Long-Term Incentive Plan Grants.” The Compensation Committee determined that granting our NEOs stock options would meet our goals of fostering a culture of performance and commitment to our Company. Stock options serve as components of performance-based compensation ~~because they only provide value to our NEOs if the value of our stock appreciates. All equity-based awards under our Long-Term Incentive Program were granted under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan.~~

~~In addition to granting them long-term equity-based awards, we have given our executive officers the opportunity to, and in some cases, in connection~~expense associated with the ~~commencement~~grant under applicable accounting guidance. This “fair value” was based in part on the per share closing price of ~~their employment with us, have required them to, make meaningful investments in~~ our common stock ~~subject to satisfaction~~on the NYSE on the date of ~~applicable securities law requirements. See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary~~grant.

Other Compensation ~~Table~~Practices and ~~Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017—Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements.”~~

In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted a new incentive plan, the Gardner Denver Holdings, Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, pursuant to which we will grant our future long-term equity incentive awards. See “Compensation Actions Taken in 2018—Long-Term Incentive Compensation” below.

~~Benefits and Perquisites~~

While our compensation philosophy is to focus on performance-based forms of compensation while providing only minimal executive benefits and perquisites, we provide to all of our employees, including our NEOs, broad-based employee benefitsPolicies that ~~are intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and welfare security. These include:~~

~~a 401(k) savings plan;~~

~~medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage; and~~

~~dependent care and healthcare flexible spending accounts.~~

~~401(k) Plan~~

Align Our U.S. eligible employees, including our NEOs, participate in the Gardner Denver, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) plan”), which is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan. For employees hired after January 1, 2014, enrollment in the 401(k) plan is automatic for employees who meet eligibility requirements unless they decline participation. Under the 401(k) plan, we match 100% of the first 6% of a participant’s salary contributions to the 401(k) plan. Participants are 100% vested in employee and matching contributions. The maximum contribution to the 401(k) plan is 100% of an employee's annual eligible compensation, subject to regulatory and plan limitations.

~~Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan~~

In addition to the 401(k) plan, U.S. employees with a salary grade of 20 or higher (generally senior managers and above), including the NEOs other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, are eligible to participate in the Gardner Denver, Inc. Supplemental Excess Defined Contribution Plan (the “Excess Contribution Plan”), which is funded through a Rabbi Trust. This plan provides participants with a similar level of benefits afforded to all other eligible employees who are not subject to the limitations imposed by the IRS on our tax-qualified 401(k) plan.

Eligible employees may contribute to the Excess Contribution Plan when they exceed the annual IRS pre-tax contribution limits and the annual catch-up contribution limit for participants age 50 or over. Under the Excess Contribution Plan, we match 100% of the first 6% of a participant’s salary contributions to the Excess Contribution Plan. Company matching contributions under the Excess Contribution Plan are contributed in the form of cash rather than our common stock. All employee and Company matching contributions are fully vested immediately.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Limited Perquisites~~

Executive perquisites are not part of our general compensation philosophy, however we provide limited perquisites and personal benefits that are not generally available to all employees when necessary to attract top talent. These are typically set forth in the offer letters or employment agreements we enter into with our executive officers. See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017—Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements.” For example, in 2017, per his employment agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to international school assistance and use of a company car. Mr. Snyder was also provided with a housing allowance. In addition, from time to time, we provide tax gross-ups on perquisites we provide in order to allow our NEOs to ~~enjoy the full benefit of the perquisite we are providing.~~

~~Severance and Change in Control Agreements~~

The Company believes that reasonable and appropriate severance and change in control benefits are necessary in order to be competitive in the Company’s executive attraction and retention efforts. As discussed above, the offer letters we enter into with our NEOs provide for certain payments, rights and benefits to the NEOs upon an involuntary termination of employment without Cause (as defined in “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control-Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants” below) from the Company or a termination by the NEO for Good Reason (as defined in “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control-Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants” below). In addition, our equity award agreements provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control in certain circumstances, as more fully described above under “—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017—Terms of Equity Awards.”

~~Employment Agreements~~

We do not typically enter into employment agreements with our NEOs; however, we entered into an employment agreement and offer letter with Mr. Miñarro Viseras and offer letters setting forth initial compensation and benefits, as well as severance terms, with each of our other NEOs. Full descriptions of the material terms of the employment agreement and offer letter we entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras and the offer letters we entered into with Messrs. Reynal, Herndon, Schiesl and Snyder are presented below in “—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017.”

~~Risk Management~~

The Compensation Committee conducts a thorough review of all incentive programs and confirms that our executives are not incented to focus on short-term stock performance or take excessive risk in managing the business. In particular, long-term incentive awards, as a significant portion of total direct compensation and robust stock holding requirements, are structured to align management with the long-term health of the business.

Our Stockholders

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

To align the interests of our management and directors with those of our stockholders, the Board of Directors concluded that certain of our ~~executive officers~~executives (the “Covered Executives”) and non-employee directors should have a significant financial stake in the Company’s stock. To further that goal, we implemented market-leading stock ownership guidelines (the “Guidelines”) in 2017, ~~(the “Guidelines”).~~the year we completed our initial public offering. The Covered Executives ~~will be~~and non-employee directors are required to hold a specific level of equity ownership as outlined ~~below:~~

below.

Covered Executives: The Guidelines ~~will~~ apply to the Covered Executives in ~~the following Tiers:~~

~~Tier One:~~	~~Chief Executive Officer~~
~~Tier Two:~~	~~Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel~~
~~Tier Three:~~	~~P&L and Corporate Leaders~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Covered Executives’ Stock Ownership Multiples~~:three tiers. The stock ownership levels under the Guidelines, expressed as a multiple of the Covered Executive’s annual base ~~annual~~ salary rate as of January 1^st of the year, are as follows:

Tier ~~One:~~	~~10 times base salary~~Covered Executives	Multiple of Salary
Tier ~~Two:~~One	~~5 times base salary~~Chief Executive Officer	10x Salary
Tier ~~Three:~~Two	~~3 times base salary~~Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel	5x Salary
Tier Three	P&L and Corporate Leaders	3x Salary

Retention Requirement: There is no required time period within which a Covered Executive must attain the applicable stock ownership level under the Guidelines. However, until the applicable ownership level is achieved, Covered Executives must retain 75% of net shares granted to them. Once the ownership guideline is met, Covered Executives must retain 30% of net shares granted to ~~them; however, this~~them. This requirement drops to 20% for a Covered Executive upon the earlier of a (1) such Covered Executive reaching the age of 55 and (2) such covered executive achieving 10 years of service with the ~~Company and~~Company. The requirement terminates upon the earlier of (1) such Covered Executive reaching the age of 60 and (2) such covered executive achieving 15 years of service with the Company.

The shares counted toward these ownership requirements ~~includes~~include shares owned outright and vested stock options. The retention requirement applies to all prior and future grants.

These ownership requirements are set at levels that the Company believes are robust given the Covered Executives’ respective salaries and responsibilities.

Non-Employee Directors: Our non-employee directors are required to hold 75% of net shares granted to them under our benefit plans until they own equity equal to five times their annual cash retainers. Once the ownership guideline is met, directors must retain 30% of the net shares granted to them under our benefit plans until their retirement.

As of January 1, ~~2018,~~2022, all of our NEOs and then serving directors who were with the Company for at least one year were in compliance with the applicable stock ownership levels under the Guidelines.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Hedging and Pledging Policies

The Company’s Securities Trading Policy requires executive officers and directors to consult the Company’s General Counsel prior to engaging in transactions involving the Company’s securities. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy prohibits directors and executive officers from hedging or monetization transactions including, but not limited to, through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, variable forward contracts, equity swaps, puts, calls, and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities. The Company’s Securities Trading Policy limits the pledging of Company securities to those situations approved by the Company’s General Counsel.

Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy

We have adopted a clawback policy for incentive compensation. The Committee determined that it may be appropriate to recover annual and/or long-term incentive compensation in specified situations. Under the policy, if the Committee determines that incentive compensation of its current and former Section ~~162(m)~~16 officers (or any other employee designated by the Board or the Committee) was overpaid, in whole or in part, as a result of a restatement of the ~~Internal Revenue Code~~

We expect to be able to claim the benefit of a special exemption rule that applies to compensation paid (or compensation in respect of equity awards such as stock options granted) during a specified transition period following our initial public offering. This transition period was previously anticipated to potentially extend until our first annual stockholders meeting that occurs in 2021 pursuant to regulations under the Section 162(m)reported financial results of the ~~Internal Revenue Code~~Company or any of ~~1986, as amended (the “Code”). However,~~its segments due to material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements (unless due to a change in accounting policy or applicable law), then the ~~recently enacted Tax Cut and Jobs Act amended Section 162(m)~~Committee will determine, in its discretion, whether to seek to recover or cancel any overpayment of the Code in several respects, including the elimination the “performance-based compensation” exception under Section 162(m) of the Code for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Pending further guidance under Section 162(m) of the Code, it is unclear whether the post-IPO transition period exception under Section 162(m) will continue to apply to us forincentive compensation paid or ~~awards granted~~awarded during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare the restatement.

Other Benefits

While our compensation philosophy is to focus on performance-based forms of compensation while providing only minimal executive benefits and perquisites, we provide to all our employees, including our NEOs, broad-based employee benefits that are intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and welfare security. These include:

a 401(k) savings plan;

medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage; and

dependent care and healthcare flexible spending accounts.

401(k) Plan

Our U.S. eligible employees, including our NEOs other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, participate in ~~2018 or beyond. Once applicable guidance~~the Ingersoll Rand Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) plan”), which is ~~released,~~a tax-qualified retirement savings plan. Eligible employees hired on and after January 1, 2014, are automatically enrolled in the 401(k) plan to make pre-tax salary contributions, unless they decline participation. Under the 401(k) plan, we ~~expect the Compensation Committee to consider the implications of Section 162(m) and such guidance in its future compensation decisions.~~

~~Compensation Actions Taken in 2018~~

~~Long-Term Incentive Compensation~~

~~In February 2018, following an evaluation with the assistance of Pearl Meyer~~match 100% of the ~~equity-based incentives for~~first 6% of a participant’s eligible pre-tax and/or Roth salary contributions, subject to all IRS annual limits and plan limitations. Participants are 100% vested in employee salary contributions and Company matching contributions. 401(k) plan participants may elect to contribute up to 85% of their annual eligible compensation (either through pre-tax or Roth contributions), subject to annual IRS and plan limitations.

Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan

In addition to the 401(k) plan, U.S. employees with a salary band of 8 or higher (generally senior directors and above), including the NEOs other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, are eligible to participate in the Ingersoll Rand Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan (the “Supplemental Contribution Plan”), which is funded through a Rabbi Trust. This Supplemental Contribution Plan is intended to permit Company matching contributions on eligible participant compensation contributions to the Supplemental Contribution Plan in excess of the annual limitations imposed by the IRS on our ~~executive officers,~~tax-qualified 401(k) plan.

Eligible employees may contribute up to 85% of their salary and/or eligible annual bonus compensation to the ~~Compensation Committee adopted the 2018 LTI Program.~~Supplemental Contribution Plan. Under the ~~2018 LTI Program, our NEOs will receive~~Supplemental Contribution Plan, after an eligible employee exceeds the annual ~~equity awards, 50%~~IRS pre-tax/Roth contribution limits and the annual catch up contribution limit for participants age 50 and older or compensation limit under the 401(k) plan, we match 100% of ~~which will be in~~ the ~~form~~first 6% of ~~time-vesting~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

~~restricted stock units and 50% of which will be~~

participant’s further eligible contributions to the Supplemental Contribution Plan. Company matching contributions under the Supplemental Contribution Plan are contributed to the Rabbi Trust in the form of ~~time-vesting stock options. The time-vesting restricted stock units awards~~cash rather than our common stock. All employee and ~~the time-vesting options awards~~Company matching contributions under the ~~2018 LTI Program will vest~~Supplemental Contribution Plan are fully vested immediately.

Limited Perquisites

Executive perquisites are not part of our general compensation philosophy; however, we provide limited perquisites and personal benefits that are not generally available to all employees when necessary to attract top talent. For instance, beginning in ~~equal annual installments on~~2021, certain of our senior executives, including each of the ~~first four anniversaries~~NEOs, are eligible for a tax and financial planning benefit, under which participating executives are reimbursed up to $10,000 per year for qualified services and participation in our executive physical program.

In addition, from time to time, we may set forth additional perquisites in offer letters or employment agreements we enter into with our executive officers. These arrangements are discussed under “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of ~~the grant date, except that the awards granted~~Plan-Based Awards in ~~2018 will vest~~2021—Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements.” For example, in equal annual installments on each of the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. The Compensation Committee determined that, in 2018, awards under the 2018 LTI Program would be made to our NEOs in the following amounts: Mr. Reynal — $4,000,000; Mr. Herndon — $1,000,000; Mr. Schiesl — $675,000; Mr. Snyder — $400,000;2021, per his employment agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras ~~— $500,000. These grant amounts were translated~~was entitled to international school assistance and use of a company car.

Severance and Change in Control Agreements

The Company believes that reasonable and appropriate severance and change in control benefits are necessary in order to be competitive in the Company’s executive attraction and retention efforts. As discussed below, the offer letters we enter into with our NEOs provide for certain payments, rights and benefits to the NEOs upon an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a ~~number of stock options and restricted stock units by taking such dollar amount and dividing it~~termination by the ~~per share or per option “fair value” that will be used~~NEO for ~~reporting the compensation expense associated with the grant under applicable accounting guidance, which “fair value” will be based~~“good reason” (as such terms are defined in ~~part on the per share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.~~

~~Executive Severance Benefits – Mr. Snyder and Mr. Miñarro Viseras~~

In February 2018, in connection with our annual review of our executive compensation, we approved an increase to the benefits to which Messrs. Snyder and Miñarro Viseras are entitled in the event of certain qualifying terminations to align them with the severance benefits to which our other senior executive officers are entitled.

~~Under the terms approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2018, if the Company terminates Mr. Snyder’s employment without Cause (as that term is defined below under~~ “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers ~~upon~~Upon Termination of Employment or Change in ~~Control—Severance~~Control-Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants”~~) or if Mr. Snyder terminates his~~ below). In addition, our equity award agreements provide for accelerated vesting upon a change in control in certain circumstances and upon certain qualifying terminations of employment, as more fully described above under “―Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021―Terms of Equity Awards.”

Risk Management and Mitigation of Compensation Policies and Practices

The Committee has reviewed our incentive compensation programs, discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program, considered various mitigating factors, and reviewed these items with ~~us for Good Reason (as that term is defined below under “Potential Payments~~its independent consultant, Pearl Meyer. In addition, our Committee asked Pearl Meyer to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control—Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants”), subject to Mr. Snyder’s continued compliance with the restrictive covenants in his management equity agreements and his execution of a customary waiver and release agreement, he will be entitled to receive:

~~Continued payment over a 12-month period (the “Severance Period”) of his annual base salary earned in respect~~conduct an independent risk assessment of our ~~fiscal year preceding~~executive and other compensation programs. Based on these reviews and discussions, the ~~fiscal year~~Committee does not believe our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.

For the foregoing reasons, the Committee has concluded that the programs by which our executives are compensated strike an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term compensation and incentivize our executives to act in ~~which~~a manner that prudently manages enterprise risk.

Employment Agreements

We entered into offer letters setting forth initial compensation and benefits, as well as severance terms, with Messrs. Reynal, Schiesl and Weatherred at the ~~termination date occurs, payable in substantially equal monthly installments over the Severance Period; and~~

~~Continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees~~time of ~~the Company), subject to his electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for 12 months following the date his~~their initial employment. In addition, we entered into an employment ~~terminates (or, if earlier, through the date that he becomes employed by another employer and eligible for health insurance coverage at such employer).~~

The Compensation Committee also approved in February 2018 a mutual twelve-month advance notice period for a termination of Mr. Miñarro Viseras's employment not for cause or without good reason, during whichagreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras ~~may be released from his work duties but will still be entitled~~when he joined the Company in 2016, and we entered into a new employment agreement with him in October 2018 in connection with our competitive review of executive officer compensation. Full descriptions of the material terms of the employment agreements we entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras and the offer letters we entered into with Messrs. Reynal, Schiesl, and Weatherred are presented below in “―Narrative Disclosure to ~~remuneration.~~

Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation of our NEOs for services rendered to us during the years indicated.

Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)⁽¹⁾
Bonus
($)⁽²⁾
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)⁽³⁾
All Other
Compensation
($)⁽⁴⁾
Total
($)
Vicente Reynal, Chief Executive Officer

2017

765,754

225,000

—

1,103,760

285,581

2,380,095

2016

750,000

—

4,568,331

877,500

233,614

6,429,445

Philip T. Herndon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

2017

406,750

125,000

—

588,960

11,258

1,131,968

2016

347,917

—

3,257,821

446,262

7,897

4,059,972

Andrew Schiesl, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary

2017

457,500

100,000

—

489,900

75,872

1,123,272

2016

450,000

—

610,717

367,875

49,565

1,478,082

Neil Snyder, Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Planning

2017

351,000

75,000

—

254,160

123,941

804,101

Enrique Miñarro Viseras, Vice President and General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA⁽⁶⁾

2017

316,000

—

—

205,222

229,222

750,444

2016

195,943

532,517

691,114

113,015

155,548

1,684,817

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)⁽¹⁾	Bonus ($)⁽²⁾	Stock Awards ($)⁽³⁾	Option Awards ($)⁽³⁾	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)⁽⁴⁾	All Other Compensation ($)⁽⁵⁾	Total ($)
Vicente Reynal, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	2021	1,000,000	―	5,024,967	1,674,995	2,730,000	183,524	10,613,486
	2020	861,358	843,150	6,699,947	1,674,996	1,500,000	561,723	12,141,175
	2019	823,988	―	2,175,009	2,175,003	269,808	91,703	5,535,511

Vikram Kini, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	2021	487,500	122,455	824,952	274,995	773,500	119,806	2,603,208
Vikram Kini, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer	2020	340,562	247,455	849,930	249,994	286,475	46,886	2,021,301

Andrew Schiesl, SVP, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary	2021	500,000	―	712,461	237,486	682,500	63,103	2,195,550
	2020	437,083	375,000	949,973	237,493	375,000	1,026,939	3,401,488
	2019	460,000	―	362,497	362,497	110,400	40,921	1,336,315

Enrique Miñarro Viseras, SVP & GM, Industrial Technologies and Services, EMEIA and Pressure and Vacuum Solutions Group⁽⁶⁾	2021	481,304	―	824,952	274,995	538,123	78,026	2,197,401
	2020	396,782	388,430	999,995	249,998	393,863	89,626	2,518,695
	2019	369,803	―	249,996	250,004	237,163	234,140	1,341,105

Michael Weatherred, SVP, IR Execution Excellence (IRX), Strategy & Business Development	2021	415,000	―	524,945	174,989	566,475	39,811	1,721,220
	2020	357,796	311,000	699,975	174,999	311,250	86,799	1,941,818

(1)

Reflects the salary amounts earned by our NEOs in the years indicated. In light of the uncertainty of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic at the time, each of our NEOs’ base salaries were reduced by 15% from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. The details of changes in unadjusted salary rates from 2020 to 2021 is provided under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Base Salary”.

(2)

~~Reflects special, one-time IPO bonus amounts.~~

~~(3)~~

Amounts shown for 2020 reflect one-time bonuses made in recognition of extraordinary efforts related to the merger and integration as discussed in last year’s proxy statement. In addition, with respect to Mr. Kini, the amount shown for 2021 reflects the portion of a retention and relocation bonus earned in 2021 that was awarded to him in 2019 to encourage him to relocate to the Charlotte area after the Merger.

(3)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), using the assumptions discussed in Note 16: “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

(4)	Amounts shown for 2021 reflect amounts earned under our ~~2017~~2021 MIP.

~~(4)~~(5)

Amounts reported under All Other Compensation for 2021 reflect the following:

Name	Matching Contributions ($)(a)	Relocation Services ($)	Tax Gross-Up / Equalization Payments ($)(b)	Company Paid Life Insurance Premiums ($)	Tax Preparation and Financial Planning Services ($)	Other ($)(c)	Total Other Compensation ($)
Vicente Reynal	150,006	―	―	1,193	32,325	―	183,524
Vikram Kini	43,945	51,599	23,725	537	―	―	119,806
Andrew Schiesl	52,506	―	―	597	10,000	―	63,103
Enrique Miñarro Viseras	―	―	18,208	1,103	18,381	40,333	78,026
Michael Weatherred	29,316	―	―	495	10,000	―	39,811

(a)	~~(a)~~Reflects Company matching contributions in the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan and the non-tax-qualified Supplemental Contribution Plan.

(b)

~~as to~~For Mr. Reynal, reimbursement for tax preparation expenses, Company-paid life insurance premiums ($1,827), Company 401(k) match ($6,367) and Company Excess Contribution Plan match ($161,300). Mr. Reynal also receivedKini, reflects a tax equalization payment with respect to ~~his cash compensation earned during his service in Europe in 2016 ($83,871).~~

~~(b)~~

~~as to~~relocation payments. For Mr. ~~Herndon, company-paid life insurance premiums ($792) and Company 401(k) match ($10,467).~~

~~(c)~~

~~as to Mr. Schiesl, company-paid life insurance premiums ($792), Company 401(k) match ($15,429, plus a contribution of $2,571 to a Roth IRA) and Company Excess Contribution Plan match ($57,081).~~

~~(d)~~

~~as to Mr. Snyder, company-paid life insurance premiums ($792), Company 401(k) match ($16,200), a housing allowance ($53,903) and~~Miñarro Viseras, value reflects a tax gross-up relating to ~~his housing allowance ($53,047).~~reimbursement of school fees.

(c)

~~(e)~~

~~as to Mr. Miñarro Viseras,~~Reflects actual Company expenditures for use, including business use, of a Company car, including expenditures for the car lease and gas, ~~($25,748), a housing allowance ($43,202),~~and reimbursement of school fees for Mr. Miñarro ~~Viseras’s children ($63,675), a tax gross-up relating to his housing allowance ($39,044) and a tax gross-up relating to our reimbursement of school fees ($57,553).~~Viseras' children.

~~(5)~~(6)

Mr. Miñarro Viseras is based in Europe and compensated in Euros. We converted his ~~2017~~2021 cash compensation, his amounts earned under our ~~2017~~2021 MIP, and amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for him to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of ~~1.20048,~~1.1357, which was the ~~end~~5-year average exchange rate as of ~~month translation rate,~~ December ~~2017.~~31, 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in ~~2017~~

Estimated Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾
Name
Threshold ($)
Target ($)
Maximum ($)
Vicente Reynal

8,083

766,500

1,533,000

Philip T. Herndon

4,313

409,000

818,000

Andrew Schiesl

10,914

345,000

690,000

Neil Snyder

3,722

176,500

353,000

Enrique Miñarro Viseras

57,006

152,016

304,032

2021

			Estimated Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽²⁾			All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units⁽³⁾ (#)	All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options⁽⁴⁾ (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)⁽⁵⁾
Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)			Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($)	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)⁽⁵⁾
Vicente Reynal			$187,500	$1,500,000	$3,000,000
	2/23/21	2/18/21				36,749	73,497	146,994				3,349,993
	2/23/21	2/18/21							36,748			1,674,974
	2/23/21	2/18/21								93,107	$45.58	1,674,995
Vikram Kini			$53,125	$425,000	$850,000
	2/23/21	2/18/21				6,033	12,066	24,132				549,968
	2/23/21	2/18/21							6,033			274,984
	2/23/21	2/18/21								15,286	$45.58	274,995
Andrew Schiesl			$46,875	$375,000	$750,000
	2/23/21	2/18/21				5,211	10,421	20,842				474,989
	2/23/21	2/18/21							5,210			237,472
	2/23/21	2/18/21								13,201	$45.58	237,486
Enrique Miñarro Viseras			$52,144	$417,150	$834,299
	2/23/21	2/18/21				6,033	12,066	24,132				549,968
	2/23/21	2/18/21							6,033			274,984
	2/23/21	2/18/21								15,286	$45.58	274,995
Michael Weatherred			$38,906	$311,250	$622,500
	2/23/21	2/18/21				3,839	7,678	15,356				349,963
	2/23/21	2/18/21							3,839			174,982
	2/23/21	2/18/21								9,727	$45.58	174,989

(1)

Reflects the possible payouts of cash incentive compensation under the ~~2017~~2021 MIP. The actual amounts earned are described in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” Mr. Miñarro Viseras is based in Europe and compensated in Euros. His Estimated Possible Non-Equity Incentive Plan Payout amounts were converted to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of ~~1.20048,~~1.1357, which was the ~~end~~5-year average exchange rate as of ~~month translation rate,~~ December ~~2017.~~31, 2020.

(2)

Reflects performance stock units granted under our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Actual earned award may range from 0% to 200% based on performance over a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2023. Vesting conditions and other key terms of these awards are discussed in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - 2021 Leadership and Compensation Developments.”

(3)

Reflects RSUs granted under our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Vesting conditions and other key terms of these awards are discussed in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - 2020 Leadership and Compensation Developments.”

(4)

Reflects stock options granted under our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Vesting conditions and other key terms of these awards are discussed in more detail above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2021 Executive Compensation Program in Detail - 2021 Leadership and Compensation Developments.”

(5)

Represents the grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, using the assumptions discussed in Note 16: “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. The stock options have an exercise price per share equal to the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported on the NYSE on the date of grant.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in ~~2017~~

2021

Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements

In general, the Company does not enter into employment agreements with employees, including our executive officers, however we do enter into offer letters with many of our executive officers. In addition, we did

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras ~~as well as an offer letter.~~in 2016 and a new employment agreement with him in October 2018. Descriptions of the offer letters we entered into with Messrs. Reynal, ~~Herndon,~~ Schiesl, and ~~Snyder~~Weatherred, and the employment agreement ~~and offer letter~~ we entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras are provided below. All current NEOs serve at the will of our ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors.~~directors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Offer Letter with Mr. Reynal

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Reynal, dated April 17, 2015, which was modified by a letter, dated November 19, 2015, we entered into with Mr. Reynal in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the offer letter, dated April 17, 2015, as so modified, the “Reynal Offer Letter”). The Reynal Offer Letter provides that, as of January 1, 2016, Mr. Reynal is entitled to receive a base salary of $750,000, which base salary was increased to ~~$766,500~~$1,000,000 in ~~April, 2017,~~March 2020, and that Mr. Reynal is entitled to participate in our annual MIP with a target award opportunity of 100% of his annual base ~~salary. The Reynal Offer Letter further provides that,~~salary, which target was increased to 150% of salary in 2016, Mr. Reynal’s MIP award would be based on the achievement of performance goals comparable to those that typically would be assigned to the Chief Executive Officer of the Industrials segment; however, following Mr. Reynal’s transition to devoting more of his business time and attention to the performance of duties as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his annual MIP award would transition to being based on the achievement of Company performance goals.

Mr. Reynal was eligible to receive two option grants under our Long-Term Incentive Program: one grant of 876,975 options upon commencement of his employment as the Chief Executive Officer of our Industrials segment, which he received in May 2015; and one grant of 585,403 options in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which he received in May 2016. March 2020.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Reynal Offer Letter, Mr. Reynal was expected to invest a minimum of $2,000,000, and was given the opportunity to invest significantly more, into our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements.

During the time Mr. Reynal was based in Munich, Germany (the “Expat Period”), the Reynal Offer Letter provides that he was entitled to certain expatriate benefits, including an annual cost of living adjustment of $26,000, a monthly housing allowance of $5,533, payment or reimbursement of tuition to an international school for his dependent children, payment or reimbursement of school-sponsored transportation for his dependent children, reimbursement of expenses related to tax preparation performed by a tax preparation firm, use of a company car, reimbursement for expenses in connection with storage of household goods in the United States and reimbursement for business class travel to the United States or a comparable location for Mr. Reynal and his immediate family once per year. Mr. Reynal was also entitled to tax equalization on his cash compensation and expatriate benefits during the Expat Period; provided that the annual cost to the Company of such tax equalization shall not exceed $275,000.

Mr. Reynal is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), ~~Excess~~Supplemental Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along with a comprehensive wellness program.

The Reynal Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”

~~Offer Letter with Mr. Herndon~~

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Herndon, dated November 18, 2015, which was modified by an offer letter, dated September 2, 2016, we entered into with Mr. Herndon in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer of the Company (the offer letter, dated November 18, 2015, as so modified, the “Herndon Offer Letter”). The Herndon Offer Letter provides that Mr. Herndon is entitled to receive a base salary of $400,000, which base salary was increased to $409,000 in April, 2017, and is eligible to participate in the annual MIP with a target award opportunity of 100% of his base salary.

Mr. Herndon was eligible to receive a grant of 468,323 options under our Long-Term Incentive Program, which he received in May 2016. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Herndon Offer Letter, Mr. Herndon was expected to invest a minimum of $1,000,000, and was given the opportunity to invest significantly more, into our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements, no later than two months following the date his employment with us commenced.

~~Mr. Herndon is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), Excess Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along with a comprehensive wellness program.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~The Herndon Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”~~

Offer Letter with Mr. Schiesl

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. Schiesl, dated November 25, 2013 (the “Schiesl Offer Letter”). The Schiesl Offer Letter provides that Mr. Schiesl is entitled to receive a base salary of $450,000, which base salary was increased to ~~$460,000~~$500,000 in ~~April, 2017,~~March 2020, and is eligible to participate in the annual MIP with a target award opportunity of 75% of his base salary.

Mr. Schiesl was eligible to receive (i) a grant of 394,474 options under our Long-Term Incentive Program, which he received in March 2014, and (ii) a grant of 36,739 options (the “Investment Options”) which he received in lieu of a sign-on bonus in March 2014 and which vested on June 16, 2014.

Mr. Schiesl is also eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k), ~~Excess~~Supplemental Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along with a comprehensive wellness program.

The Schiesl Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”

Employment Agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras

The employment agreement the Company entered into with Mr. Miñarro Viseras on October 22, 2018 (the “Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement”) provided that Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to receive a base salary of €330,000, which base salary was increased to €432,125 in April 2021, was eligible to participate in the annual MIP with an award opportunity of up to 45% of his base salary, which target was increased to 85% of salary in March 2020, and was eligible to participate in our Management Equity Program.

Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, in 2021, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was entitled to use of a company car and up to €53,061 per year of international school assistance for his children through the 2021 spring semester.

Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was also covered under the standard group accident insurance of the Company.

Offer Letter with Mr. ~~Snyder~~

Weatherred

The Company entered into an offer letter with Mr. ~~Snyder,~~Weatherred, dated ~~December 18, 2015(the “Snyder~~April 30, 2018 (the “Weatherred Offer Letter”)., in connection with his appointment as Vice President, Gardner Denver Operating System. The ~~Snyder~~Weatherred Offer Letter provides that Mr. ~~Snyder~~Weatherred is entitled to receive aan annual base salary of ~~$300,000,~~$345,000, which base salary was increased to ~~$353,000~~$415,000 in ~~April, 2017,~~March 2020, and ~~is eligible~~ to participate in the ~~annual MIP~~Company’s Management Incentive Plan with aan annual target award opportunity of ~~45%~~50% of his annual base salary, which target ~~award opportunity~~ was increased to ~~50%~~75% of salary in ~~November 2016.~~

March 2020.

Mr. ~~Snyder~~Weatherred was eligible to receive a grant of 263,430 options under our Long-Term Incentive Program, which he received in December 2016. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Snyder Offer Letter, Mr. Snyder was expected to invest a minimum of $90,000, and was given the opportunity to invest significantly more, into our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements, no later than two months following the date his employment with us commenced.

Under the Snyder Offer Letter, Mr. Snyder received a lump sum cash signing bonus of $300,000 in February 2016. Such bonus was subject to a repayment obligation upon certain terminations of Mr. Snyder’s employment.

Under the Snyder Offer Letter, Mr. Snyder is entitled to reimbursement for his reasonable commuting expenses (consistent with our travel policies) related to travel to and from his home, as well as a tax gross-up relating to such reimbursement.

~~Mr. Snyder is also~~ eligible to participate in the Company’s ~~401(k), Excess Contribution, medical, dental, life insurance and disability plans, along~~long-term incentive plan with a ~~comprehensive wellness program.~~

target annual equity grant opportunity equal to $275,000, which target annual equity grant opportunity was increased to $700,000 in March 2020.

The ~~Snyder~~Weatherred Offer Letter also contains severance arrangements, which are discussed below under “Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year End

	Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Exercisable⁽¹⁾	Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Unexercisable⁽²⁾	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)⁽³⁾	Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested (#)⁽⁴⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)⁽⁴⁾
Vicente Reynal	5/24/15	438,486	―	$10.61	5/24/25
	5/24/15	258,488	―	$10.61	5/24/25
	5/10/16	292,702	―	$10.61	5/10/26
	5/10/16	292,701	―	$10.61	5/10/26
	2/22/18	71,174	71,175	$32.06	2/22/28	31,192	1,929,849
	2/21/19	110,070	110,072	$27.05	2/21/29	40,204	2,487,421
	3/6/20	42,729	128,189	$27.79	3/6/30	45,205	2,796,833		241,092⁽⁵⁾	14,916,362
	3/6/20					30,137	1,864,576
	2/23/21	―	93,107	$45.58	2/23/31	36,748	2,273,599		146,994⁽⁶⁾	9,094,519
Vikram Kini	3/19/14	84,576	―	$8.16	3/19/24
	3/19/14	84,577	―	$8.16	3/19/24			��
	12/9/16	7,066	―	$11.43	12/9/26
	12/9/16	7,066	―	$11.43	12/9/26
	2/22/18	7,117	7,118	$32.06	2/22/28	3,120	193,034
	2/21/19	10,121	10,122	$27.05	2/21/29	3,698	228,795
	3/6/20	3,821	11,465	$27.79	3/6/30	2,699	166,987		14,392⁽⁵⁾	890,433
	3/6/20					1,799	111,304
	6/30/20	3,330	9,991	$28.12	6/30/30	4,001	247,542		21,336⁽⁵⁾	1,320,058
	2/23/21	―	15,286	$45.58	2/23/31	6,033	373,262		24,132⁽⁶⁾	1,493,047
Andrew Schiesl	2/22/18	12,010	12,011	$32.06	2/22/28	5,264	325,684
	2/21/19	18,344	18,346	$27.05	2/21/29	6,701	414,591
	3/6/20	6,058	18,176	$27.79	3/6/30	6,410	396,587		34,184⁽⁵⁾	2,114,964
	3/6/20					4,273	264,371
	2/23/21	―	13,201	$45.58	2/23/31	5,210	322,343		20,842⁽⁶⁾	1,289,495
Enrique Miñarro Viseras	5/10/16	13,607	―	$10.61	5/10/26
	5/10/16	68,037	―	$10.61	5/10/26
	2/22/18	8,896	8,898	$32.06	2/22/28	3,900	241,293
	9/11/18	16,770	5,591	$26.18	9/11/28	2,388	147,746
	2/21/19	12,652	12,652	$27.05	2/21/29	4,622	285,963
	3/6/20	6,377	19,133	$27.79	3/6/30	6,747	417,437		35,984⁽⁵⁾	2,226,330
	3/6/20					4,498	278,291
	2/23/21	―	15,286	$45.58	2/23/31	6,033	373,262		24,132⁽⁶⁾	1,493,047
Michael Weatherred	5/14/18	7,350	2,450	$33.46	5/14/28	1,028	63,602
	2/21/19	8,856	8,857	$27.05	2/21/29	3,236	200,211
	3/6/20	4,464	13,393	$27.79	3/6/30	4,723	292,212		25,188⁽⁵⁾	1,558,382
	3/6/20					3,149	194,829
	2/23/21	―	9,727	$45.58	2/23/31	3,839	237,519		15,356⁽⁶⁾	950,076

(1)	Reflects vested and exercisable Time Options and Performance Options granted pursuant to our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

(2)

Reflects unvested stock options granted prior to our initial public offering pursuant to our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan and unvested stock options granted from 2018 through 2020 pursuant to our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Stock options granted to our NEOs on February 22, 2018 vest in equal installments on the second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. All other unvested stock options granted to our NEOs vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.

(3)

Reflects unvested RSUs and PSUs granted pursuant to our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. RSUs granted to our NEOs on February 22, 2018 vest in equal installments on the second, third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. For NEOs with two rows of March 6, 2020 grants, the second grant of RSUs vests in equal installments on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date. All other RSUs granted to our NEOs vest in equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date.

(4)	Values determined based on the December 31, 2021 closing price of the Company's common stock on the NYSE of $61.87.

(5)

Reflects PSUs that will vest, if at all, based on the Company’s achievement of the Relative TSR performance measure over the performance period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the achievement level with respect to Relative TSR was between target and maximum. Accordingly, the number of PSUs reported in the table reflects the amount that would be earned for maximum performance. The actual number of shares that will vest with respect to the PSUs is not yet determinable.

(6)

Reflects PSUs that will vest, if at all, based on the Company’s achievement of the Relative TSR performance measure over the performance period beginning on January 1, 2021 and ending on December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2021, the achievement level with respect to Relative TSR was between target and maximum. Accordingly, the number of PSUs reported in the table reflects the amount that would be earned for maximum performance. The actual number of shares that will vest with respect to the PSUs is not yet determinable.

~~Employment Agreement~~TABLE OF CONTENTS

Option Exercises and ~~Offer Letter~~Stock Vested in 2021

The following table provides information regarding Options exercises and RSUs vested during fiscal 2021 for our NEOs.

Option Awards

Stock Awards
Name

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)

Value Realized
on Exercise
($)⁽¹⁾

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)⁽²⁾
Vicente Reynal

60,000

2,483,400

80,902

3,802,060
Vikram Kini

―

―

7,440

348,022
Andrew Schiesl

―

―

12,391

579,416
Enrique Miñarro Viseras

―

―

13,394

651,287
Michael Weatherred

―

―

7,367

354,556
(1)
Value realized on exercise is based on the gain, if any, equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock acquired upon exercise on the exercise date less the exercise price, multiplied by the number of options exercised.
(2)
The value realized on vesting is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the vesting date. If vesting occurs on a day on which the NYSE is closed, the value realized on vesting is based on the closing price on the last trading day prior to the vesting date.
Pension Benefits - Fiscal 2021
During 2021, no NEOs participated in either a tax-qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plan sponsored by the Company.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation - Fiscal 2021
Name

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)⁽¹⁾

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)⁽²⁾

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)⁽³⁾

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)

Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)⁽⁴⁾
Vicente Reynal

55,006

132,606

528,792

―

3,889,841
Vikram Kini

260,265

26,545

162,399

―

1,461,144
Andrew Schiesl

68,456

35,106

64,992

―

825,774
Enrique Miñarro Viseras

―

―

―

―

―
Michael Weatherred

―

11,916

23,200

―

144,971
(1)
The amounts in this column are reported as compensation for fiscal 2021 in the “Base Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)
Represents the amount of the matching contribution made by us in accordance with our Supplemental Contribution Plan. Matching contributions are reported for the year in which the compensation against which the applicable deferral election is applied has been earned (regardless of whether such matching contribution is actually credited to the NEO's non-qualified deferred compensation account in that year or the following year). The amounts in this column are reported as compensation for fiscal 2021 in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)
Amounts in this column are not reported as compensation for fiscal 2021 in the Summary Compensation Table since they do not reflect above-market or preferential earnings.
(4)
The amounts reported in this column include the following aggregate amounts for each of the following NEOs reported as compensation to such named executive officers for previous years in the “Base Salary,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “All Other Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table: Mr. Reynal, $841,500 in fiscal 2016, $1,049,316 in fiscal 2017, $573,416 in fiscal 2018, $83,485 in fiscal 2019 and $361,310 in fiscal 2020; Mr. Kini, $207,607 in fiscal 2020; Mr. Schiesl, $65,536 in 2016, $114,162 in fiscal 2017, $50,766 in fiscal 2018, $46,000 in fiscal 2019 and $98,998 in fiscal 2020; and Mr. Weatherred, $20,994 in fiscal 2019 and $65,422 in fiscal 2020.
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

In addition to the 401(k) plan, U.S. employees with ~~Mr. Miñarro Viseras~~

~~The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras, dated April 29, 2016~~a salary band 8 or higher (generally senior director and commencing on May 10, 2016 (the “Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement”). The Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Miñarro Viseras is entitled to receive a base salary of $330,013, which base salary was increased to $337,814 in April, 2017 (in each case, converted from Euros to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of 1.20048, which was the end of monthy translation rate, December 2017), isabove) are eligible to participate in the Supplemental Contribution Plan. The participant selects the deferral percentage for the Supplemental Contribution Plan at the time of initial enrollment in the Supplemental Contribution Plan or once per year in December for the following year. In December of each year, a participant

TABLE OF CONTENTS

may make a separate election to defer from the annual MIP award earned the following year and payable in the year thereafter. The Company matches each participant’s contributions to the Supplemental Contribution Plan with ~~an award opportunity~~Company matching contributions. The Company match consists of up$1 for each $1 the participant defers under the Supplemental Contribution Plan (up to ~~45%~~the first 6% of ~~his base~~a participant’s annual eligible compensation), less any matching contribution made to the 401(k) plan. The Company match is credited to the Supplemental Contribution Plan in the form of cash.

With respect to employee and Company matching contributions made to the Supplemental Contribution Plan on and after January 1, 2021, participants may elect to receive distributions related to each calendar year in a lump sum or 5-, 10-, or 15-year installments payable (i) when the participant separates from service with the Company or (ii) on a specific in-service date designated by the participant. For amounts deferred between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020, participants may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or 5-, or 10-year installments payable (i) when the participant separates from service with the Company or (ii) on a specific in-service date designated by the participant. A participant makes these distribution elections for the specific year’s contributions at the time the participant makes the salary and MIP deferral elections in December for the following year. For amounts deferred before January 1, 2019, participants in the Supplemental Contribution Plan may elect to receive distributions of their plan account in either a lump sum or 5- or 10-year installments payable when the participant separates from service with the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the Supplemental Contribution Plan. Loans are not permitted under the Supplemental Contribution Plan.

The investment options available to participants, including the NEOs, under the Supplemental Contribution Plan are similar to those offered to all of the participants in the 401(k) plan. Because some specific investment options available under the 401(k) plan are not available under the Supplemental Contribution Plan, the Company has made similar investment options available to the Supplemental Contribution Plan participants. Our stock is ~~eligible~~not a permitted investment option under the Supplemental Contribution Plan.

Potential Payments to ~~participate~~Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits that would have been payable to our ~~Management Equity Program.~~

~~Under~~NEOs under existing plans and arrangements assuming a qualifying termination if a termination or change in control occurred on December 31, 2021, the ~~Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement,~~ last business day of our 2021 fiscal year. A description of the provisions governing such payments under our agreements and any material conditions or obligations applicable to the receipt of payments is described below under “Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants.”

The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided generally to all salaried employees upon termination of employment and do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the NEOs. These include accrued but unpaid salary and distributions of plan balances under our 401(k) savings plan.

Name	Cash Severance Payment ($)⁽¹⁾	Continuation of Group Health Coverage ($)⁽²⁾	Accrued but Unused Vacation ($)⁽³⁾	Value of Stock Awards and Stock Option Acceleration ($)⁽⁴⁾	Total ($)
Vicente Reynal
Qualifying Termination	1,000,000	23,423	―	10,386,441	11,409,863
Change in Control (“CIC”)	―	―	―	22,419,337	22,419,337
Qualifying Termination and CIC	1,000,000	23,423	―	43,337,845	44,361,268
Vikram Kini
Qualifying Termination	500,000	23,423	―	1,140,782	1,664,204
Change in Control (“CIC”)	―	―	―	1,979,469	1,979,469
Qualifying Termination and CIC	500,000	23,423	―	4,450,713	4,974,136
Andrew Schiesl
Qualifying Termination	500,000	23,423	―	1,605,812	2,129,235
Change in Control (“CIC”)	―	―	―	3,178,819	3,178,819
Qualifying Termination and CIC	500,000	23,423	―	6,410,380	6,933,803
Enrique Miñarro Viseras
Qualifying Termination	490,764	―	―	1,754,122	2,244,886
Change in Control (“CIC”)	―	―	―	3,458,100	3,458,100
Qualifying Termination and CIC	490,764	―	―	7,008,488	7,499,252

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name	Cash Severance Payment ($)⁽¹⁾	Continuation of Group Health Coverage ($)⁽²⁾	Accrued but Unused Vacation ($)⁽³⁾	Value of Stock Awards and Stock Option Acceleration ($)⁽⁴⁾	Total ($)
Michael Weatherred
Qualifying Termination	415,000	23,423	―	930,775	1,369,197
Change in Control (“CIC”)	―	―	―	2,342,213	2,342,213
Qualifying Termination and CIC	415,000	23,423	―	3,746,124	4,184,546

(1)	Cash severance payment includes the following:

Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and Weatherred - continued payment in substantially equal monthly installments over a 12-month period of their respective annual base salaries.

Mr. Miñarro Viseras ~~received~~- twelve months' notice in the event of his termination, with the option to terminate him immediately with a lump sum ~~cash signing bonus~~payment of ~~$470,263 (which amount was paid to Mr. Miñarro Viseras in Euros and has been~~twelve months' salary (for the purposes of this table, salary converted to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of ~~1.1065, which is the average monthly translation rate for 2016) in August 2016. Such bonus was subject to a repayment obligation upon certain terminations of Mr. Miñarro Viseras’s employment.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras is eligible for relocation benefits, use of a company car, and international school assistance for his children in the amount of $54,002 (converted from Euros to U.S. dollars at an exchange rate of 1.20048,1.1357, which was the ~~end of month translation rate, December 2017) for the first year of his employment and for $42,039 (converted from Euros to U.S. dollars at an~~5-year average exchange rate as of ~~1.20048, which was the end of month translation rate,~~ December 2017) for each year thereafter. Such relocation benefits are subject to a repayment obligation if Mr. Miñarro Viseras is terminated within 24 months by the Company for cause or by Mr. Miñarro Viseras without good reason.

~~Under the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement, Mr. Miñarro Viseras is also covered under the standard group accident insurance of the Company.~~

The Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement provides for a mutual three-month advance notice period for a termination of employment not for cause or without good reason, during which Mr. Miñarro Viseras may be released from his work duties but will still be entitled to remuneration.

31, 2020).

(2)

With respect to Messrs. Reynal, Kini, Schiesl, and Weatherred, reflects the cost of providing continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to the executive's electing to receive benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”), for a period of 12 months, assuming 2021 rates.

(3)	Amounts reported in this column reflect zero accrued but unused vacation days for each of our NEOs.

(4)

Unvested PSUs, RSUs and Options granted to our NEOs since 2018 vest and, in the case of options, become immediately exercisable upon a termination without “cause” (as defined below) within two years of a Change in Control. See “Treatment of Outstanding Equity Awards in the Event of Termination of Employment or Change in Control―Equity awards granted since 2018-2020” below.

Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants

Under the terms of Messrs. Reynal’s, Schiesl’s and Weatherred’s offer letters, and the ~~Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement,~~severance terms applicable to Mr. ~~Miñarro Viseras is~~Kini, if the Company terminates their employment without “cause” or any of them terminates their employment for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement or severance terms), subject to certain ~~restrictive covenants, including~~conditions and on-going commitments, they will be entitled to receive:

Continued payment over a ~~perpetual confidentiality covenant, violation~~12-month period (the “Severance Period”) of ~~which will constitute “cause” under such agreement,~~their then-current annual base salary, payable in substantially equal monthly installments over the Severance Period; and ~~a noncompetition covenant for~~

Continued group health coverage (on the ~~duration~~same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to the NEO’s electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for 12 months following the date his employment ~~relationship. Mr. Miñarro Viseras may be required to pay certain contractual penalties~~terminates (or, if earlier, through the date the NEO becomes employed by another employer and eligible for ~~each breach of either restrictive covenant.~~

~~We also entered into an offer letter~~health insurance coverage at such employer).

Under our agreement with Mr. Miñarro Viseras, ~~dated March 16, 2016 (the “Miñarro Viseras Offer Letter”). The terms~~we are required to provide him 12 months’ notice in the event of the Miñarro Viseras Offer Letter are generally identical to those of the Miñarro Viseras Employment Agreement except that it does not contain any restrictive covenants, nor does it provide for a mutual three-month advance notice period for ahis termination, of employment not for cause or without good reason. In addition, the Miñarro Viseras Offer Letter provided that Mr. Miñarro Viseras was eligible to receive a grant of 136,074 stock options under our Long-Term Incentive Plan, which he received in May 2016. The Miñarro Viseras Offer Letter also provided that Mr. Miñarro Viseras was expected to invest a minimum of $60,000, and he was given the opportunity to invest significantly more, into our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements.

~~Terms of Equity Awards~~

~~Long-Term Incentive Plan Grants~~

~~Time Option Vesting Schedule~~. We granted Time Options in May 2016 to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon, Snyder and Miñarro Viseras and in December 2016 to Messrs. Herndon and Snyder. The Time Options granted to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Snyder in May 2016 vest and become exercisable over time with respect to 33.3% of such Time Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Time Options granted in May 2016 to Mr. Miñarro Viseras and December 2016 to Messrs. Herndon and Snyder vest and become exercisable over time with respect to 20% or such Time Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

In addition, we granted Time Options to Mr. Schiesl in 2014, and to Mr. Reynal in 2015. The Time Options granted to Mr. Schiesl in 2014 vest and become exercisable over time with respect to 20% of such Time Options on December 31st of each of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The Time Options granted to Mr. Reynal in 2015 vest and become exercisable over time with respect to 33.3% of such Time Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

~~Performance Option Vesting Schedule~~. We granted Performance Options in May 2016 to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon, Snyder and Miñarro Viseras and in December 2016 to Messrs. Herndon and Snyder. The Performance Options granted in May 2016 to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Snyder are eligible to vest and become exercisable with respect to up to 33.3% of such Performance Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018 and the Performance Options granted in May 2016 and December 2016 to Mr. Miñarro Viseras and Messrs. Herndon and Snyder, respectively, are eligible to vest and become exercisable with respect to up to 20% of such Performance Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date, if and only to the extent that the Company achieves the annual adjusted EBITDA performance targets set by the Compensation Committee, where “adjusted

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

EBITDA” refers to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization plus transaction, management and/or similar fees paid to KKR and/or its affiliates; provided that the Board may, following consultation with the ~~CEO, adjust the calculation~~option to terminate him immediately with a lump sum payment of adjusted EBITDA to reflect, to the extent not contemplated in the management plan, any extraordinary or one-time events, including, without limitation, acquisitions, divestitures, major capital investment programs, changes in accounting standards, stock expense related to the issuance12 months’ salary.

For more details of stock options, or other extraordinary or unusual events or occurrences, or any costs or expenses incurred during such period relating to environmental remediation, litigation or other disputes in respect of events and exposures that occurred prior to the end of the relevant fiscal year.

We also granted Performance Options to Mr. Schiesl in 2014, and to Mr. Reynal in 2015. The Performance Options granted to Mr. Schiesl in 2014 were eligible to vest and become exercisable with respect to up to 20% of such Performance Options on December 31st of each of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date, if and only to the extent that the Company achieves the annual adjusted EBITDA performance targets set by the Compensation Committee. The Performance Options granted to Mr. Reynal in 2015 were eligible to vest and become exercisable with respect to up to 33.3% of such Performance Options on December 31st of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date, if and only to the extent that the Company achieves the annual adjusted EBITDA performance targets set by the Compensation Committee.

The fiscal 2017 adjusted EBITDA performance target for purposes of determining vesting of Performance Options was $470 million and our actual adjusted EBITDA performance for fiscal 2017 was $561.5 million. Therefore, 33.3% of the Performance Options granted in May 2016 to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Snyder and to Mr. Reynal in 2015 and 20% of the Performance Options granted in May 2016 to Mr. Miñarro Viseras, in December 2016 to Messrs. Herndon and Snyder and to Mr. Schiesl in 2014 vested on December 31, 2017.

If the Company does not achieve the adjusted EBITDA performance target in 2018, but the Company’s adjusted EBITDA in respect of fiscal year 2018 equals or exceeds the adjusted EBITDA performance threshold set by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2018 then one-quarter (1/4) of the Performance Options granted in 2016 to our NEOs in other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras eligible to vest on December 31st of such year shall vest on December 31st of such year and with respect to the remaining three-quarters (3/4) of the Performance Options eligible to vest on December 31st of such year, one-half (1/2) of such Performance Options shall vest on December 31, 2019 if the Company’s adjusted EBITDA in respect of fiscal year 2019 equals or exceeds the adjusted EBITDA target set by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2019 and one-half (1/2) of such Performance Options shall vest on December 31, 2020 if the Company’s adjusted EBITDA in respect of fiscal year 2020 equals or exceeds the adjusted EBITDA target set by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2020.

At the end of the yearly measurement period with respect to any award of Performance Options, any then outstanding Performance Options that were not vested and exercisable in any previous year in accordance with their terms shall become vested and exercisable to the extent that the cumulative performance objectives have been satisfied in respect of the applicable performance period.

We believe that the adjusted EBITDA performance targets in all periods provide reasonably achievable, but challenging goals for our NEOs and other Long-Term Incentive Program participants and are intended to incentivize all participants to maximize their performance for the long-term benefit of our stockholders.

~~Effect of Change in Control on Vesting of Options~~. Notwithstanding the foregoing, immediately prior to any Change in Control (as defined below), any unvested portion of the Time Options shall vest and become immediately exercisable as to 100% of such Time Options. In addition, immediately prior to any Change in Control, the Performance Options shall vest and become immediately exercisable as to 100% of such Performance Options but only if, and to the extent that, as of such Change in Control, KKR achieves (x) a Sponsor IRR (as defined below) of 22.5% and (y) a Sponsor MOIC (as defined below) of 2.5x. No option will become exercisable as to any additional shares of the Company’s common stock following the termination of employment of an NEO for any reason and any option that is unexercisable as of the NEO’s termination of employment will immediately expire without payment.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

“Sponsor IRR” means, as of a Change in Control, the cumulative internal rate of return of KKR, excluding any fees paid to KKR or expenses reimbursed to KKR from time to time (“Sponsor Fees”), on KKR’s aggregate investment in the Company determined on a fully diluted basis, assuming inclusion of all shares of the Company’s common stock underlying all then outstanding Time Options and Performance Options.

“Sponsor MOIC” means, as of a Change in Control, the result obtained by dividing (i) the cash consideration received by KKR (other than any Sponsor Fees) as of the Change in Control by (ii) the aggregate amount of cash invested in (and the initial gross asset value of any property (other than money) contributed to) the Company by KKR, directly or indirectly, from time to time in respect of such investment.

A “Change in Control” means, (i) in one or a series of related transactions, the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to any person (or group of persons acting in concert), other than to (x) KKR or one or more of its controlled affiliates or (y) any employee benefit plan (or trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company or its controlled affiliates; or (ii) a merger, recapitalization, or other sale by the Company, KKR, or any of their respective affiliates, to a person (or group of persons acting in concert) of the Company’s common stock that results in more than 50% of the common stock of the Company (or any resulting company after a merger) being held by a person (or group of persons acting in concert) that does not include (x) KKR or its affiliates or (y) an employee benefit plan (or trust forming a part thereof) maintained by the Company or its controlled affiliates; and in any event of clause (i) or (ii), which results in KKR and its controlled affiliates or such employee benefit plan ceasing to hold the ability to elect a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors.

~~Expiration of Vested Options. Except as provided in the Management Stockholder’s Agreement described below under~~these agreements, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in ~~2017,~~2021―Summary of NEO Offer Letters and Employment Agreements.”

In addition to the payments described above, each of our NEOs is entitled to receive a distribution of all vested amounts under our Supplemental Contribution Plan. See “―Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal 2021.”

Treatment of Outstanding Equity Awards in the Event of Termination of Employment or Change in Control

The outstanding RSU and option awards we have granted to our NEOs provide for accelerated vesting in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment as described below and/or, in certain circumstances described below, in connection with a change in control.

Equity awards granted prior to our initial public offering

Effect of Change in Control on Expiration of Vested Options. As of December 31, 2021, all equity awards granted prior to our initial public offering have vested. Except as provided in the Management Stockholder’s Agreement described below under “Transactions with Related Persons—Arrangements with Our Executive Officers, Directors and Advisors—Management, Director and Advisor Stockholder’s Agreements,” all vested

TABLE OF CONTENTS

options will expire upon the earliest to occur of the following events: (1) the tenth anniversary of the date such options were granted, so long as the NEO remains employed with the Company through such date; (2) the first anniversary of the termination of the NEO’s employment with the Company because of death or Disability (as defined in the option award agreement); (3) one hundred eighty (180) days after the termination of the NEO’s employment with the Company without ~~Cause~~“cause” (as defined in the option award agreement) (except due to death or Disability) or the NEO’s resignation for ~~Good Reason~~“good reason” (as defined in the option award agreement); (4) the date the NEO’s employment is terminated by the Company for ~~Cause;~~“cause;” or (5) thirty (30) days after the NEO’s employment is terminated by the NEO without ~~Good Reason.~~“good reason.” In addition, at the discretion of the Company, options may be cancelled at the effective date of a merger, consolidation, or other transaction or capital change of the Company, in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, in exchange for a payment (payable in cash or other consideration depending on the terms of the transaction) per share equal to the excess, if any, of (x) the per share consideration paid to stockholders of the Company in the transaction over (y) the exercise price of the option.

~~General Provisions for~~

Equity awards granted 2018-2021

Effect of Qualifying Termination on Vesting of PSUs, RSUs, and Options ~~and Shares under the Management Stockholder’s Agreement~~

. In ~~connection with their initial equity awards, each of our NEOs became party to a Management Stockholder’s Agreement.~~

Under the Management Stockholder’s Agreement, shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our NEOs are generally nontransferable prior to the earlier of (i) a Change in Control or (ii) the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the applicable Management Stockholder’s Agreement.

Our NEOs have limited “piggyback” registration rights with respect to shares of our common stock, provided that in lieu of piggyback rights where such rights would otherwise be available, our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may elect to waive the transfer restrictions (other than any such restrictions contained in an underwriters’ lock-up or in connection with a public offering) on the number of shares of Common Stock that would have been subject to such piggyback rights

Pursuant to the terms of the Management Stockholder’s Agreement, the NEOs are subject to covenants not to (1) disclose confidential information, (2) solicit customers and certain employees, consultants and independent contractors of the Company, (3) compete with the Company and (4) disparage the Company.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year End~~

Option Awards
Name
Grant Date
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable⁽¹⁾
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable⁽²⁾
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)⁽³⁾
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Vicente Reynal
5/10/2015

438,487

109,622

10.61

5/10/2025

5/10/2015

219,244

109,622

10.61

5/10/2025

5/10/2016

195,135

97,568

10.61

5/10/2026

5/10/2016

195,134

97,567

10.61

5/10/2026
Philip T. Herndon
5/10/2016

156,108

78,054

10.61

5/10/2026

5/10/2016

156,108

78,054

10.61

5/10/2026

12/9/2016

28,261

42,392

11.43

12/9/2026

12/9/2016

28,261

42,392

11.43

12/9/2026
Andrew Schiesl
3/7/2014

157,789

39,447

8.16

3/7/2024

3/7/2014

157,789

39,447

8.16

3/7/2024

3/7/2014

36,739

—

8.16

3/7/2024
Neil Snyder
5/10/2016

87,810

43,905

10.61

5/10/2026

5/10/2016

87,810

43,905

10.61

5/10/2026

12/1/2016

9,420

14,131

11.43

12/1/2026

12/1/2016

9,421

14,131

11.43

12/1/2026
Enrique Miñarro Viseras
5/10/2016

27,215

40,823

10.61

5/10/2026

5/10/2016

27,214

40,822

10.61

5/10/2026

~~(1)~~

Reflects vested and exercisable Time Options, Performance Options and, in the case of Mr. Schiesl, Investment Options. 25% of the Time Options granted on 12/18/2013 and 3/7/2014 shown in this column vested on each of December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. 33.3% of the Time Options granted on 5/10/2015 shown in this column vested on each of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017. 50% of the Time Options granted on 5/10/2016, 12/9/2016 and 12/1/2017 shown in this column vested on each of December 31, 2016 and 2017. 25% of the Performance Options granted on 12/18/2013 and 3/7/2014 shown in this column vested on each of December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016. 50% of the Performance Options granted on 5/10/2016, 12/9/2016 and 12/1/2016 shown in this column vested on each of December 31, 2016 and 2017.

~~(2)~~

Reflects unvested Time Options. The unvested Time Options granted on each of December 18, 2013, March 7, 2014, May 10, 2015 and May 10, 2016 shown in this column (other than those granted to Mr. Miñarro Viseras on May 10, 2016) will vest and become exercisable on December 31, 2018, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such date. The unvested Time Options granted to Mr. Herndon on December 9, 2016, to Mr. Snyder on December 1, 2016 and to Mr. Miñarro Viseras on May 10, 2016 shown in this column will vest and become exercisable with respect to 33.3% of such Time Options on December 31st of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such date.

~~(3)~~

Reflects unvested Performance Options. As described in further detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis-Executive Compensation Program Elements-Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards,” the unvested Performance Options shown in this column will vest and become exercisable with respect to such Performance Options granted to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Snyder on May 10, 2016, to Mr. Schiesl on March 7, 2014 and to Mr. Reynal on March 10, 2015 on December 31, 2018, and with respect to 33.3% of such Performance Options granted to Mr. Herndon on December 9, 2016, Mr. Snyder on December 1, 2016 and Mr. Miñarro Viseras on May 10, 2016 on December 31st of each of 2018, 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such date and our achievement of the relevant adjusted EBITDA target, or in full upon a Change in Control if we have achieved the Sponsor IRR and Sponsor MOIC targets at such time. The Performance Options eligible to vest on December 31st of 2018 (other than those granted to Mr. Miñarro Viseras) will vest and become exercisable with respect to 1/4 of such Performance Options on such date, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such dates and our achievement of the relevant threshold adjusted EBITDA performance, and with respect to 3/8 of such Performance options on each of December 31st 2019 and 2020, subject to the NEO’s continued employment through such dates and our achievement of the relevant threshold adjusted EBITDA targets. At the end of the yearly measurement period with respect to any award of Performance Options, any then outstanding Performance Options that were not vested and exercisable in any previous year in accordance with their terms shall become vested and exercisable to the extent that the cumulative performance objectives have been satisfied in respect of the applicable performance period. We achieved the fiscal 2017 adjusted EBITDA target; accordingly the amounts reflected in the table reflect target performance.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017~~

~~During 2017, none of our NEOs exercised options or had any shares of stock or restricted stock or restricted stock units or similar instruments vest.~~

~~Pension Benefits - Fiscal 2017~~

~~During 2017, no NEOs participated in either a tax-qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plan sponsored by the Company.~~

~~Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation - Fiscal 2017~~

Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)⁽¹⁾
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)⁽²⁾
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)⁽³⁾
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE
($)⁽⁴⁾
Vicente Reynal

888,016

161,300

140,712

—

1,499,684

Philip T. Herndon

—

—

—

—

—

Andrew Schiesl

57,081

57,081

37,994

—

301,805

Neil Snyder

—

—

—

—

—

Enrique Miñarro Viseras

—

—

—

—

—

~~(1)~~

~~The amounts in this column are reported as compensation for fiscal 2017 in the “Base Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns of the Summary Compensation Table.~~

~~(2)~~

Represents the amount of the matching contribution made by us in accordance with our Excess Contribution Plan. Matching contributions are reported for the year in which the compensation against which the applicable deferral election is applied has been earned (regardless of whether such matching contribution is actually credited to the NEO’s non-qualified deferred compensation account in that year or the following year). The amounts in this column are reported as compensation for fiscal 2017 in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

~~(3)~~

~~Amounts in this column are not reported as compensation for fiscal 2017 in the Summary Compensation Table since they do not reflect above-market or preferential earnings.~~

~~(4)~~

Of the amounts reported in this column, $759,750 represents a portion of the compensation for 2016 reported in the “Base Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns and $81,750 represents a portion of the compensation for 2016 reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Reynal and $32,768 represents a portion of the compensation for 2016 reported in the “Base Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns and $32,768 represents a portion of the compensation for 2016 reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Schiesl.

~~Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan~~

In addition to the 401(k) plan, U.S. employees with a salary grade of 20 or higher (generally senior managers and above) are eligible to participate in the Excess Contribution Plan. Once a participant in the Excess Contribution Plan reaches the IRS annual limits for the 401(k) plan, contributions will be made to the Excess Contribution Plan based on the deferral percentage under the 401(k) plan. Such deferral percentage is selected at the time of enrollment in the Excess Contribution Plan or once per year in December for the following year. A separate election to defer from the annual MIP awards is made in December for the MIP award earned the following year and payable in the year thereafter. The Company matches each participant’s contributions with Company matching contributions. The Company match consists of $1 for each $1 contributed by a participant, up to the first 6% of a participant’s annual compensation. The Company match is credited in the form of cash.

Historically, the NEOs were also credited with a nonelective Company contribution of 12% of recognized compensation in excess of the IRS annual limit. The Company nonelective contributions were also contributed in cash and became fully vested after three years of employment. We discontinued the nonelective Company contributions in 2014.

Mr. Schiesl is fully vested in the nonelective Company contribution portion of the Excess Contribution Plan, and Messrs. Reynal and Herndon joined the Company after the nonelective contribution had been discontinued.

Participants in the Excess Contribution Plan may elect to receive distributions in either (x) a lump sum to be paid on the March 1 of the calendar year following the year of separation from the Company or (y) in a lump sum to be paid within 90 days after separation from service, subject to the terms and conditions of the Excess Contribution Plan. Loans and in-service withdrawals are not permitted under the Excess Contribution Plan.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

The investment options available to the named executive officers under the Excess Contribution Plan are virtually the same as those offered to all of the participants in the 401(k) plan. Because some investment options available under the 401(k) plan are not available for the nonqualified plan, the Company has made similar investment options available to the nonqualified plan participants. The table below shows the funds available under the Excess Contribution Plan and their annual rate of return for the calendar year ended December 31, 2017, as reported by the administrator of the 401(k) plan.

~~Name of Investment Fund~~	~~Ticker~~ ~~Symbol/Index~~ ~~Type~~	~~Annual~~ ~~Rate of~~ ~~Return %~~
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement Income R5~~	~~JSIIX~~		~~11.11~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2020 R5~~	~~JTTIX~~		~~13.96~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2025 R5~~	~~JNSIX~~		~~16.32~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2030 R5~~	~~JSMIX~~		~~18.99~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2035 R5~~	~~SRJIX~~		~~20.42~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2040 R5~~	~~SMTIX~~		~~21.83~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2045 R5~~	~~JSAIX~~		~~22.05~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 R5~~	~~JTSIX~~		~~22.08~~	%
~~JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2055 R5~~	~~JFFIX~~		~~22.01~~	%
~~American Funds EuroPacific Gr R6~~	~~RERGX~~		~~31.17~~	%
~~MFS International New Discovery R6~~	~~MIDLX~~		~~32.16~~	%
~~American Century Small Cap Value Inv~~	~~ASVIX~~		~~10.26~~	%
~~Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Instl~~	~~VSGIX~~		~~21.94~~	%
~~Artisan Mid Cap Institutional~~	~~APHMX~~		~~20.75~~	%
~~Dreyfus Mid Cap Index Fund~~	~~PESPX~~		~~15.68~~	%
~~American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6~~	~~RGAGX~~		~~26.53~~	%
~~Dodge & Cox Stock Fund~~	~~DODGX~~		~~18.33~~	%
~~JPMorgan Equity Index I~~	~~HLEIX~~		~~21.61~~	%
~~JPMorgan Core Bond R6~~	~~JCBUX~~		~~3.87~~	%
~~Vanguard Federal Money Market Inv~~	~~VMFXX~~		~~0.81~~	%

~~Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control~~

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits that would have been payable to our NEOs under existing plans and arrangements assuming a qualifying termination if a termination or change in control occurred on December 29, 2017, the last business day of our 2017 fiscal year. A description of the provisions governing such payments under our agreements and any material conditions or obligations applicable to the receipt of payments is described below under “Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants.”

Name
Cash
Severance
Payment
($)⁽¹⁾
Continuation
of Group
Health
Coverage
($)⁽²⁾
Accrued
but
Unused
Vacation
($)⁽³⁾
Value of Time
Option and
Performance
Option
Acceleration
($)⁽⁴⁾
Total
($)
Vicente Reynal

Qualifying Termination

1,644,000

20,052

—

—

1,664,052

Change in Control

—

—

—

9,663,318

9,663,318

Philip T. Herndon

Qualifying Termination

409,000

20,052

—

—

429,052

Change in Control

—

—

—

5,548,079

5,548,079

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

Name
Cash
Severance
Payment
($)⁽¹⁾
Continuation
of Group
Health
Coverage
($)⁽²⁾
Accrued
but
Unused
Vacation
($)⁽³⁾
Value of Time
Option and
Performance
Option
Acceleration
($)⁽⁴⁾
Total
($)
Andrew Schiesl

Qualifying Termination

827,875

20,052

—

—

847,927

Change in Control

—

—

—

2,033,098

2,033,098

Neil Snyder

Qualifying Termination

172,500

10,026

—

—

186,526

Change in Control

—

—

—

2,683,624

2,683,624

Enrique Miñarro Viseras

Qualifying Termination

—

—

—

—

—

Change in Control

—

—

—

1,903,961

1,903,961

~~(1)~~

~~Cash severance payment includes the following:~~

Mr. Reynal - continued payment in substantially equal monthly installments over a 12-month period of the sum of (x) his annual base salary and (y) his annual incentive award under the MIP earned in fiscal 2016.

~~Mr. Herndon - continued payment in substantially equal monthly installments over a 12-month period of his annual base salary.~~

Mr. Schiesl - continued payment in substantially equal monthly installments over a 12-month period of the sum of (x) his annual base salary and (y) his annual incentive award under the MIP earned in fiscal 2016.

~~Mr. Snyder - continued payment in substantially equal monthly installments over a 6-month period of the sum of his annual base salary earned in fiscal 2016.~~

~~(2)~~

With respect to Messrs. Reynal, Herndon and Schiesl, reflects the cost of providing continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to the executive’s electing to receive benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”), for a period of 12 months, assuming 2017 rates. With respect to Mr. Snyder, reflects the cost of providing continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to the executive’s electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for a period of 6 months, assuming 2017 rates.

~~(3)~~

~~Amounts reported in this column reflect zero accrued but unused vacation days for each of our NEOs.~~

~~(4)~~

Immediately prior to a Change in Control, all of our NEOs’ unvested Time Options would vest and become immediately exercisable. In addition, immediately prior to a Change in Control, all of our NEOs’ Performance Options would vest and become immediately exercisable but only if, and to the extent that, KKR achieves (x) a Sponsor IRR of 22.5% and (y) a Sponsor MOIC of 2.5. See “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards—Terms of Equity Awards.” The amount reported in the table assumes that our Sponsor achieves the required Sponsor IRR and Sponsor MOIC.

~~Severance Arrangements and Restrictive Covenants~~

We entered into offer letters with each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Miñarro Viseras, that contain severance terms. In 2017, Mr. Miñarro Viseras was not eligible for any severance pay and benefits not provided generally to all salaried employees upon termination of employment, however his employment agreement requires that we provide three months’ notice in the event of ~~his~~an NEO’s termination with the option to terminate him immediately with a lump sum payment of three months’ salary. As discussed above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Actions Taken in 2018,” in February 2018, we approved an increase to Mr. Miñarro Viseras’s termination benefits.

~~Messrs. Reynal and Schiesl~~

~~Under the terms of their offer letters, if the Company terminates either of Messrs. Reynal’s or Schiesl’s employment~~ without Cause (as defined below) or ~~either of Messrs. Reynal or Schiesl terminates his employment with us for Good Reason~~Approved Retirement (as defined below), ~~subject in Mr. Reynal’s case~~such NEO’s outstanding RSUs and options that would have vested on the first vesting date otherwise scheduled to ~~his continued compliance with~~occur immediately following the ~~restrictive covenants in his management equity agreements, in Mr. Schiesl’s case to certain provisions~~date of such termination without Cause or Approved Retirement will vest as of the date of such termination without Cause or Approved Retirement, as applicable. In the event of an NEO’s death or Disability (as defined in the ~~Severance Plan,~~2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan), such NEO’s outstanding RSUs and options that would have vested on the first and second vesting date otherwise scheduled to occur immediately following the date of such death or Disability shall vest as of the date of death or Disability. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company receives a legal opinion that there has been a legal judgment and/or legal development in ~~either case~~the NEO’s jurisdiction that would likely result in the favorable treatment that applies to the RSUs and options if the NEO’s ~~execution~~termination occurs as a result of NEO’s Approved Retirement being deemed unlawful and/or discriminatory, the Company may determine that the NEO’s Retirement (as defined below) is no longer an Approved Retirement.

In the event of an NEO’s termination without Cause, Approved Retirement or death or Disability occurring after the expiration of the Performance Period and before the vesting date, the PSUs that would have vested on the vesting date will vest on the vesting date.

Effect of a ~~customary waiver~~Change in Control on Vesting of PSUs, RSUs, and ~~release agreement, he~~Options. In the event of an NEO’s termination without Cause during the two-year period following a Change in Control (as defined in our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan), all of such NEO’s outstanding RSUs and options will immediately vest as of the date of such termination without Cause.

With respect to the PSUs, if a Change in Control occurs during the Performance Period, then the calculation of the number of PSUs that will vest is conducted as though (i) the last day of the Performance Period was the date of the Change in Control and (ii) the Company’s stock price at the end of the Performance Period was the price per share of the Company’s common stock payable in connection with such Change in Control. The number of PSUs resulting from such calculation will be ~~entitled to receive:~~

the number that will vest upon the consummation of such Change in Control.

~~Continued payment over a 12-month period (the “Severance Period”)~~For purposes of the ~~sum of (x) his annual base salary~~foregoing: “Approved Retirement,” “Cause,” “Detrimental Activity,” and ~~(y)~~“Retirement” have the ~~annual incentive award under~~definitions set forth in the ~~MIP, if any, earned in respect of our fiscal year preceding~~relevant grant agreement or the ~~fiscal year in which the termination date occurs, payable in substantially equal monthly installments over the Severance Period; and~~2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to the NEO’s electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for 12 months following the date his employment terminates (or, if earlier, through the date the NEO becomes employed by another employer and eligible for health insurance coverage at such employer).

~~Mr. Herndon~~

Under the terms of Mr. Herndon’s offer letter, if the Company terminates Mr. Herndon’s employment without Cause or if Mr. Herndon terminates his employment with us for Good Reason, subject to Mr. Herndon’s continued compliance with the restrictive covenants in his management equity agreements and his execution of a customary waiver and release agreement, he will be entitled to receive:

~~Continued payment over a 12-month period (the “Severance Period”) of his annual base salary, payable in substantially equal monthly installments over the Severance Period; and~~

Continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to his electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for 12 months following the date his employment terminates (or, if earlier, through the date that he becomes employed by another employer and eligible for health insurance coverage at such employer).

~~Mr. Snyder~~

Under the terms of Mr. Snyder’s offer letter, if the Company terminates Mr. Snyder’s employment without Cause or if Mr. Snyder terminates his employment with us for Good Reason, subject to Mr. Snyder’s continued compliance with the restrictive covenants in his management equity agreements and his execution of a customary waiver and release agreement, he will be entitled to receive:

Continued payment over a 6-month period (the “Severance Period”) of his annual base salary earned in respect of our fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the termination date occurs, payable in substantially equal monthly installments over the Severance Period; and

Continued group health coverage (on the same basis as actively employed employees of the Company), subject to his electing to receive benefits under COBRA, for 6 months following the date his employment terminates (or, if earlier, through the date that he becomes employed by another employer and eligible for health insurance coverage at such employer).

~~As described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Actions Taken in 2018,” in February 2018, we approved an increase to Mr. Snyder’s termination benefits.~~

In addition to the payments described above, each of our NEOs is entitled to receive a distribution of all vested amounts under our Excess Contribution Plan. See “—Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation — Fiscal 2017.”

~~For purposes of each of the severance arrangements described above:~~

“Cause” means the occurrence of any of the following with respect to an NEO: (1) a material breach by the NEO of the terms of the Company’s policies, the terms of which have previously been provided to such NEO; (2) any act of theft, misappropriation, embezzlement, fraud or similar conduct by the NEO involving the Company or any of its affiliates; (3) the NEO’s failure to act in accordance with any specific lawful instructions given to the NEO by the Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) in connection with the performance of the NEO’s duties for the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, which continues beyond ten (10) business days after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the NEO by the Company (the “Cure Period”); (4) any damage of a material nature to the business or property of the Company or any affiliate caused by NEO’s willful or grossly negligent conduct which continues beyond the Cure Period (to the extent that, in the Board of Directors’ reasonable judgment, such breach can be cured); (5) any intentional misconduct by the NEO which is reasonably likely to be materially damaging to the Company without a reasonable good faith belief by the NEO that such conduct was in the best interests of the Company; (6) the conviction or the plea of nolo contendere or the equivalent in respect of any felony or a misdemeanor involving an act of dishonesty, moral turpitude, deceit, or fraud by the NEO; or (7) a knowing and material breach of any written agreement with the Company to which the NEO is a party, which continues beyond the Cure Period (to the extent that, in the Board of Directors’ reasonable judgment, such breach can be cured). A termination for Cause shall be effective when

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

the Company has given the NEO written notice of its intention to terminate for Cause, describing those acts or omissions that are believed to constitute Cause, and has given the NEO the Cure Period within which to respond.

“Good Reason” means any of the following actions if taken without an NEO’s prior written consent (which will be deemed to have been given if the NEO does not provide written notification of an event described in clauses (1) and (2) within 90 days after the NEO knows or has reason to know of the occurrence of any such event): (1) a material adverse change in the NEO’s position causing it to be of materially less stature, responsibility, or authority or the assignment to the NEO of any material duties inconsistent with the customary duties of the NEO’s position, in each case without the NEO’s written consent (provided that if, after an initial public offering of equity securities of the Company, at a later date the Company or its successor entity ceases to be a publicly traded entity, such fact shall not constitute a change in the NEO’s existing position); (2) the relocation of the offices at which the NEO is principally employed to a location which is more than 50 miles from the offices at which the NEO is principally employed immediately prior to such relocation; or (3) a reduction, without the NEO’s written consent, in the NEO’s base salary or the target bonus amount the NEO is eligible to earn under the MIP; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed to guarantee the NEO’s MIP award payable for any fiscal year if the applicable performance targets are not met; and provided, further, that it shall not constitute Good Reason if the Company makes an appropriate pro rata adjustment to the applicable amount payable and targets under the MIP in the event of a change in the fiscal year.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, any event described in clauses (1) or (2) above must be an event that would result in a material negative change in the Executive’s employment relationship with the Company and thus effectively constitute an involuntary termination of employment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code.

Director Compensation in Fiscal ~~2017~~

Name
Fees Earned or
Paid In Cash
($)
Option
Awards
($)⁽¹⁾
Total
($)
Brandon F. Brahm

—

—

—

William P. Donnelly⁽²⁾

75,000

400,000

475,000

John Humphrey⁽³⁾

—

—

—

William E. Kassling

75,000

⁽¹⁾

75,000

Michael V. Marn

75,000

⁽¹⁾

75,000

Peter M. Stavros

—

—

—

Nickolas Vande Steeg

75,000

⁽¹⁾

75,000

Pastor Velasco⁽⁴⁾

75,000

422,519
⁽¹⁾

497,519

Joshua T. Weisenbeck

—

—

—

2021

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)⁽¹⁾	Option Awards ($)⁽²⁾	Total ($)
Kirk E. Arnold	77,500	175,000	―	252,500
Elizabeth Centoni	75,000	175,000	―	250,000
William P. Donnelly	100,000	175,000	(2)	375,000
Gary D. Forsee	85,000	175,000	―	260,000
John Humphrey	100,000	175,000	―	375,000
Marc E. Jones	81,250	175,000	―	256,250
Vicente Reynal	―	―	―	―
Peter M. Stavros⁽³⁾	―	―	―	―
Joshua T. Weisenbeck⁽³⁾	―	―	―	―
Tony L. White	75,000	175,000	―	250,000

(1)

Represents ~~as to Mr. Donnelly,~~ the aggregate grant date fair value of ~~option~~stock awards granted during ~~2017~~2021 computed in accordance with ~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)~~FASB ASC Topic ~~718 and, as to Mr. Velasco, the incremental fair value, computed~~718. The aggregate number of RSUs outstanding as of ~~the modification date,~~December 31, 2021 for each of Mses. Arnold and Centoni and Messrs. Donnelly, Forsee, Humphrey, Jones and White was 3,839. These restricted stock units vested in ~~connection with the modification of his outstanding option award.~~ full on February 23, 2022.

(2)

In May 2017, we granted 44,799 time-vesting options to Mr. Donnelly (the “Donnelly Time Options”)~~. Of~~ to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share. All of the Donnelly Time Options ~~22,399~~ are fully vested and exercisable. ~~The remaining 22,400 Donnelly Time Options will vest~~

(3)

Messrs. Stavros and ~~become exercisable on December 31, 2018. In October 2017, in connection with his resignation~~Weisenbeck resigned from our Board, Mr. Velasco and the Company agreed that Mr. Velasco’s options would remain outstanding and eligible to vest as if he had continued to provide services to the Company through each applicable vesting date.

In December 2013, we granted 57,534 time-vesting options (the “Director Time Options”) to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.16 per share to each non-employee director who was not associated with our Sponsor: Messrs. Kassling, Marn, Vande Steeg and Velasco. Of the Director Time Options, 46,026 are fully vested and exercisable. The remaining 11,507 Director Time Options will vest and become exercisable on December 31, 2018.

~~(2)~~

~~Mr. Donnelly joined~~ our Board of Directors in ~~May 2017.~~

~~(3)~~

~~Mr. Humphrey joined our Board of Directors in February 2018.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Mr. Velasco resigned from our Board in October 2017.~~November 2021. In connection with ~~his resignation, Mr. Velasco and~~their resignations, the Company ~~agreed that Mr. Velasco’s options would remain outstanding and eligible~~reduced the size of the Board from ten to ~~vest as if he had continued to provide services to the Company through each applicable vesting date.~~eight directors.

Description of Director Compensation

This section contains a description of the material terms of our compensation arrangements for our non-employee directors in ~~2017.~~

2021.

Former Directors Associated with KKR

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Sponsor Directors~~

Our former non-employee directors associated with ~~KKR, including~~Kohlberg Kravis and Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”), Messrs. ~~Brahm,~~ Stavros and Weisenbeck, received no compensation for their service on our Board of Directors in ~~2017.~~

2021.

Messrs. Donnelley, ~~Kassling, Marn, Vande Steeg~~Forsee, Humphrey, Jones and ~~Velasco~~

~~Each~~White and Mses. Arnold and Centoni

Following a competitive market assessment of ~~Messrs. Donnelly, Kassling, Marn, Vande Steeg and Velasco was entitled to receive an annual $75,000~~non-employee director compensation conducted by Pearl Meyer in connection with the Merger, the Board adopted the following director compensation program for each of our non-employee directors not associated with KKR.

Annual cash retainer ~~for his service on the Board~~ of ~~Directors in fiscal 2017,~~$75,000, payable quarterly in arrears and ~~pro-rated~~prorated for any ~~portion~~partial year of ~~a calendar quarter during which he commences or terminates service~~service;

Additional annual cash retainer of $25,000, payable quarterly in arrears, for serving as the chairperson of our Audit Committee and an additional $10,000 annual cash retainer, payable quarterly in arrears, for serving as a ~~director,~~member of such committee, prorated, in each case, for any partial year of service;

Additional annual cash retainer of $15,000, payable quarterly in arrears, for serving as ~~well as reimbursement~~the chairperson of ~~his~~our Compensation Committee, Nominating Governance Committee or our Sustainability Committee, prorated, in each case, for any partial year of service; and

An annual equity award having a fair market value of $175,000, payable in RSUs, which vests on the anniversary of the grant date.

Our directors were not paid any fees for attending meetings, however, our directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses associated with attendance at Board or committee meetings. ~~In addition,~~

Effective as of January 1, 2022, the retainer amounts described above for serving as a member or chairperson of our Board committees will be paid in the form of RSUs. Additionally, our Lead Director, Mr. Donnelly, ~~was eligible to~~will receive an annual ~~$25,000 cash retainer for his service as chairperson~~equity award having a fair market value of $35,000, payable in RSUs,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

which vests on the anniversary of the ~~Audit Committee, payable in quarterly installments in arrears~~grant date, to compensate him for the additional time and pro-rated for any portion of a calendar quarter during which he commences or terminates service as chairperson of the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors also approved in 2017 an annual $25,000 cash retainer for any non-employee director notresponsibilities associated with ~~KKR who serves as chairperson~~this role. We believe that an equity-focused compensation scheme for our directors strengthens the alignment of the Compensation Committee, payable in quarterly installments in arrears and pro-rated for any portion of a calendar quarter during which such director commences or terminates service as chairperson of the Compensation Committee; however, Mr. Stavros, the chairpersoninterests of our ~~Compensation Committee was ineligible to receive compensation for his service.~~

directors and stockholders.

In connection with his election to our Board of Directors, Mr. Donnelly received the Donnelly Time Options, a grant of options under the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan with a fair value of $400,000, which vested and ~~vesting and becoming~~became exercisable in equal parts on December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018.

In addition, in December 2013, we granted each of Messrs. Kassling, Marn, Vande Steeg and Velasco 57,534 Director Time Options pursuant to the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan. Prior to our initial public offering, we also gave our non-employee directors not associated with our sponsor the opportunity to make investments in our common stock, subject to satisfaction of applicable securities law requirements, and each of Messrs. Marn and Vande Steeg has done so.

The Director Time Options vested and became exercisable or will vest and become exercisable with respect to 20% of such Director Time Options on December 31st of each of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, subject to the director’s continued service through such date.

Vested ~~Director Time Options and~~ Donnelly Time Options expire upon the earliest to occur of the following events: (1) the tenth anniversary of the date such options were granted; (2) the first anniversary of the cessation of ~~the director’s~~Mr. Donnelly’s service to the Company because of death or Disability (as defined in the option award agreement); (3) one hundred eighty (180) days after the cessation of ~~the director’s~~Mr. Donnelly’s service to the Company without Cause (as defined in the option award agreement) (except due to death or Disability); (4) the date ~~the director’s~~Mr. Donnelly’s service is terminated by the Company for Cause; or (5) pursuant to the repurchase rights in the Director Stockholder’s Agreement described below. In addition, at the discretion of the Company, options may be cancelled at the effective date of a merger, consolidation, or other transaction or capital change of the Company, in accordance with the terms of the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, in exchange for a payment (payable in cash or other consideration depending on the terms of the transaction) per share equal to the excess of (x) the per share consideration paid to stockholders of the Company in the transaction over (y) the exercise price of the option.

Except as described below with respect to Mr. Velasco’s Director Time Options, the Director Time Options and the Donnelly Time Options will not become exercisable as to any additional shares following the cessation of director’s service to the Company for any reason except in connection with a Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, immediately prior to any Change in Control (as defined in “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2017— Terms of Equity Awards”), any unvested portion of the Director Time Options and Donnelly Time Options shall vest and become immediately exercisable as to 100% of such Time Options.

~~On October 23, 2017, in~~

In connection with his resignation from our Board of Directors, we agreed to allow Mr. Velasco’s unvested Director Time Options to remain outstanding and eligible to vest following Mr. Velasco’s resignation as if Mr. Velasco had continued to provide services to the Company through each applicable vesting date. The incremental fair value in connection with such modification is reflected in the “Option Awards” column of the “Director Compensation in Fiscal 2017” table above.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~In connection with their~~ option awards, ~~each of Messrs.~~Mr. Donnelly ~~Kassling, Marn, Vande Steeg and Velasco~~ became party to a Director Stockholder’s Agreement.

Under the Director Stockholder’s Agreement, shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our directors are generally nontransferable prior to the earlier of (i) a Change in Control or (ii) the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the applicable Director Stockholder’s Agreement.

Our directors party to a Director Stockholder’s Agreement have limited “piggyback” registration rights with respect to shares of our common stock, provided that in lieu of piggyback rights where such rights would otherwise be available, our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may elect to waive the transfer restrictions (other than any such restrictions contained in an underwriters’ lock-up or in connection with a public offering) on the number of shares of Common Stock that would have been subject to such piggyback rights.

~~Pursuant to the terms of the Director Stockholder’s Agreement, the directors party to such agreement are~~Mr. Donnelly is subject to covenants not to (1) disclose confidential information, (2) solicit customers and certain employees, consultants and independent contractors of the Company, (3) compete with the Company and (4) disparage the Company.

~~Mr. Humphrey~~

Mr. Humphrey, who joined our Board on February 7, 2018, will be entitled to receive the compensation described below under “Director Compensation in 2018.” However, while our directors who served prior to 2018 will not receive their first annual equity grant until 2019, in February 2018 Mr. Humphrey received an award of restricted stock units having a fair market value of $125,000 which vests on the anniversary of the grant date.

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

Our directors are also subject to the stock ownership guidelines and retention policy described under ~~“—Compensation~~“Compensation Discussion and ~~Analysis—~~Analysis―Other Compensation Practices and Policies that Align Our NEOs to Our Stockholders―Stock Ownership and Retention Policy.”

~~Director Compensation in 2018~~

Following a competitive market assessment of non-employee director compensation conducted by Pearl Meyer, the Board adopted the following director compensation program for each of our non-employee directors not associated with KKR:

~~Cash retainer of $75,000, payable quarterly in arrears;~~

Additional cash retainer of $25,000 payable quarterly in arrears for serving as the chairperson of our Audit Committee or $12,500 payable quarterly in arrears for serving as the chairperson of our Compensation Committee; and

~~An annual equity award having a fair market value of $125,000 payable in restricted stock units which vests on the anniversary of the grant date.~~

Our directors will not be paid any fees for attending meetings, however, our directors will be reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses associated with attendance at Board or committee meetings. Because each of our non-employee directors not associated with KKR other than Mr. Humphrey was granted an equity award at or before our initial public offering, such directors will not receive their first equity awards under our newly-adopted director compensation program until 2019.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During ~~2017, none~~2021, each of Messrs. Weisenbeck, Donnelly and Jones and Ms. Arnold served on our Compensation Committee. None of the current, or in the case of Mr. Weisenbeck, former, members of our Compensation Committee has at any time been one of our executive officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (“Item 402(u)”), the Company is providing the following information regarding the relationship of the annual total compensation of Vicente Reynal, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) to the median all of our employees (except Mr. Reynal), calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u). For 2021, our last completed fiscal year:

The median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees, excluding our CEO, was $51,757.

The annual total compensation of our CEO was $10,613,486.

Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees except our CEO was 205:1.

We ~~are parties to certain transactions with KKR described below under “Item 13. Certain Relationships~~determined that, as of December 31, 2021, our employee population consisted of 15,454 individuals, including full time, part time, and ~~Related Transactions,~~temporary employees.

To identify our “median employee” from this employee population, we obtained annual base salary and ~~Director Independence—Transactions with Related Persons”.~~

target annual bonus information as of December 31, 2021 from our internal payroll records for each employee in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our employee population. We believe this consistently applied compensation measure reasonably reflects annual compensation across our employee base. Base salary amounts for employees located outside the United States and compensated in currencies other than U.S. dollars were converted to U.S. dollars based on the average annual exchange rate for 2021. We then ranked the resulting annual base salary plus target annual bonus amounts for all of the employees in the employee population other than our CEO to determine our median employee. Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2021 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K for the Summary Compensation Table. With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table set forth above in this Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of ~~March 14, 2018~~April 20, 2022 by: (1) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (2) each of the named executive officers, (3) each of our directors and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

As of ~~March 14, 2018,~~April 20, 2022, there were ~~197,223,598~~406,123,328 shares of our common stock outstanding.

Name of beneficial owner
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Common
Stock
Outstanding
Beneficial Owners of More than 5%

Investment funds affiliated with KKR⁽¹⁾

121,157,473

61.4
%
Directors and Named Executive Officers:

Vicente Reynal⁽²⁾

1,280,024

*
Philip T. Herndon⁽²⁾

538,305

*
Andrew Schiesl⁽²⁾

352,318

*
Neil D. Snyder⁽²⁾

222,721

*
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽²⁾

60,076

*
Peter M. Stavros⁽³⁾

—

—

Brandon F. Brahm⁽³⁾

—

—

William P. Donnelly⁽²⁾

65,041

*
John Humphrey

—

*
William E. Kassling⁽²⁾

376,003

*
Michael V. Marn⁽²⁾

46,026

*
Nickolas Vande Steeg⁽²⁾

222,920

*
Joshua T. Weisenbeck⁽³⁾

—

—

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)⁽²⁾

3,402,830

1.7
%

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes common stock of which that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of April 20, 2022.

Name of beneficial owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Common Stock Outstanding
Beneficial Owners of More than 5%
The Vanguard Group⁽¹⁾	43,230,549	10.6%
T. Rowe Price⁽²⁾	57,765,282	14.2%
Artisan⁽³⁾	22,816,001	5.6%
BlackRock, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	29,189,900	7.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.⁽⁵⁾	24,335,011	6.0%
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Vicente Reynal⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾	2,013,113	*
Vikram Kini⁽⁶⁾	241,519	*
Andrew Schiesl⁽⁶⁾	139,245	*
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽⁶⁾	172,013	*
Michael A. Weatherred⁽⁶⁾	48,148	*
Kirk E. Arnold	10,963	*
Elizabeth Centoni	14,757	*
William P. Donnelly⁽⁶⁾	102,198	*
Gary D. Forsee	34,417	*
John Humphrey	18,656	*
Marc E. Jones	14,757	*
Tony L. White	33,938	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons⁽⁶⁾)	3,043,368	*

Less than 1 percent

(1)

~~(1)~~

~~Includes 121,157,473~~Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2022 on behalf of The Vanguard Group and its subsidiaries, Vanguard Asset Management, Limited, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, Vanguard Global Advisors, LLC, Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited, Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd, Vanguard Investments Canada Inc., Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited and Vanguard Investments UK, Limited. According to the schedule, included in the shares ~~directly~~of our common stock listed above as beneficially owned by ~~KKR Renaissance Aggregator L.P. KKR Renaissance Aggregator GP LLC, as the general partner of KKR Renaissance Aggregator L.P., KKR North America Fund XI L.P., as the~~The Vanguard Group are 0 shares over which The Vanguard Group has sole member of KKR Renaissance Aggregator GP LLC, KKR Associates North America XI L.P., as the general partner of KKR North America Fund XI L.P., KKR North America XI Limited, as the general partner of KKR Associates North America XI L.P., KKR Fund Holdings L.P., as the sole shareholder of KKR North America XI Limited, KKR Fund Holdings GP Limited, as a general partner of KKR Fund Holdings L.P., KKRvoting power, 639,789 shares over which The Vanguard Group Holdings L.P., as the sole shareholder of KKR Fund Holdings GP Limited and a general partner of KKR Fund Holdings L.P., KKR Group Limited, as the general partner of KKR Group Holdings L.P., KKR & Co. L.P., as the sole shareholder of KKR Group Limited, KKR Management LLC, as the general partner of KKR & Co. L.P., and Messrs. Henry R. Kravis and George R. Roberts, as the designated members of KKR Management LLC may be deemed to be the beneficial owners havinghas shared voting power, 41,590,210 shares over which The Vanguard Group has sole dispositive power and ~~investment~~1,640,339 shares over which The Vanguard Group has shared dispositive power. The address of the principal business office of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(2)

Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2022 on behalf of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“Price Associates”). According to the schedule, included in the shares of our common stock listed above as beneficially owned by Price Associates, are 22,936,866 over which Price Associates has sole voting power, 0 shares over which Price Associates has shared voting power, 57,765,282 shares over which Price Associates has sole dispositive power and 0 shares over which Price Associates has shared dispositive power. According to the schedule, Price Associates does not serve as custodian of the assets of any of its clients; accordingly, in each instance only the client or the client’s custodian or trustee bank has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the ~~shares described~~sale of, such securities. The ultimate power to direct the receipt of dividends paid with respect to, and the proceeds from the sale of, such securities, is vested in ~~this footnote.~~the individual and institutional clients which Price Associates serves as investment adviser. Any and all discretionary authority which has been delegated to Price Associates may be revoked in whole or in part at any time. According to the schedule, except as may be indicated if the filing is a joint filing with one of the registered investment companies sponsored by Price Associates which it also serves as an investment adviser not more than 5% of the class of such securities is owned by any one client subject to the investment advice of Price Associates. The principal business address of ~~each of~~Price Associates and Price Growth Fund is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.

(3)

Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in the ~~entities~~Schedule 13G filed on February 4, 2022 by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership (“APLP”), Artisan Investments GP LLC (“Artisan Investments”), Artisan Partners Holdings LP (“Artisan Holdings”) and ~~persons identified~~Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (“APAM”) (APLP, Artisan Investments, Artisan Holdings, and APAM,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

collectively, “Artisan”), in which Artisan reported that it has sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 19,699,722 shares, sole dispositive power over 0 shares and shared dispositive power over 22,816,001 shares of the Company. According to the schedule, Artisan Holdings is the sole limited partner of APLP and the sole member of Artisan Investments; Artisan Investments is the general partner of APLP; APAM is the general partner of Artisan Holdings. The principal business address of each of APLP, Artisan Investments, Artisan Holdings, and APAM is 875 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800 Milwaukee, WI 53202.

(4)

Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in ~~this paragraph, except Mr. Roberts, is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &~~the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 3, 2022 by BlackRock, Inc. in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that it has sole voting power over 25,793,861 shares and sole dispositive power over 29,189,900 shares held by BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co. ~~L.P.~~, ~~9 West 57th Street, Suite 4200, New York, NY 10019.~~Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock (Singapore) Limited and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. The principal business address ~~for Mr. Roberts~~of BlackRock, Inc. is ~~c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts~~55 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10055.

(5)

Beneficial ownership information is based on information contained in the Schedule 13G filed on January 24, 2022 by JPMorgan Chase & Co. ~~L.P.~~(“JPM”), ~~2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 200, Menlo Park, CA 94025.~~in which JPM reported that it has sole voting power over 22,680,356 shares, shared voting power over 126,176, sole dispositive power over 23,925,610 shares and shared dispositive power over 400,979 shares held by J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Asset Management (ASIA PACIFIC) Limited, JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, J.P.Morgan (Suisse) SA, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, J.P. Morgan Private Investments Inc. The principal business address of JPM is 383 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10179.

~~(2)~~(6)

The number of shares reported includes shares covered by options that are exercisable within 60 days and RSUs that vest within 60 days as follows: Mr. Reynal, ~~1,047,998;~~1,662,979; Mr. ~~Herndon, 368,737;~~Gillespie, 93,821; Ms. Keene, 9,442; Mr. Kendall-Jones, 67,246; Mr. Kini, 221,396; Mr. Schiesl, ~~352,318; Mr. Snyder, 194,460;~~60,949; Mr. Miñarro Viseras, ~~54,428;~~147,313; Mr. Weatherred, 35,471; Mr. Donnelly, ~~22,399; Mr. Kassling, 46,026; Mr. Marn, 46,026; Mr, Vande Steeg, 46,026;~~44,799; all directors and executive officers as a group, ~~2,384,749.~~2,343,416.

(7)	The number of shares reported includes 75,000 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Reynal’s descendants, 153,230 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Reynal and his spouse and 22,500 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Reynal’s spouse and descendants.

~~(3)~~

~~The principal business address of each of Messrs. Stavros, Weisenbeck and Brahm is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.~~

DELINQUENT SECTION ~~16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE~~

16(a) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the ~~Exchange~~1934 Act requires ~~executive~~the Company’s Directors and certain officers, ~~and directors, a company’s chief accounting officer and~~as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of ~~a company’s common stock~~the outstanding shares of Common Stock, to file reports regarding their initial ~~reports of~~stock ownership and ~~reports of~~subsequent changes into their ownership with the ~~SEC~~SEC.

Based solely on a review of the reports filed for fiscal year 2021 and the ~~NYSE. Executive officers, directors,~~period through the ~~chief accounting officer~~date hereof and ~~beneficial owners with more than 10% of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of~~related written representations and except as previously reported, we believe that all Section 16(a) ~~forms they file.~~

~~Based solely~~reports were filed on ~~our review~~a timely basis, except as follows: (i) for Elizabeth Meloy Hepding, a late Form 3 filing and a late Form 4 filing related to a grant of ~~copies~~RSUs and stock options, (ii) for Kathleen M. Keene, a late Form 4 filing related to a grant of ~~such reports~~RSUs and ~~written representations from our executive officers, directors~~stock options, (iii) for Michael J. Scheske, a timely filed Form 4 that inadvertently reported an incorrect number of shares underlying a grant of RSUs and ~~KKR, we believe~~stock options, in each case, due to administrative oversight and (iv) for Vikram Kini, a timely filed Form 4 that ~~our executive officers, directors and KKR complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during 2017.~~

inadvertently reported an incorrect balance of shares held due to an administrative computational error.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Arrangements with ~~Our Executive Officers, Directors~~KKR, a Former Related Party

Affiliates of KKR served on the Company’s board of directors until November 2021 and ~~Advisors~~

We have entered into letter agreements with certain members of management, including each of our executive officers, and our directors and certain advisors, pursuant to which such individuals agreed to invest in our stock and/or through the purchase of our shares with cash. In addition, our Board of Directors granted options to purchase shares of our common stock to certain members of management and key employees, including to our executive officers. In connection with the grants of new options describedKKR maintained an equity interest above ~~the participating members of our management, including our executive officers, were required to enter into a Management Stockholder’s Agreement as well as a stock option agreement, as applicable.~~

Below is a brief summary of the principal terms of the Management Stockholder’s Agreements, the Director Stockholder’s Agreements and the Advisor Stockholder’s Agreements, which are qualified in their entirety by reference to the agreements themselves, forms of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Management, Director and Advisor Stockholder’s Agreements~~

The Management Stockholder’s Agreements impose significant restrictions on transfers of shares of our common stock. Generally, shares held by our management are nontransferable by any means at any time prior to the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined5% in the Management Stockholder’s Agreements) or (ii) the later to occur of (a) the fifth anniversary of the execution of the applicable Management Stockholder’s Agreement or (b) the consummation of an Initial Public Offering (as defined in the Management Stockholder’s Agreements). These transfer restrictions are subject to certain exceptions, including transfers approved by our Board of Directors; transfers upon the death or Disability (as defined in the Management Stockholder’s Agreements) of the holder; transfers to immediate family members or estate planning vehicles, provided such transferees become party to the applicable Management Stockholder’s Agreement; or repurchases of such shares by the Company.

~~Additionally, management stockholders have limited “piggyback” registration rights with respect to certain registered offerings conducted by the Company. The maximum number of~~Company until August 2021. KKR did not own any shares of common stock as of December 31, 2021.

As a result, KKR is no longer considered a related party of the Company covered by Item 403(a) of Regulation S-K.

However, KKR was a greater than 5% holder and thus a related party of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2021, and at the time that the following transactions and arrangements were in effect, which therefore requires such transactions and arrangements to be reported in this Proxy Statement.

Secondary Offering

On August 6, 2021, KKR completed a ~~management stockholder may register is generally proportionate with the percentage~~secondary offering to sell its remaining 29,788,635 shares of common stock, ~~being sold by certain affiliates~~of which Ingersoll Rand purchased 14,894,317 shares for $49.05 per share (the “Final Offering”).

Resignation of KKR ~~(relative to their holdings thereof). The Management Stockholder’s Agreements also contain certain lock-up provisions~~Nominated Board Members

As a result of the Final Offering, Messrs. Stavros and Weisenbeck resigned from our Board in ~~the event that any shares~~November 2021 and there are ~~offered to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act.~~

~~The Director Stockholder’s Agreements and Advisor Stockholder’s Agreements are substantially similar to the Management Stockholder’s Agreements.~~no KKR nominated directors serving on our Board. In addition to certain exceptions to transfer restrictions related to piggyback rights available to Management Stockholders, the Director and Advisor Stockholder’s Agreements further provide that in lieu of piggyback registration rights in connection with ~~a public offering in which such piggyback rights would otherwise be available,~~their resignations, the Company reduced the size of the Board from ten to eight directors.

Termination of ~~Directors may waive transfer restrictions with respect to the number of shares that would have been subject to such piggyback rights.~~

~~Arrangements with KKR~~

Stockholders Agreement

and Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into a stockholders agreement with certain affiliates of ~~KKR. This agreement grants affiliates of~~ KKR, the right to nominate to our Board of Directors a number of designees equal to: (i) at least a majority of the total number of directors comprising our Board of Directors at such time as long as affiliates of KKR beneficially own at least 50% of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors; (ii) at least 40% of the total number of directors comprising our Board of Directors at such time as long as affiliates of KKR beneficially own at least 40% but less than 50% of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors; (iii) at least 30% of the total number of directors comprising our Board of Directors at such time as long as affiliates of KKR beneficially own at least 30% but less than 40% of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors; (iv) at least 20% of the total number of directors comprising our Board of Directors at such time as long as affiliates of KKR beneficially own at least 20% but less 30% of the

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors; and (v) at least 10% of the total number of directors comprising our Board of Directors at such time as long as affiliates of KKR beneficially own at least 5% but less than 20% of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors. For purposes of calculating the number of directors that affiliates of KKR are entitled to nominate pursuant to the formula outlined above, any fractional amounts would be rounded up to the nearest whole number and the calculation would be made on a pro forma basis, taking into account any increase in the size of our Board of Directors (e.g., one and one quarter (1^1/4) directors shall equate to two directors). In addition, in the event a vacancy on the Board of Directors is created by the death, disability, retirement or resignation of a Sponsor director designee, affiliates of KKR shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, have the right to have the vacancy filled by a new Sponsor director-designee. In addition, thewhich stockholders agreement ~~grants to~~was subsequently amended on April 30, 2019, in connection with the Merger, and provided KKR ~~special governance rights, for as long as KKR maintains ownership of at least 30% of our outstanding common stock, including rights of approval over~~with certain ~~corporate and other transactions such as mergers or other transactions involving a change in control and certain rights regarding the appointment of our chief executive officer.~~

~~Registration Rights Agreement~~

director nomination rights. In connection with ~~the~~our acquisition by KKR ~~Transaction,~~on July 30, 2013 (the “KKR Transaction”), certain affiliates of KKR entered into a registration rights agreement with us. In connection with the completion of our initial public offering, we and KKR entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement. ~~The amended and restated registration rights agreement grants such affiliates~~These agreements are no longer in effect as of ~~KKR~~ the ~~right to cause us to register shares~~Final Offering. For a summary of the material terms of these agreements, see our ~~common stock held by it~~Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 29, 2021, under the Securities Act and, if requested, to use our reasonable best efforts (if we are not eligible to use an automatic shelf registration statement at the time of filing) to maintain a shelf registration statement effective“Transactions with respect to such shares. Certain affiliates of KKR are also entitled to participate on a pro rata basis in any registration of our common stock under the Securities Act that we may undertake. The amended and restated registration rights agreement also provides that we will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and indemnify certain affiliates of KKR and members of management participating in any offering against certain liabilities, which may arise under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, any state securities law or any rule or regulation thereunder applicable to us.

~~Monitoring~~Related Persons―Arrangements with KKR.”

Indemnification Agreement

In connection with the KKR Transaction, we entered into a monitoring agreement with KKR pursuant to which KKR provided various management and advisory services to us and our direct and indirect divisions, subsidiaries, parent entities and controlled affiliates and received fees and reimbursements of related out-of-pocket expenses. We paid management fees of $17.3 million to KKR for the year ended December 31, 2017. In May 2017, the monitoring agreement was terminated in accordance with its terms and we paid a termination fee of approximately $16.2 million.

~~Indemnification Agreement~~

~~In connection with entering into the monitoring agreement,~~ we also entered into a separate indemnification agreement with KKR and certain of its affiliates, which provides customary exculpation and indemnification provisions in favor of KKR and such affiliates in connection with the services provided to us under ~~the~~ monitoring, transaction fee and syndication fee ~~agreements.~~

~~Relationship~~agreements we entered into with KKR ~~Capstone Americas LLC~~

~~We have utilized and may continue to utilize KKR Capstone Americas LLC and/~~or its affiliates (“KKR Capstone”), a consulting company that works exclusively with KKR’s portfolio companies, for consulting services, and have paid to KKR Capstone related fees and expenses. KKR Capstone is not a subsidiary or affiliate of KKR. KKR Capstone operates under several consulting agreements with KKR and uses the “KKR” name under license from KKR.

~~Relationship with KKR Credit~~

Since 2014, investment funds or accounts managed or advised by the global credit business of KKR (“KKR Credit”) were participating lenders under our existing credit agreements and holders of notes issued by us, and as of December 31, 2017, had received in aggregate principal payments of approximately $0.5 million and interest payments of approximately $4.0 million. As of December 31, 2017, investment funds or accounts managed or advised by KKR Credit held a position in the debt of the Company.

otherwise.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~Financing Arrangements with Related Parties~~

In May 2017, KKR Capital Markets LLC, an affiliate of KKR, acted as an underwriter in connection with the initial public offering of the Company’s stock and received underwriter discounts and commissions of approximately $8.9 million. In August 2017, KKR Capital Markets LLC received $1.5 million for services rendered in connection with a debt refinancing transaction. In November 2017, KKR Capital Markets LLC acted as an underwriter in connection with an offering of Company’s stock by certain selling shareholders, and earned underwriter discounts and commissions of approximately $3.5 million.

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons, which we refer to as our “related person transaction policy.” Our related person transaction policy requires that (a) any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) be approved or ratified by an approving body comprised of the disinterested members of our Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors (provided that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or such committee, respectively, are disinterested) and (b) any employment relationship or transaction involving an executive officer and any related compensation be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or recommended by the Compensation Committee to the Board of Directors for its approval. In connection with the review and approval or ratification of a related person transaction:

management must disclose to the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, the name of the related person and the basis on which the person is a related person, the material terms of the related person transaction, including the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction, and all the material facts as to the related person’s direct or indirect interest in, or relationship to, the related person transaction;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

management must advise the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction complies with the terms of our agreements governing our material outstanding indebtedness that limit or restrict our ability to enter into a related person transaction;

management must advise the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction will be required to be disclosed in our applicable filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, and related rules, and, to the extent required to be disclosed, management must ensure that the related person transaction is disclosed in accordance with such Acts and related rules; and

management must advise the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, as to whether the related person transaction constitutes a “personal loan” for purposes of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In addition, the related person transaction policy provides that the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, in connection with any approval or ratification of a related person transaction involving a non-employee director or director nominee, should consider whether such transaction would compromise the director or director nominee’s status as an ~~“independent,” “outside,”~~“independent” or “non-employee” director, as applicable, under the rules and regulations of the SEC ~~the NYSE~~ and the ~~Internal Revenue Code.~~

NYSE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE ~~2019~~2023 ANNUAL MEETING

If any stockholder wishes to propose a matter for consideration at our ~~2019~~2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proposal should be mailed by certified mail return receipt requested, to our Corporate Secretary, ~~Gardner Denver Holdings,~~Ingersoll Rand Inc., ~~222 East Erie Street,~~525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.~~600, Davidson, North Carolina 28036. To be eligible under the SEC’s stockholder proposal rule (Rule 14a-8(e) of the Exchange Act) for inclusion in our ~~2019~~2023 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement and form of proxy, a proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary on or before ~~November 27, 2018.~~December 30, 2022. Failure to deliver a proposal in accordance with this procedure may result in it not being deemed timely received.

In addition, our ~~bylaws~~Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors and present other business for consideration at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. To make a director nomination or present other business

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

for consideration at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in ~~2019,~~2023, you must submit a timely notice in accordance with the procedures described in our ~~by-laws.~~Bylaws. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Corporate Secretary at the principal executive offices of our Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Therefore, to be presented at our Annual Meeting to be held in ~~2019,~~2023, such a proposal must be received on or after ~~January 10, 2019,~~February 16, 2023, but not later than ~~February 9, 2019.~~March 18, 2023. In the event that the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in ~~2019~~2023 is advanced by more than 30 days, or delayed by more than 70 days, from the anniversary date of this year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, such notice by the stockholder must be so received no earlier than 120 days prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in ~~2019~~2023 and not later than the later of the 90th day prior to such Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in ~~2019~~2023 or ten (10) calendar days following the day on which public announcement of the date of such Annual Meeting is first made. Any such proposal will be considered timely only if it is otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in our ~~bylaws.~~Bylaws. The proxy solicited by the Board for the ~~2019~~2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will confer discretionary authority to vote as the proxy holders deem advisable on such stockholder proposals which are considered untimely.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than our nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 17, 2023.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or a single notice addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” provides cost savings for companies by reducing printing and mailing costs and helps the environment by conserving natural resources. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding materials to your address, householding will generally continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, or if your household is receiving multiple copies of these documents and you wish to request that future deliveries be limited to a single copy, please notify your broker. If your household received a single Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if applicable, a single set of proxy materials this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, please contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll free number, 1-866-540-7095 or by writing to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your instructions at which time you will then be sent separate copies of the documents.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board does not know of any other matters to be brought before the meeting. If other matters are presented, the proxy holders have discretionary authority to vote all proxies in accordance with their best judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Andrew Schiesl

Corporate Secretary

We make available, free of charge on our website, all of our filings that are made electronically with the SEC, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. To access these filings, go to our website (~~www.gardnerdenver.com~~)www.irco.com) and click on ~~“SEC~~“Financials―SEC Filings” under the “Investors” heading.

Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2021, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to stockholders upon written request addressed to:

Corporate Secretary
~~Gardner Denver Holdings,~~

Ingersoll Rand Inc.
~~222 East Erie Street,~~

525 Harbor Place Drive, Suite ~~500~~600
~~Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202~~

Davidson, North Carolina 28036

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ANNEX A

Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures

In addition to consolidated GAAP financial measures, Ingersoll Rand reviews various non-GAAP financial measures, including “Adjusted EBITDA,” “Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA,” and “Supplemental Adjusted Revenue.”

Ingersoll Rand believes Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA and Supplemental Adjusted Revenue are helpful supplemental measures to assist management and investors in evaluating the Company’s operating results as they provide supplemental information about the Company’s financial performance on a combined basis as if the Merger had occurred on January 1, 2019. Ingersoll Rand believes Adjusted EBITDA, Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA, and Supplemental Adjusted Revenue are helpful supplemental measures to assist management and investors in evaluating the Company’s operating results as they exclude certain items that are unusual in nature or whose fluctuation from period to period do not necessarily correspond to changes in the operations of Ingersoll Rand’s business. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain non-cash, non-recurring and other adjustment items. Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA represents Adjusted EBITDA as if the Merger had occurred on January 1, 2019. Ingersoll Rand believes that the adjustments applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA and Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors about certain material non-cash items and about non-recurring items that the Company does not expect to continue at the same level in the future. Supplemental Adjusted Revenue represents revenue for the Company as if the Merger had occurred on January 1, 2019.

Management and Ingersoll Rand’s board of directors regularly use these measures as tools in evaluating the Company’s operating and financial performance and in establishing discretionary annual compensation. Such measures are provided in addition to, and should not be considered to be a substitute for, or superior to, the comparable measures under GAAP. In addition, Ingersoll Rand believes that Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of issuers, many of which also present Adjusted EBITDA when reporting their results in an effort to facilitate an understanding of their operating and financial results and liquidity.

Adjusted EBITDA, Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA and Supplemental Adjusted Revenue should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA, Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA and Supplemental Adjusted Revenue have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider such measures either in isolation or as substitutes for analyzing Ingersoll Rand’s results as reported under GAAP.

Reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA, Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA and Supplemental Adjusted Revenue to their most comparable U.S. GAAP financial metrics for historical periods are presented in the tables below.

A-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGERSOLL RAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED ADJUSTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY SEGMENT

(Dollars in millions)

			For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
Ingersoll Rand
Orders			$5,764.5
Revenues			5,152.4
Adjusted EBITDA			1,191.9
Adjusted EBITDA Margin			23.1%

Industrial Technologies & Services
Orders			$4,678.8
Revenues			4,161.0

Precision & Science Technologies
Orders			$1,085.7
Revenues			991.4

A-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGERSOLL RAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO ADJUSTED EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA MARGIN

(Dollars in millions)

			For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2021
Net Income			$565.0
Less: Income from discontinued operations			121.0
Less: Income tax provision from discontinued operations			(79.4)
Income from continuing operations, net of tax			523.4
Plus:
Interest expense			87.7
Provision for income taxes			(21.8)
Depreciation expense			85.1
Amortization expense			332.9
Restructuring and related business transformation costs			18.8
Acquisition related expenses and non-cash charges			65.2
Stock-based compensation			95.9
Foreign currency transaction gains, net			(12.0)
Loss on equity method investments			11.4
Loss on extinguishment of debt			9.0
Adjustments to LIFO inventories			33.2
Gain on settlement of post-acquisition contingencies			(30.1)
Other adjustments			(6.8)
Adjusted EBITDA			$1,191.9

A-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGERSOLL RAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL ADJUSTED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY SEGMENT

(Dollars in millions)

	For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31,
	2020	2019
Ingersoll Rand
Supplemental Adjusted Orders	$4,410.4	$4,829.9
Supplemental Adjusted Revenue (non-GAAP)	4,344.4	4,907.8
Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)	933.9	960.2
Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA Margin (non-GAAP)	21.5%	19.6%

Industrial Technologies & Services
Supplemental Adjusted Orders	$3,576.2	$3,983.0
Supplemental Adjusted Revenue (non-GAAP)	3,540.0	4,057.5

Precision & Science Technologies
Supplemental Adjusted Orders	$834.2	$846.9
Supplemental Adjusted Revenue (non-GAAP)	804.4	850.3

A-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGERSOLL RAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL ADJUSTED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION RECONCILIATION OF GAAP REVENUE TO SUPPLEMENTAL ADJUSTED REVENUE BY SEGMENT AND FOR THE COMPANY

(Dollars in millions)

	For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2020			For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31, 2019
	GAAP Revenue	Adjustments⁽¹⁾	Supplemental Adjusted Revenue	GAAP Revenue	Adjustments⁽²⁾	Supplemental Adjusted Revenue
Segment
Industrial Technologies & Services	$3,248.2	$291.8	$3,540.0	$1,700.9	$2,356.6	$4,057.5
Precision & Science Technologies	725.0	79.4	804.4	316.6	533.7	850.3
Total Company	$3,973.2	$371.2	$4,344.4	$2,017.5	$2,890.3	$4,907.8

(1)	For the year ended December 31, 2020, the “Adjustments” column represents the impact of two months (January and February of 2020) of standalone legacy Ingersoll Rand Industrial Segment activity.

(2)	For the year ended December 31, 2019, the “Adjustments” column represents the impact of one full year of 2019 standalone legacy Ingersoll Rand Industrial Segment activity.

A-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INGERSOLL RAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED SUPPLEMENTAL ADJUSTED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION RECONCILIATION OF GAAP NET INCOME TO ADJUSTED EBITDA AND SUPPLEMENTAL ADJUSTED EBITDA

(Dollars in millions)

	For the Twelve Month Period Ended December 31,
	2020	2019
Net Income (Loss) (GAAP)	$(32.4)	$159.1
Less: Income from discontinued operations	26.0	80.7
Less: Income tax provision from discontinued operations	(1.6)	(18.9)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	(56.8)	97.3
Plus⁽¹⁾:
Interest expense	111.1	88.4
Provision for income taxes	11.4	12.9
Depreciation expense	75.3	41.2
Amortization expense	335.1	105.3
Impairment of intangible assets	19.9	—
Restructuring and related business transformation costs	88.0	19.6
Acquisition related expenses and non-cash charges	181.5	54.6
Stock-based compensation	47.0	20.2
Foreign currency transaction losses, net	18.6	7.3
Loss on extinguishment of debt	2.0	0.2
Shareholder litigation settlement recoveries	—	(6.0)
Adjustments to LIFO inventories	39.8	0.2
Other adjustments	5.2	0.4
Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	878.1	441.6
Additional Segment Adjusted EBITDA Adjustments⁽²⁾:
Industrial Technologies & Services	$40.3	$424.8
Precision & Science Technologies	20.4	140.2
Incremental corporate expenses not allocated to segments	(4.9)	(46.4)
Supplemental Adjusted EBITDA	933.9	960.2

(1)	These amounts are reported in accordance with US GAAP and have not been adjusted to reflect the pro forma impact of a full quarter of the newly combined Ingersoll Rand.

(2)

These “Additional Segment Adjusted EBITDA Adjustments” represent the impact of two months (January and February of 2020) of standalone legacy Ingersoll Rand Industrial Segment activity in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2020 and a full year of standalone legacy Ingersoll Rand Industrial Segment activity in the twelve month period ended December 31, 2019. The incremental corporate expenses not allocated to segments represent additional corporate expenses incurred by the Company to operate the newly combined Ingersoll Rand.

A-6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

o☐			Preliminary Proxy Statement
o☐			Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e) (2))
☒			Definitive Proxy Statement
o☐			Definitive Additional Materials
o☐			Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

☒			No fee ~~required.~~required
o☐			Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
☐			Fee computed on table ~~below~~in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and ~~0-11.~~
	~~(1)~~	~~Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:~~

	~~(2)~~	~~Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:~~

	~~(3)~~	~~Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule~~ 0-11 ~~(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):~~

	~~(4)~~	~~Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:~~

	~~(5)~~	~~Total fee paid:~~

o	~~Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.~~
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	~~(1)~~	~~Amount Previously Paid:~~

	~~(2)~~	~~Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:~~

	~~(3)~~	~~Filing Party:~~

	~~(4)~~	~~Date Filed:~~

Date		Thursday, ~~May 10, 2018~~June 16, 2022
Time		10:0030 a.m. ~~Central~~Eastern Daylight Time
~~Place~~Virtual Meeting Information		~~Kimpton Journeyman Hotel~~ ~~310 East Chicago Street~~ ~~Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202~~You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting, by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022. You will need to have your 16-Digit Control Number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to join the Annual Meeting.
Record ~~date~~date/Stockholder List		~~March 14, 2018.~~April 20, 2022. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on ~~March 14, 2018,~~April 20, 2022, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held at that time. A list of these stockholders will be open for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting during the 2022 Annual Meeting, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/IR2022 when you enter your 16-Digit Control Number and such list will be available during business hours at the Company’s corporate headquarters for the ten days preceding the Annual Meeting.
Items of business		(1) To elect the ~~three director nominees listed herein.~~eight directors named in this Proxy Statement and nominated by our board of directors to serve until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
		(2) To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for ~~2018.~~2022.
		(3) To ~~approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to the named executive officers.~~
	~~(4) To determine, in a non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes to approve the compensation paid to the named executive officers.~~
	~~(5) To consider~~transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting ~~and~~or any ~~adjournments~~adjournment or ~~postponements~~postponement thereof.
~~Virtual meeting~~	~~You may also vote at the Annual Meeting via the Internet by visiting~~ ~~www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GDI2018~~ ~~and following the instructions.~~

		Page¹
General Information		1
Proposal No. 1—1- Election of Directors		5
Director Biographies and Qualifications		6
~~Nominees for Election to the Board~~Proposal No. 2- Ratification of ~~Directors in 2018~~Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		59
~~Continuing Members of the Board of Directors~~Audit and Non-Audit Fees		79
The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters		1011
Communications with the Board		1011
Director Independence and Independence Determinations		1011
Board Structure		1012
Board Committees and Meetings		1113
Audit Committee		1113
Compensation Committee		1214
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee		15
Sustainability Committee		15
Oversight of Risk Management		1216
Executive Sessions		1316
Diversity and Sustainability		16
Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines		1318
Code of Conduct		1318
Anti-Hedging Policy		19
Director Nomination Process		1319
Executive Officers of the Company		1521
~~Proposal No. 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~	17
~~Audit and Non-Audit Fees~~	17
~~Proposal No. 3—Non-Binding Vote on Executive Compensation~~	19
~~Proposal No. 4—Non-Binding Vote on Frequency of Non-Binding Votes on Executive Compensation~~	20
Report of the Audit Committee		2124
~~Report of the Compensation Committee~~	22
Executive Compensation		2226
Ownership of Securities		4548
Delinquent Section 16(a) ~~Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance~~Reports		4549
Transactions with Related Persons		4650
Stockholder Proposals for the ~~2019~~2023 Annual Meeting		4852
Householding of Proxy Materials		52
Other Business		4953
Annex A: Reconciliation of GAAP Measures to Non-GAAP Measures		A-1

	For the Years Ended December 31, (in thousands)
	2017		2016
Fees:
Audit fees	$	2,952	$	3,019
Audit Related fees⁽¹⁾		773		75
Tax fees⁽²⁾		298		344
All other fees⁽³⁾		298		—
Total	$	4,321	$	3,438

	Base Salary as of December 31, 2016		Base Salary as of December 31, 2017
Vicente Reynal, Chief Executive Officer	$	750,000	$	766,500
Philip T. Herndon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$	400,000	$	409,000
Andrew Schiesl, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary	$	450,000	$	460,000
Neil D. Snyder, Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Planning	$	345,000	$	353,000
Enrique Miñarro Viseras, Vice President and General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA⁽¹⁾	$	304,288	$	337,814

Achievement of Performance Target	Payout Percentage
Less than 95%	0%
95%	75%
100%	100%
110%	200%

								Adjusted EBITDA Payout Percentage
Name	2017 Base Salary		Target Bonus %			Target Bonus Amount		Industrials			Industrials EMEA			Weighted Average of Business Units⁽¹⁾			Weighted Payout Percentage			Actual Bonus Paid
Vicente Reynal⁽²⁾	$	766,500		100	%	$	766,500		150	%		N/A			142	%		144	%	$	1,103,760
Philip T. Herndon⁽²⁾	$	409,000		100	%	$	409,000		150	%		N/A			142	%		144	%	$	588,960
Andrew Schiesl	$	460,000		75	%	$	345,000		N/A			N/A			142	%		142	%	$	489,900
Neil Snyder	$	353,000		50	%	$	176,500		150	%					142	%		144	%	$	254,160
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽³⁾	$	337,814		45	%	$	152,016		150	%		120	%		N/A			135	%	$	205,222

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)⁽¹⁾		Bonus ($)⁽²⁾		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)⁽³⁾		All Other Compensation ($)⁽⁴⁾		Total ($)
Vicente Reynal, Chief Executive Officer		2017		765,754		225,000		—		1,103,760		285,581		2,380,095
Vicente Reynal, Chief Executive Officer		2016		750,000		—		4,568,331		877,500		233,614		6,429,445
Philip T. Herndon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2017		406,750		125,000		—		588,960		11,258		1,131,968
		2016		347,917		—		3,257,821		446,262		7,897		4,059,972
Andrew Schiesl, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary		2017		457,500		100,000		—		489,900		75,872		1,123,272
		2016		450,000		—		610,717		367,875		49,565		1,478,082
Neil Snyder, Senior Vice President, Strategy, Business Development and Planning		2017		351,000		75,000		—		254,160		123,941		804,101
Enrique Miñarro Viseras, Vice President and General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA⁽⁶⁾		2017		316,000		—		—		205,222		229,222		750,444
		2016		195,943		532,517		691,114		113,015		155,548		1,684,817

	Estimated Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾
Name	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
Vicente Reynal		8,083		766,500		1,533,000
Philip T. Herndon		4,313		409,000		818,000
Andrew Schiesl		10,914		345,000		690,000
Neil Snyder		3,722		176,500		353,000
Enrique Miñarro Viseras		57,006		152,016		304,032

Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽¹⁾	Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽²⁾	Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)⁽³⁾	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)	Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)⁽⁴⁾
Vicente Reynal	55,006	132,606	528,792	―	3,889,841
Vikram Kini	260,265	26,545	162,399	―	1,461,144
Andrew Schiesl	68,456	35,106	64,992	―	825,774
Enrique Miñarro Viseras	―	―	―	―	―
Michael Weatherred	―	11,916	23,200	―	144,971

	Option Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable⁽¹⁾		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable⁽²⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)⁽³⁾		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Vicente Reynal	5/10/2015		438,487		109,622				10.61	5/10/2025
	5/10/2015		219,244				109,622		10.61	5/10/2025
	5/10/2016		195,135		97,568				10.61	5/10/2026
	5/10/2016		195,134				97,567		10.61	5/10/2026
Philip T. Herndon	5/10/2016		156,108		78,054				10.61	5/10/2026
	5/10/2016		156,108				78,054		10.61	5/10/2026
	12/9/2016		28,261		42,392				11.43	12/9/2026
	12/9/2016		28,261				42,392		11.43	12/9/2026
Andrew Schiesl	3/7/2014		157,789		39,447				8.16	3/7/2024
	3/7/2014		157,789				39,447		8.16	3/7/2024
	3/7/2014		36,739		—				8.16	3/7/2024
Neil Snyder	5/10/2016		87,810		43,905				10.61	5/10/2026
	5/10/2016		87,810				43,905		10.61	5/10/2026
	12/1/2016		9,420		14,131				11.43	12/1/2026
	12/1/2016		9,421				14,131		11.43	12/1/2026
Enrique Miñarro Viseras	5/10/2016		27,215		40,823				10.61	5/10/2026
	5/10/2016		27,214				40,822		10.61	5/10/2026

Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽¹⁾		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽²⁾		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)⁽³⁾		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)⁽⁴⁾
Vicente Reynal		888,016		161,300		140,712		—		1,499,684
Philip T. Herndon		—		—		—		—		—
Andrew Schiesl		57,081		57,081		37,994		—		301,805
Neil Snyder		—		—		—		—		—
Enrique Miñarro Viseras		—		—		—		—		—

Name	Cash Severance Payment ($)⁽¹⁾		Continuation of Group Health Coverage ($)⁽²⁾		Accrued but Unused Vacation ($)⁽³⁾		Value of Time Option and Performance Option Acceleration ($)⁽⁴⁾		Total ($)
Vicente Reynal
Qualifying Termination		1,644,000		20,052		—		—		1,664,052
Change in Control		—		—		—		9,663,318		9,663,318
Philip T. Herndon
Qualifying Termination		409,000		20,052		—		—		429,052
Change in Control		—		—		—		5,548,079		5,548,079

Name	Fees Earned or Paid In Cash ($)		Option Awards ($)⁽¹⁾			Total ($)
Brandon F. Brahm		—		—			—
William P. Donnelly⁽²⁾		75,000		400,000			475,000
John Humphrey⁽³⁾		—		—			—
William E. Kassling		75,000			⁽¹⁾		75,000
Michael V. Marn		75,000			⁽¹⁾		75,000
Peter M. Stavros		—		—			—
Nickolas Vande Steeg		75,000			⁽¹⁾		75,000
Pastor Velasco⁽⁴⁾		75,000		422,519	⁽¹⁾		497,519
Joshua T. Weisenbeck		—		—			—

Name of beneficial owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percent of Common Stock Outstanding
Beneficial Owners of More than 5%
Investment funds affiliated with KKR⁽¹⁾		121,157,473		61.4	%
Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Vicente Reynal⁽²⁾		1,280,024			*
Philip T. Herndon⁽²⁾		538,305			*
Andrew Schiesl⁽²⁾		352,318			*
Neil D. Snyder⁽²⁾		222,721			*
Enrique Miñarro Viseras⁽²⁾		60,076			*
Peter M. Stavros⁽³⁾		—		—
Brandon F. Brahm⁽³⁾		—		—
William P. Donnelly⁽²⁾		65,041			*
John Humphrey		—			*
William E. Kassling⁽²⁾		376,003			*
Michael V. Marn⁽²⁾		46,026			*
Nickolas Vande Steeg⁽²⁾		222,920			*
Joshua T. Weisenbeck⁽³⁾		—		—
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)⁽²⁾		3,402,830		1.7	%

Principal Occupation and ~~Chief Financial Officer.~~Other Information

vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to joining Roper, Mr. Humphrey spent 12 years with Honeywell International, Inc. and its predecessor company, AlliedSignal, in a variety of financial leadership positions.

Mr. Humphrey’s earlier career included six years with Detroit Diesel Corporation, a manufacturer of heavy-duty engines, in a variety of engineering and manufacturing management positions. He is a member of the ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors of EnPro Industries, Inc. and O-I Glass, Inc. Mr. Humphrey received a ~~B.S.~~bachelor of science degree in ~~Industrial Engineering~~industrial engineering from Purdue University and an ~~M.B.A.~~master of business administration from the University of Michigan. Mr. Humphrey has many years of experience at manufacturing companies, including experience as the chief financial officer and board member of a publicly held company.